Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member butterbean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,181

    U.S. Blocked Release of CAFTA Reports

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nation ... -headlines

    AP: U.S. Blocked Release of CAFTA Reports

    By LARRY MARGASAK
    Associated Press Writer
    Posted June 29 2005, 4:39 AM EDT

    WASHINGTON -- The Labor Department kept secret for more than a year government studies that supported Democratic opponents of the Bush administration's new Central American trade deal, internal documents show.

    The studies, paid for by the department, concluded that several countries the administration wants to be granted free-trade status have poor working conditions and fail to protect workers' rights. The agency dismissed the conclusions as inaccurate and biased, according to documents reviewed by The Associated Press.

    "In practice, labor laws on the books in Central America are not sufficient to deter employers from violations, as actual sanctions for violations of the law are weak or nonexistent," the contractor, the International Labor Rights Fund, wrote in one of the reports.

    The studies' conclusions contrast with the administration's arguments that Central American countries have made enough progress on such issues to warrant a free-trade deal with the United States.

    The administration and its congressional supporters argue that the elimination of trade barriers for U.S. products would open new Central American markets for U.S. farmers and manufacturers. Critics argue the trade agreement would allow serious labor violations to continue in Central America.

    Hoping to lure enough Democratic votes to win passages, U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman earlier this month promised to spend money and arrange an international conference to ensure "the best agreement ever negotiated by the United States on labor rights."

    But behind the scenes, the administration began as early as spring 2004 to block the reports' public release.

    The Labor Department instructed its contractor to remove the reports from its Web site, ordered it to retrieve paper copies before they became public, banned release of new information from the reports, and even told the contractor it couldn't discuss the studies with outsiders.

    The Labor Department has now worked out a deal with the contractor that will allow the labor rights group to release the country-by-country final reports -- provided there's no mention of the agency or federal funding. At the same time, the administration began a pre-emptive campaign to undercut the study's conclusions.

    Used as talking points by trade-pact supporters, a Labor Department document accuses the contractor of writing a report filled with "unsubstantiated" statements and "biased attacks, not the facts."

    The contractor's deputy director, Bama Athreya, blamed U.S. Trade Representative officials for circulating the document and citing passages that won't be included in the final versions of the reports.

    One lawmaker said he was shocked that a federal agency charged with protecting the rights of Americans workers would go to such lengths to block the public from seeing its own contractor's concerns before Congress votes on the Central American Free Trade Agreement.

    "You would think if any agency in our government would care about this, it would be the Labor Department," Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-S.D., said.

    Dorgan said he would use the contractor findings in an attempt to defeat the agreement, known as CAFTA.

    Dirk Fillpot, spokesman for the Labor Department's Bureau of International Labor Affairs, said the agency and an independent evaluator concluded the contractor "failed to meet the academic rigor expected to fulfill its contract" and the relationship was terminated June 10.

    The competitively bid contract totaled $937,000, but Fillpot said $250,000 will be refunded to the Treasury.

    Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, who supports the trade agreement, said he is familiar with drafts of the reports and believes they will be "widely dismissed as a fraud." He accused the contractor of producing "a propaganda piece" and concealing "its rabid anti-CAFTA bias."

    Athreya, the contractor official, has testified in Congress against the agreement.

    The documents show the studies came within a whisker of widespread release in March 2004, when the labor-rights group posted them briefly on its Internet site.

    The Labor Department quickly and successfully demanded the reports be removed on grounds they weren't approved by the agency. Officials also demanded the group retrieve a limited number of paper copies that were distributed at a hearing of a Latin American human rights body.

    . Blocked Release of CAFTA Reports

    Shortly after that incident, Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., began a yearlong effort to pry the studies from the department through a Freedom of Information Act request. The department rejected his request until two months ago, when Levin received -- and released -- early drafts of the reports.

    The Trade Representative's spokesman, Richard Mills, said trade officials referred to the Labor Department's critical document after receiving inquiries about the studies.

    "From our perspective, nothing has changed. It's a great agreement that will improve labor conditions in Central America," Mills said.

    * ___

    On the net:

    Read related documents at http://wid.ap.org/documents/cafta/index.html

    International Labor Rights Fund: http://www.laborrights.org/

    U.S. Department of Labor: http://www.dol.gov/
    RIP Butterbean! We miss you and hope you are well in heaven.-- Your ALIPAC friends

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    HEY, RICHARD MILLS.....hello? This is an American calling to tell you, you work for me, Idiot, not Central America. We don't care about labor conditions in Central America other than "we hope their government will take steps to improve things".

    Central America is not our problem.

    Mexico is not our problem.

    If they want to set up a system likes ours, we'll help them do it.

    But, we aren't shipping one more manufacturing company, one more investment dollar, one more job out of this country through LEGISLATION OR REGULATION.

    What private businesses may decide to do on their own recognizance is for the most part up to them, but we aren't paying YOU, Richard Mills, to lift one damn finger to escort them out of the United States to set up shop in another country.

    You just got on the Pink-Slip List!! Oh yeeeeah, we're keepin' a list and checkin' it twice, gonna find out who's been naughty or nice.

    AND THEN lying, hiding facts, denying...scheming, plotting, manipulating data and information....to push CAFTA through the Congress, a bill that will flood our nation with immigrants we can't sustain; suck our manufacturing economy out of the country; all to end our nation through a weakened economy and open borders means one thing:

    YOU ARE A DISGUSTING IRRESPREHENSIBLE TRAITOR!!
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,032
    We have a LOT of work to do...sometimes it's amazing how fast they're working...how many there are....their incomprehensible stupidity that they want to destroy THEIR OWN NATION....don't they realize WHO THEY ARE IN BED WITH??

    RR
    The men who try to do something and fail are infinitely better than those who try to do nothing and succeed. " - Lloyd Jones

  4. #4
    Senior Member CountFloyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Occupied Territories, Alta Mexico
    Posts
    3,008
    But behind the scenes, the administration began as early as spring 2004 to block the reports' public release.
    This is becoming a predictable pattern with this administration.
    It's like hell vomited and the Bush administration appeared.

  5. #5
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168
    Yep, keep us ignorant. Hey morons we aren’t stupid, we can see right through your tricks.
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •