Thread: transcript of Bushie's brown nose session

Sorry, no link, I received this in an email. Also, if this is a repeat, I will delete, but I did not see it.

Jump to Bush's outrageous remarks on 'vigilantes' and the Border
Patrol


Press Release

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 23, 2005

President Meets with President Fox and Prime Minister Martin

Bill Daniels Activity Center
Baylor University
Waco, Texas

March 23, 2005 -- 11:22 P.M. CST

PRESIDENT BUSH: Good morning. It's my honor to welcome two friends
to Baylor University. First, I want to thank the Baylor University
family for providing these facilities for us. Your hospitality is
awesome.

I appreciate the meetings we just had. Our relationships are
important today. We intend to keep our relationships strong. Our
relationships will be equally important for the years to come.

And so we had a good discussion about prosperity and security. And
it turns out the two go hand-in-hand. It's important for us to work
to make sure our countries are safe and secure, in order that our
people can live in peace, as well as our economies can grow. We've
got a lot of trade with each other and we intend to keep it that
way. We've got a lot of crossings of the border, I intend to make
our borders more secure and facilitate legal traffic.

We've got a lot to do. So we charged our ministers with the task of
figuring out how best to keep this relationship -- these
relationships vibrant and strong. And I appreciate the commitment of
the Prime Minister and the President toward a spirit of partnership
to outlast whatever politics may occur; that puts in place a firm
commitment to markets and democracy and freedom and trade and mutual
prosperity and mutual security.

And so I want to welcome our friends. After we go through this
exercise of democracy -- that being answering your questions -- I'm
looking forward to hosting them to the ranch for a little lunch and
a further discussion. We'll be spending time talking about the
neighborhood, the countries in our region, and how best we can work
together to make sure that democracy is firmly a part of the future
of this neighborhood of ours.

And so, Mr. President, welcome. The podium is yours, sir.

PRESIDENT FOX: (As translated.) Thank you very much, President Bush.
I want to also extend a greeting to Prime Minister Paul Martin, and
my gratitude for this wonderful reception, for this wonderful
facility here at Baylor University. And, of course, my gratitude to
the authorities here in Waco, the venue of this important event.

Today, we have met to hold a very important encounter that has to do
with the future of our nations. In the last decade, trade between
our countries, the flows of investment of the creation of jobs have
held a good pace. And these efforts have been successful thanks to
NAFTA, this bilateral cooperation, this trilateral cooperation has
now become strengthened and it has expanded. But, above all, we are
making progress on a daily basis toward greater understanding,
toward greater knowledge and greater cooperation between our three
governments and our three countries.

Through the Partnership for Security and Prosperity and the quality
of life of North America, today we begin a new phase. We are in a
world that is constantly changing and that demands that we meet the
new challenges and opportunities. We also face new threats that
carry a risk for our societies. But we also want to work toward the
good performance of our economies. This is why my government is
working toward a true coordination with our partners in North
America. We are seeking an objective balance between the concerns
that have to do with security and those that have to do with having
a good and agile flow of goods and people across the borders.

North America should be the most competitive region in the world. It
should be the safest region in the world. And ten years ago, we took
a great step in that direction. As a government, we are obligated to
turn this objective into a permanent process, to continue taking
steps forward. This Partnership for Security, this Partnership for
Prosperity, for the quality of life can have no other objective,
beyond improving the quality of life, itself, and the development of
our peoples and of our societies.

Today, my friend from Canada, Mr. Paul Martin, and the President of
the United States, George Bush, all of us feel proud to present this
joint statement to you. It reflects a shared vision for North
America that will be a framework for cooperation, for partnership
between our governments and nations.

Thank you.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: Good afternoon. It's a real pleasure to be
here in Texas and to stand with President Bush and President Fox as
representatives of a strong North America. We represent three
sovereign nations that have formed one of the most successful
partnerships in the world.

That being said, we also recognize that we cannot be complacent. The
world is not standing still; new economic powerhouses, such as China
and India, are rising and we face new opportunities -- but we also
face new challenges. And this requires a new partnership, stronger,
more dynamic, one that is focused on the future. We are determined
to forge the next generation of our continent's success. That's our
destination.

The security and prosperity partnership that we are launching today
is the road map to getting there.

I'm going to be a little longer than you were, President Bush,
because I've got to do this in two languages. (Laughter.)

(As translated.) Here, in North America, we have many achievements
to celebrate. But we do know that we cannot be complacent. The world
does not stand still. New opportunities present themselves, as well
as new challenges, as well as threats. In a world in constant
change, we need a renewed partnership, more strong, dynamic. And we
must have a road map that will bring us there. The road map is the
North American Partnership for Security and Prosperity, which we are
starting today.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: -- ways to help our citizens with healthier,
safer and more productive lives; for good jobs, for higher income;
as well as a secure continent, cleaner water, cleaner air.

One thing is very clear, and that is when we work together as
countries to make North America safer and more competitive, then the
fact is all of the continent and all of our citizen's benefit from
that collective achievement.

(As translated.) The partnership that we are starting today
acknowledges the fact that in a modern world the objective of
prosperity, security and a better quality of life have never been as
inter-dependent.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: What we seek to do is to improve the
competitiveness of our industries, expand consumer choice by cutting
red tape. We want to eliminate regulations that are a nuisance, not
a necessity. And we want to maintain the highest standards of health
care and safety for our citizens. We want to pursue agreed
approaches based on sound science that will help us avoid the risk
of hidden protectionism and, some would advocate, in responding to
BSE.

And I want to thank President Bush, I want to thank President Fox
for the support that they have shown. We look forward to the day in
the future when, notwithstanding all of the lobbying, all the legal
challenges, all of North America is open to our safe and high
quality beef.

In terms of security, we understand that protecting our borders is a
crucial checkpoint on the road to our collective prosperity. Our
safe borders secure our people not only against terrorism, but they
make possible a speedy flow of goods, services and people and
information among our three nations.

And standing on the shoulders of the Smart Borders Initiative, we
are making new investments in security and in defense spending.
Quite simply, Canada is a full and forceful partner in building a
secure North America. We have -- we have agreed -- and I've got a
long list here, Mr. President, which I'm going to forego, basically
a long list of items that we have agreed that we will task our
ministers to accomplish, and then we will hold them to account, as
we will be held to account by our people.

Let me just say that this great -- that these measures involve
everything from how do we deal with our borders, how do we deal with
infectious diseases, and how do we deal with fresh water concerns,
like Devil's Lake, which I will be talking to you about over lunch.

Let me just say that when a public health risk emerges, we want our
laboratory centers in Winnipeg, in Atlanta, and in Mexico City
talking to each other. We want to improve our air and our water
quality, and we also want to make NAFTA work. And what that means --
and, again, this is something we'll be talking about -- is that we
want the decisions of our dispute settlement panel to be respected
and implemented. We want to resolve our differences in a fair manner
based on the rule of law. And I'll continue to press for the
resolution of soft wood lumber dispute, and I look forward to
discussing means as to how we make this partnership work better.

Let me just say that we have committed as leaders to meet on a
regular basis. We're going to do this to assess our progress.

(As translated.) The efforts deployed over the last decade have been
fruitful. It is up to us now to meet the new challenges and to seize
the new opportunities that present themselves to us.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: Mr. President, the efforts of the past decade
have been successful, but as we said this morning, it now falls to
us to respond to new challenges, to seize new opportunities. The
security and prosperity partnership is our commitment to do so
together.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you, Paul. I appreciate that, very much.

We'll now answer two questions a side. I'll start with Jennifer
Loven.

Q Thank you, sir. Can you tell us what actions you support, since
the federal courts continue to decline to allow the reinsertion of
Terri Schiavo's feeding tube? And have you discussed options, next
steps with your brother, the Governor of Florida?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I have not discussed next steps with the brother --
my brother, who is the Governor of Florida. I have looked at all
options prior to taking the action we took last weekend, in concert
with Congress. And we felt like the actions taken with Congress was
the best course of action. This is an extraordinary and sad case,
and I believe that in a case such as this, the legislative branch,
the executive branch ought to err on the side of life, which we have.

And now we'll watch the courts make its decisions. But we looked at
all options from the executive branch perspective.

Q (As translated.) Mr. President Bush, many countries of Latin
America in recent years have elected leaders from the left. What
possibility do you see, as far as the arrival of a leader from the
left, in Mexico in the future? And on security, how difficult is it
for you to keep your national security policy in place when you have
a border where terrorists can go through that border, according to
your Cabinet? What do you think of those illegal crossings?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I am pleased that there are democracies in our
hemisphere. As a matter of fact, every country is a democracy except
one, Cuba. And that's incredible progress. And I look forward to
working with whomever the people of Mexico choose. The choices as to
who will lead Mexico, or any other country, is not the choice of the
United States President, the United States government, or the United
States people. It is the choice of the Mexican people.

And I know the people of Mexico are proud of their democracy. I'm
proud of the democratic traditions upheld by Vicente Fox.

In terms of the border, listen, we've got a large border. We've got
a large border with Canada, we've got a large border with Mexico.
There are some million people a day crossing the border from Mexico
to the United States, which presents a common issue, and that is,
how do we make sure those crossing the border are not terrorists, or
drug runners, or gun runners, or smugglers.

And I have told the President that we will -- I will continue to
push for reasonable, common-sense immigration policy with the United
States Congress. It is an issue with which I have got a lot of
familiarity -- after all, I was the governor of this great state for
six years and I dealt with this issue a lot, not only with President
Fox's predecessors, but with governors of border states -- Mexican
border states, Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon. And I know what -- I know
the issue well. And I will continue to call upon Congress to be
commonsensical about this issue.

And the basis of the policy is that if there is a job opening which
an American won't do, in other words -- and there's a willing worker
and a willing employer, that job ought to be filled on a legal
basis, no matter where the person comes from. That makes sense. We
need a compassionate policy. In other words, if this is in place,
someone will be able to come and work from Mexico in the United
States, and be able to go home -- back and forth across the border
in a legal fashion. That seems to make sense to me. It's a
commonsensical way of doing things.

I think we ought to have a policy that does not jeopardize those
who've stood in line trying to become legal citizens. We want to
reward those who have been patient in the process. There's plenty of
Mexican citizens who have applied for citizenship, they should --
their position in line should not be preempted because of there's a
worker program. But there's a better way to enforce our border. And
one way is to be compassionate and decent about the workers who are
coming here to the United States.

And, Mr. President, you've got my pledge, I'll continue working on
it. You don't have my pledge that Congress will act, because I'm not
a member of the legislative branch. But you will have my pledge that
I will continue to push our Congress to come up with rational,
common-sense immigration policy.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: Tom Clark.

Q Thank you, Prime Minister. A question to yourself, and to
President Bush and President Fox, as well. You've been talking about
cooperation, what you, Prime Minister, referred to as the new
generation of success, or the next generation of success. Keeping in
mind, in front of us, the European Union, how much is this
partnership a first step towards continental integration? If so, how
far would you like to go? And can you give us some sort of a road
map, and perhaps give us a distinction between partnership and
integration?

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: Well, what we're really talking about here is
not a big thing, we're talking about big progress. And if you look
at each of the areas in which we have tasked our ministers, based on
the work that they have already done, that is precisely what is
coming out of this meeting and that's precisely why we want to be
able to measure -- to measure the success and hold people
accountable for the targets that we have set.

So when you're talking about security, there's no doubt about the
importance of the security of our borders; given the increase in
Canada's defense budget, our ability to work together, that
obviously, we want to make sure that there is the greatest degree of
coordination between our defense and our border sources.

In terms of the economy, getting rid of nuisance regulation, making
sure that we have better rules of origin. Essentially, what we want
to do is to make sure, given the threat that we face from rising
economies elsewhere, but primarily in Asia -- both the threats and
an opportunity, by the way -- that, in fact, North America is as
strong and as competitive as it can possibly be. And there should be
no restriction on that -- quality of life, the environment, how we
work together -- so that essentially what we really want to do is to
make very, very substantial progress and to make sure that we
continue to do it, so that the forces of protectionism never take
over North America and that we're as competitive as we can.

(As translated.) I just wanted to say that what we're trying to do
is not a big bang, what we're truly seeking to do is major progress.
And this is in the field of border security, for example, what we
have done so far. We went even further and now the government of
Canada is spending money on its borders and its defense. And we're
going much further in terms of elimination of nuisance regulations
so that Canada can be competitive in the United States as it is in
Canada and Mexico, but also maintaining quality of life environment,
working together. That's what we're seeking to do.

PRESIDENT FOX: (As translated.) Thank you. I feel that the purpose
that we have discussed today is clear. This is an objective that has
been coming on for several months now as a result of an intense
dialogue. We are talking about a partnership -- that is the key
word, partnership -- a partnership for security and a partnership
for prosperity, a partnership that is based on human capital and
that aims to improve the quality of life. This is the key element of
this new task that we have laid out for ourselves. We have built
upon NAFTA's achievements. It is widely -- the benefits of NAFTA are
widely known, but now we find new challenges that demand that we
take new actions. These actions are defined in the program that is
being launched through these precise instructions that we have given
our ministers, our working groups, and their instructions are to
carry out these ideas in the next 90 days.

So we are going to work through several approaches, and our purposes
are based on three pillars of this proposal. The three pillars are
security, to address any threat that might arise from abroad,
address internal threats. We need to address also the inefficiencies
in the movement of people, merchandise and goods. We must also look
to join talent, strategy and resources to improve North America's
competitiveness with other countries in other regions of the world.
We need a level of competitiveness that allows us to reach the
objectives that we have laid out for ourselves.

We need to reduce the costs of doing trade. We have a lot of trade
between our three countries, and we feel that we can still bring
down the costs of trade much more, and that will allow the trade
between our countries to increase even more. We think that the
biggest challenge of the 21st will have to do with human capital,
investing in our people, investing in technology, and that is
another thing that we are going to work on.

Moreover, we are partners in protecting the environment. We are
partners to protect our natural resources. We are partners to
protect the health of our people. And we are partners, too, in the
broadest sense of the word. So that is the road that we have before
us. We have a time line and we have responsibilities to carry out
and we will make sure that these things happen.

PRESIDENT BUSH: The future of our three countries will best be
served by establishing trade relations with the rest of the
hemisphere. It's kind of the most logical extension of a vision that
recognizes that common trading areas are going to be needed in order
to maintain lifestyle, particularly as the Far East begins to emerge
as strong competitors for capital and goods and services and markets.

We started to advance this idea in Quebec City, as a matter of fact,
the 2001 Free Trade Agreement of the Americas. To me, that's the
most practical extension of the recognition of the realities that
we're all going to be facing as the 21st century evolves. In order
to make sure that the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas has a
chance to succeed, it is important to show the sovereign nations in
South America that trade has worked amongst the three of us. NAFTA
has been a success. All you've got to do is go down to the border of
our state. If you could have gone down ten years ago and gone down
today, you would have seen a marked difference of quality of life on
both sides of the border. I mean, it's been a very successful
program in order to lift the standard of living in Mexico and the
United States.

And I think when people see that we're willing to continue to work
through issues -- Canada, the United States and Mexico -- it may
make it more palatable for countries to recognize the benefits of
trade. So that the vision that you asked about in your question as
to what kind of union might there be, I see one based upon free
trade, that would then entail commitment to markets and democracy,
transparency, rule of law.

To this extent, we have entered into an agreement with the Central
American nations, called CAFTA. I think -- I know it's an important
part of the prosperity agenda throughout the hemisphere, and I asked
Congress to make sure that they approve CAFTA this year.

Thank you. Caren.

Q Secretary Rice has made clear that the United States is growing
impatient with North Korea's refusal to come back to the six-way
talks. And there has been talk that the United States has a June
deadline. What consequences would there be if they don't come back
to the talks? And, also, is China doing enough to keep the pressure
on?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Thank you for bringing up Secretary Rice. She just
got back from her trip Monday evening, and came down to Crawford
yesterday to brief me on the trip. I'm grateful that she took time
out of her schedule to come down and talk about, not only the
discussions she had with China, but discussions she had with South
Korea and Japan, the leaders of India and Pakistan, and she also
went to Afghanistan, so she had an extensive trip and about a two-
hour briefing I want you to know.

We didn't set deadlines. What we said is what we've said to North
Korea, if you want to -- if you want the way forward, if you want to
be accepted by the world, if you want not to be isolated, get rid of
your weapons programs. And, fortunately, it's not just the United
States of America saying that. China says that. As a matter of fact,
it was here at Crawford that Jiang Zemin at the ranch said that the
foreign policy goal of the Chinese is for there to be no nuclear
weapons on the Korean Peninsula. And Hu Jintao made that clear to
Secretary Rice that that is still the objective of the Chinese
government, so we share an objective. We share a goal. The Japanese
share that goal. The South Koreans share that goal. The Russians
share that goal.

So we've got five nations saying the same thing to Korea -- North
Korea. And we'll continue saying it to North Korea. And I'm a
patient person, and so are a lot of people that are involved in this
issue. But the leader of North Korea must understand that when we
five nations speak, we mean what we say. And there is a way forward -
- and I repeat for Kim Jong-il. And it's his choice to make. We've
made our choice. China has made its choice. The other countries have
made their choices. And for the sake of peace and tranquility and
stability in the Far East, Kim Jong-il must listen.

And so I am pleased with the report I got from the Secretary. I am
pleased today that Hu Jintao and the Chinese government expressed
continued interest in this subject and understanding of the
importance of the five of us working together to achieve the common
objective that we have set out.

Q (As translated.) Mr. Presidents and Mr. Prime Minister, I wanted
to ask you what concrete actions do your governments want to lay out
in order to make this partnership a reality as far as energy
markets, which is a very critical issue for all of our countries --
energy markets? I also want to ask you in this security and
prosperity partnership, when will you include the migratory, or
immigration policy in this partnership?

And, President Bush, I wanted to ask you about your opinion about
those people who are hunting migrant people along the border.

PRESIDENT BUSH (responds to Mexican reporter's question about what
appeared to be concerning the Minuteman Project): I'm against
vigilantes in the United States of America. I'm for enforcing law in
a rational way. That's why you got a Border Patrol, and they ought
to be in charge of enforcing the border. [American Patrol webmaster
note: This is the same snake oil salesman who failed to include
funding in his budget for a 2,000 man per year increase in agents
called for by congress. His budget included funding for a mere 210
agent increase.]

We talked about migration, of course -- we spent a lot of time
talking about migration. We've got a big border with Canada, a big
border with Mexico, and it's an important issue. But the issue on
the borders is not just people, it's goods and services. And so the
agreements we're talking about, the way to strengthen our
relationships of course includes our border policy. And we'll
continue to include border policy.

I forgot the other part of your three-part question. What's that --
you have something else you asked? I can't remember what it was. Oh,
energy, yes.

Look, yes, we're using a lot of it and we need to conserve better in
the United States. We're dependant on energy from overseas and we've
got to become less dependent on energy from overseas. We appreciate
the fact that Canada's tar sands are now becoming economical, and
we're glad to be able to get the access toward a million barrels a
day, headed toward two million barrels a day. And I want to thank --
and that's, by the way, an advantage for open trade; the American
people must understand that when there is open trade, it helps solve
our energy deficiency.

But one thing we can certainly do is cooperate better on sharing
technologies. Look, we're going to have to change our habits. We're
going to have to develop a hydrogen-powered automobile. And we look
forward to working together. We've got integrated automobile
industries between the three of us. And someday, hopefully, our
automobile industries in our respective countries will be on the
leading edge of technological change when it comes to helping change
the habits of our consumers.

We're going to need liquefied natural gas coming into our three
countries and into our markets. And I look forward with the
Presidents on how to develop more access to liquefied natural gas,
which -- and there's a lot of natural gas in the world. The question
is, how do we economically get it to our respective markets.

I recently went and saw those developing zero emission coal-fired
plants. I think we spent about a billion dollars on what's called
the FutureGen Project. Look forward to working with our respective
countries on sharing technologies and how to move forward to come up
with zero emissions coal-fired plants.

And so there's a lot we can do and will do on energy. But there's no
question the United States of America is hooked on foreign sources
of energy. And I put forth a strategy to the United States Congress
in 2001; they're still debating it, the issue. Now is the time to
get a bill to my desk; this is the year. People see the prices of
their gasoline rising at the pumps, and I am concerned and the
American people are concerned, and it's now time to implement the
strategies that we laid out in law.

But, no, this is a very important subject matter. Thank you for
bringing it up. We spent a lot of time discussing it.

PRESIDENT FOX: (As translated.) As far as concrete actions, the
first concrete actions are those that have to do with all of the
topics addressed by this Partnership for Security and Prosperity and
quality of life. And the first concrete actions are going to be a
specific charge of 90 days to present detailed ideas at 12 different
working groups, working tables that have to do with the general
ideas that we are laying out here.

Another concrete action that we have agreed to is that the three
Presidents feel that about halfway through this 90-day period of
time, we need to be able to assess the direction, the pace and the
degree to which these issues are becoming a reality towards the end
of those 90 days. We want to be sure to have that final report be
complete with all of the detail necessary, with all of the vision
necessary that the Presidents have laid out.

Concrete actions in this sense also have to do with a sector-by-
sector analysis so that from these analyses, we can create a
strategy, sector-by-sector, perhaps third-generation strategies that
go beyond anything we've done before to make the economies work
well, jointly. Also concrete actions as far as security along the
borders. And especially in our territories. Specifically in Mexico
we want to ensure peace and tranquility for our society, we want to
provide guarantee to our people that our security plans are working
in every sense. Mexico has a very ambitious security package that
starts with our southern border, with our brothers, friends,
neighbors and partners in Central America, where we also want to
address the issue of security because, in the end, this has
repercussions throughout North America.

Concrete action will be taken as far as quality of life issues --
health, education. I repeat, we are going to write these down, write
these objectives down in black and white and carry out, then, have
this plan well configured and consolidated within the next 90 days,
to make sure that it is feasible, because all of us have a sense of
urgency. We want to make North America into the most competitive
region in the world, and we can do it with actions in the fields of
energy, education, technology, security and through protecting our
natural resources. This should serve to give us a level of
competitiveness that we seek.

In effect, we discussed immigration. We discussed it as a trilateral
issue. We discussed the issue of border crossings and how we can
protect our borders and be efficient along the border, and also how
we can keep people from crossing who shouldn't be crossing, and
address the threats that our nations have faced. So this is
something that we also look at jointly. And in the end, this also
has to do with competitiveness. And it also has to do with reaching
the objectives that we have for security and quality of life.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: In terms of energy as -- we all know of the
tremendous capacity that exists within Mexico. President Bush has
referred to the tar sands, which are a great, great opportunity. And
in fact, the whole energy sector, I think, for all of us is a huge,
huge opportunity in terms of our competitiveness with the rest of
the world. But in addition to the tar sands, you've got our
conventional sources. You've got the Beaufort, the Hull, the
question of pipelines that eventually will be addressed.

But there are also other areas, renewables. The President talked
about clean coal technology, as an example. Renewables are dependent
upon technology. And we're putting a lot now into wind pump -- into
wind power. There is in the province of Saskatchewan, a major
project going on, in terms of CO2 sequestration, which essentially
will be a major factor in fighting -- in the whole climate change
issue, and tremendous opportunities for us using these new
technologies.

But the other thing that I would like to highlight, as well, in
addition to nuclear, is Canada has great potential in terms of hydro-
electricity. Northern Manitoba, Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador,
to simply only give you a couple of examples. And what we've got to
do -- especially looking at the failure of the electricity grid in
North America a year ago, we've got to make sure that that grid is
very, very sound. So the opportunities for cooperation are huge.

PRESIDENT BUSH: The final question, Paul.

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: Anne Dawson.

Q My question is both to President Bush and Prime Minister Martin.
You've had some very sharp differences with Canada in the past,
especially on issues like missile defense. Has this strained
relations? And is the door still open for Canada to join missile
defense in the future, something you call fundamental to the defense
of North America?

PRIME MINISTER MARTIN: Our relationships are very, very strong, and
in a wide range of areas, and the fact that the three of us are
meeting here today, and that we have put out what is really quite an
ambitious program that is going to be measurable, I think is an
indication of that.

Are there differences of opinion? Of course, there have -- there
have been throughout our history and there will be in the future. On
BMD, the file is closed. But our cooperation, in terms of defense,
in terms of our borders, in terms of the defense of our common
frontiers, is very -- is not only very clear, but it is being
accentuated. And I've got to take that one step further. The defense
of North America is not only going to take place in North America.
Canada is playing an increasing load [sic] as an example -- role --
in Afghanistan. And that's also part of the defense of North America.

So we're working together and we're going to continue to work
together increasingly in the whole way in which we establish a
common security, in which we protect it, and our defense.

(As translated.) With respect to the shield, this is an issue that
is closed. But in terms of capacity to work together, this is
something where we have provided major budgetary increases, because
we want to protect ourselves at home in Canada. We want to assume
our responsibilities in North America at the border level, in the
north, and with the oceans. But we must also say that Canada will
accentuate its role in Afghanistan. That shows you to what extent
the defense of North America is not only here in North America, but
really that speaks of the necessity to bring the battle beyond our
borders.

THE PRESIDENT: It's interesting -- "sharp differences." I guess
that's -- "sharp" means kind of, if you think about what that means,
that means maybe differences so that we can't have a positive
relationship. I view them -- look, we've got differences. I don't
know if you'd categorize them as differences that would then prevent
us from finding common ground. I don't view it that way. I
understand why people disagree with certain decisions I have made,
but that doesn't prevent us from cooperating in intelligence-
sharing, for example.

You know, a lot is made about softwood lumber, and it's clearly a
sensitive issue. I know it firsthand. I've heard it ever since I
became elected President. People are frustrated that we haven't got
it solved. I understand that. But think about all the trade we've
got between our countries, and we've resolved a lot of issues in a
positive manner and we'll continue to resolve them. I mean, we had
an issue with cows, and that is getting resolved. I'm amazed that we
don't have more sharp -- whatever you call them -- disagreements --
because we're doing a lot together.

In other words, what I'm telling you is that I think the
relationship is very strong and very positive. And just because
somebody doesn't agree with our policy doesn't mean that we can't
continue to have very positive relationships. The relationship with
Mexico and the relationship with Canada are very important for the
United States of America. And there's going to be disagreements and
differences, and the fundamental question is, do we have the
capacity to continue moving forward with the relationship, and the
answer is, absolutely.

And I want to thank the leaders for coming. People of our respective
countries will see how vital these relationships are. And I look
forward to our ministers reporting back with concrete action -- they
will be held to account, you're right, Mr. Prime Minister -- and
look forward to saying to our respective peoples that -- and making
clear that the relationship between America, Canada and Mexico is
vital to our mutual prosperity, mutual health, and the benefit of
our folks.

Thank you all for coming. Good to see you all.

END 12:05 P.M. CST

There are some million people a day crossing the border from Mexico
to the United States, which presents a common issue, and that is,
how do we make sure those crossing the border are not terrorists, or
drug runners, or gun runners, or smugglers.

The answer is simple Mr. President. You secure the borders. You enforce immigration laws. You don't pander for votes. You uphold the oath of your office.

Illegal used to mean against the law. Now it is a voting block.

An Interview With Congressman Tom Tancredo (R - CO)
John Hawkins: Do you think offering amnesty to illegal aliens currently in the United States would cause an explosion in the number of illegals coming to our country?

Tom Tancredo: Only if you believe that rewarding illegal behavior will increase illegal behavior, and of course it will. It has happened before, it's completely predictable. If you tell people they will be benefit from coming into the United States illegally, not by waiting in line like everybody else, they will come. And why would they not?

http://www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/tancredo.php

Tancredo said a great deal more in this interview and it is worth reading. One thing is certain.. he will do a lot better than Mr. Bush.