These plaintiffs are exploiting our court system as a race-baiting stage for their agenda to destroy America. The time periods of the original bans they are disputing have either already expired (90 day) or will by the end of May (120 day) prior to the 9th circuit hearing, so it's all either moot or water under the bridge anyway. I guess the revised ban would have new time periods that extend into the summer from March 16th forward to June (90 day) and July (120 day), but is there any practical effect to that now? Trump's already close to his 50,000 total refugee limit and will probably have met that number before then anyway, and that's refugees from everywhere.

I'm just a nervous nellie when it comes to court cases on immigration and the reason is we never win them, they always go to the other side in their final resolution. whether conservative or liberal, because for some untold reason these judges are more sympathetic to the plights of immigrants than to the protections of citizens.