Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,365

    Time to Get a Backbone

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opin ... entary-hed

    Time to get a backbone on immigration
    Quit stalling and build a border wall

    Charles Krauthammer, a syndicated columnist based in Washington: Washington Post Writers Group

    April 10, 2006

    WASHINGTON -- Every sensible immigration policy has two objectives: (1) to regain control of our borders so that it is we who decide who enters, and (2) to find a way to normalize and legalize the situation of the 11 million illegals among us.

    Start with the second. No one of goodwill wants to see these 11 million suffer. But the obvious problem is that legalization creates an enormous incentive for new illegals to come.

    We say, of course, that this will be the very last, very final, never-again, we're-not-kidding-this-time amnesty. The problem is that we say exactly the same thing with every new reform. And everyone knows it's phony.

    What do you think was said when in 1986 we passed the Simpson-Mazzoli immigration reform? It turned into the largest legalization program in American history--nearly 3 million got permanent residency. And we are now back at it again with 11 million new illegals in our midst.

    How can it be otherwise? We already have a river of people coming every day knowing they're going to be illegal and perhaps even exploited. They come nonetheless. The newest amnesty--the "earned legalization" now being dangled in front of them by proposed Senate legislation--can only increase the flow.

    Those who think employer sanctions will control immigration are dreaming. Employer sanctions were the heart of Simpson-Mazzoli. They are not only useless, they are pernicious. They turn employers into enforcers of border control. That is the job of government, not landscapers.

    The irony of this whole debate, which is bitterly splitting the country along partisan, geographic and ethnic lines, is that there is a silver bullet that would not just solve the problem but also create a national consensus behind it.

    My proposition is the following: A vast number of Americans who oppose legalization and fear new waves of immigration would change their minds if we could radically reduce new--i.e., future--illegal immigration.

    Forget employer sanctions. Build a barrier. It is simply ridiculous to say it cannot be done. If one fence won't do it, then build a second 100 yards behind it. And then build a road for patrols in between. Put cameras. Put sensors. Put out lots of patrols.

    Can't be done? Israel's border fence has been extraordinarily successful in keeping out potential infiltrators who are far more determined than mere immigrants. Nor have very many North Koreans crossed into South Korea in the last 50 years.

    Of course it will be ugly. So are the concrete barriers to keep truck bombs from driving into the White House. But sometimes necessity trumps aesthetics. And don't tell me that this is our Berlin Wall. When you build a wall to keep people in, that's a prison. When you build a wall to keep people out, that's an expression of sovereignty. The fence around your house is a perfectly legitimate expression of your desire to control who comes into your house to eat, sleep and use the facilities. It imprisons no one.

    Of course, no barrier will be foolproof. But it doesn't have to be. It simply has to reduce the river of illegals to a manageable trickle. Once we can do that, everything becomes possible--most especially, humanizing the situation of our 11 million existing illegals.

    If the government can demonstrate that it can control future immigration, there will be infinitely less resistance to dealing generously with the residual population of past immigration. And, as journalist Mickey Kaus and others have suggested, that may require that the two provisions be sequenced. First, radical border control by physical means. Then shortly thereafter, radical legalization of those already here. To achieve national consensus on legalization, we will need a short lag time between the two provisions, perhaps a year or two, to demonstrate to the skeptics that the current wave of illegals is indeed the last.

    This is no time for mushy compromise. A solution requires two acts of national will: the ugly act of putting up a fence and the supremely generous act of absorbing as ultimately full citizens those who broke our laws to come to America.

    This is not a compromise meant to appease both sides without achieving anything. It is not some piece of hybrid legislation that arbitrarily divides illegals into those with five-year-old "roots" in America and those without, or some such mischief-making nonsense.

    This is full amnesty (earned with back taxes and learning English and the like) with full border control. If we do it right, not only will we solve the problem, we will get it done as one nation.

    ----------

    E-mail: letters@charleskrauthammer.com


    Copyright © 2006, Chicago Tribune
    http://www.alipac.us Enforce immigration laws!

  2. #2
    HomeOfTheBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Occupied Washington State
    Posts
    178
    the supremely generous act of absorbing as ultimately full citizens those who broke our laws to come to America.
    Good Lord! These illegals for the most part, don't want to assimilate, much less become citizens!! They just want to continue to pillage and plunder our country legally! And until the SSA and the IRS lets loose with some information, how will we know if they're legal or not? And who will care except us legal American citizens?

    And when they become "legal" and I use the term lightly, how long before they are demanding in the streets for more benefits and higher wages?

    Not feeling supremely generous lately.....
    Americans First!

  3. #3
    reform_now's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    361
    I thought Krauthammer was a smart man.
    The wall, we need. But American sentiment is past being "generous" with these law-breakers.
    How can he think that this "one last time" (sound familiar?) will stop further illegal immigration in the future? Has Ted Kennedy died?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •