Thread: U.S. tries everything, but can't slow Chávez

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/12576876.htm

Posted on Wed, Sep. 07, 2005

VENEZUELA


Posted on Wed, Sep. 07, 2005

VENEZUELA


U.S. tries everything, but can't slow Chávez

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is thriving in his opposition to President Bush. The administration has struggled to respond.

BY PABLO BACHELET

pbachelet@herald.com


WASHINGTON - Several months ago, the Bush administration decided to implement a two-pronged policy to contain Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez: expose him before his regional peers as a dangerous meddler and support Venezuelan institutions such as labor unions and political parties as a way to offset his growing power.

But the policy has gotten off to a rocky start, interviews with former and current administration officials and analysts show.

Chávez, who openly touts his friendship with Cuban leader Fidel Castro, has proved adept at countering every challenge thrown his way by Washington, observers say. Latin American nations have been reluctant to turn against a neighbor flush with oil money, and administration officials say they're unwilling to reveal the most damning evidence against Chávez for fear of compromising intelligence sources.

On the public-relations front, the administration has struggled to produce an alternative to Chávez's populist appeal.

''The alternative should not be how you stop Chávez but how you have an alternative message for the region that is more compelling,'' said Bernard Aronson, who was assistant secretary of state for Latin America in the early 1990s.

LOST LEVERAGE

The Bush administration lost much of its leverage on Venezuela after it appeared to condone a failed coup against Chávez in April of 2002, undermining Washington's reputation as a defender of democracy. Afterward, Washington supported an ''electoral'' and ''constitutional'' solution to Venezuela's political crisis. With mediation by the Organization of American States and the Carter Center, Venezuela held a recall referendum on Chávez in August 2004 that he easily won.

After the referendum, the administration went back to the drawing board to come up with a new policy. Officials say some in the government advocated a get-tough approach by, for instance, turning a spotlight on allegations that Chávez did not play fair in the referendum or turning up negative evidence about Chávez's record on human rights and corruption . There was at least one proposal that would have affected Venezuela's oil industry.

''Scrimmages within the administration on Venezuela were often very, very rough,'' said Miguel Diaz, a former CIA analyst on Latin America who tracked the internal debate on Venezuela last year for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In January, the State Department decided to form its own task force to better monitor events in Venezuela.

The policy review was completed in the spring. The idea was to help the Venezuelan opposition and other ''civil society'' groups with money and other resources supplied by the National Endowment for Democracy -- a private institution that obtains most of its money from the U.S. Congress -- and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Chávez has accused the National Endowment for Democracy of supporting groups that have tried to overthrow him.

The administration also wants Latin Americans and Europeans to do the same, creating what the official described as ``connections between their NGOs [non-governmental organizations] and Venezuela.''

In early June, Bush met at the White House with MarÃÂ*a Corina Machado, a spokeswoman for Súmate, a grass-roots citizen participation movement. Machado is facing treason charges for accepting U.S. funds to promote the recall referendum.

At the same time, officials have tried to put the spotlight on Chávez's purported meddling in places such as Bolivia and Ecuador.

ROLES IN BOLIVIA

Roger Pardo-Maurer, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's top advisor on Latin America, in July told the Heritage Institute, a conservative think tank, that Cuba and Venezuela had a deliberate plan to make Bolivia a ``Marxist, radical, anti-U.S., pro-Cuba, drug-production state.''

Rumsfeld said last month that Cuba and Venezuela have been involved in Bolivia ``in unhelpful ways.''

Bush administration officials have said Venezuela provided cash and other assistance to radical groups. But the administration has declined to go into details, citing concerns that doing so would reveal intelligence-gathering sources.

The result is that U.S. statements have sounded mostly empty, analysts said.

Chávez has dismissed most U.S. allegations against his government as lies or intrusions into the sovereign affairs of a state. He has also gone on the offensive.

He dismisses Bush's push for free trade in the hemisphere as a self-serving ''neo-liberal'' ploy to further impoverish Latin Americans. He has increased his influence in the region by spending hundreds of millions of dollars on bonds from Ecuador and Argentina, and has offered cheap oil to Caribbean nations.

ROBERTSON AFFAIR

The administration was embarrassed when the Rev. Pat Robertson, a religious broadcaster and former Republican presidential candidate, suggested last month that Chávez be assassinated.

Robertson eventually apologized, but to many Latin Americans the affair appeared to give credibility to Chávez's assertions that Bush was plotting to kill him.

When the United States tried to get the Organization of American States to make sure countries are governing more democratically, Venezuela successfully spearheaded a campaign to water down the initiative.

''Every time there is a public-relations crisis [the Bush administration] seems to be on the losing end,'' says Diaz.


U.S. tries everything, but can't slow Chávez

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is thriving in his opposition to President Bush. The administration has struggled to respond.

BY PABLO BACHELET

pbachelet@herald.com


WASHINGTON - Several months ago, the Bush administration decided to implement a two-pronged policy to contain Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez: expose him before his regional peers as a dangerous meddler and support Venezuelan institutions such as labor unions and political parties as a way to offset his growing power.

But the policy has gotten off to a rocky start, interviews with former and current administration officials and analysts show.

Chávez, who openly touts his friendship with Cuban leader Fidel Castro, has proved adept at countering every challenge thrown his way by Washington, observers say. Latin American nations have been reluctant to turn against a neighbor flush with oil money, and administration officials say they're unwilling to reveal the most damning evidence against Chávez for fear of compromising intelligence sources.

On the public-relations front, the administration has struggled to produce an alternative to Chávez's populist appeal.

''The alternative should not be how you stop Chávez but how you have an alternative message for the region that is more compelling,'' said Bernard Aronson, who was assistant secretary of state for Latin America in the early 1990s.

LOST LEVERAGE

The Bush administration lost much of its leverage on Venezuela after it appeared to condone a failed coup against Chávez in April of 2002, undermining Washington's reputation as a defender of democracy. Afterward, Washington supported an ''electoral'' and ''constitutional'' solution to Venezuela's political crisis. With mediation by the Organization of American States and the Carter Center, Venezuela held a recall referendum on Chávez in August 2004 that he easily won.

After the referendum, the administration went back to the drawing board to come up with a new policy. Officials say some in the government advocated a get-tough approach by, for instance, turning a spotlight on allegations that Chávez did not play fair in the referendum or turning up negative evidence about Chávez's record on human rights and corruption . There was at least one proposal that would have affected Venezuela's oil industry.

''Scrimmages within the administration on Venezuela were often very, very rough,'' said Miguel Diaz, a former CIA analyst on Latin America who tracked the internal debate on Venezuela last year for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In January, the State Department decided to form its own task force to better monitor events in Venezuela.

The policy review was completed in the spring. The idea was to help the Venezuelan opposition and other ''civil society'' groups with money and other resources supplied by the National Endowment for Democracy -- a private institution that obtains most of its money from the U.S. Congress -- and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Chávez has accused the National Endowment for Democracy of supporting groups that have tried to overthrow him.

The administration also wants Latin Americans and Europeans to do the same, creating what the official described as ``connections between their NGOs [non-governmental organizations] and Venezuela.''

In early June, Bush met at the White House with MarÃÂ*a Corina Machado, a spokeswoman for Súmate, a grass-roots citizen participation movement. Machado is facing treason charges for accepting U.S. funds to promote the recall referendum.

At the same time, officials have tried to put the spotlight on Chávez's purported meddling in places such as Bolivia and Ecuador.

ROLES IN BOLIVIA

Roger Pardo-Maurer, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's top advisor on Latin America, in July told the Heritage Institute, a conservative think tank, that Cuba and Venezuela had a deliberate plan to make Bolivia a ``Marxist, radical, anti-U.S., pro-Cuba, drug-production state.''

Rumsfeld said last month that Cuba and Venezuela have been involved in Bolivia ``in unhelpful ways.''

Bush administration officials have said Venezuela provided cash and other assistance to radical groups. But the administration has declined to go into details, citing concerns that doing so would reveal intelligence-gathering sources.

The result is that U.S. statements have sounded mostly empty, analysts said.

Chávez has dismissed most U.S. allegations against his government as lies or intrusions into the sovereign affairs of a state. He has also gone on the offensive.

He dismisses Bush's push for free trade in the hemisphere as a self-serving ''neo-liberal'' ploy to further impoverish Latin Americans. He has increased his influence in the region by spending hundreds of millions of dollars on bonds from Ecuador and Argentina, and has offered cheap oil to Caribbean nations.

ROBERTSON AFFAIR

The administration was embarrassed when the Rev. Pat Robertson, a religious broadcaster and former Republican presidential candidate, suggested last month that Chávez be assassinated.

Robertson eventually apologized, but to many Latin Americans the affair appeared to give credibility to Chávez's assertions that Bush was plotting to kill him.

When the United States tried to get the Organization of American States to make sure countries are governing more democratically, Venezuela successfully spearheaded a campaign to water down the initiative.

''Every time there is a public-relations crisis [the Bush administration] seems to be on the losing end,'' says Diaz.

What is Chávez's crime that the US doesnt want him in power? Could it be that he is rejecting CAFTA and the FTAA? That makes him anti-globalists. What is wrong with that?

That's my question also. What's wrong with Chavez? He isn't 'going along to get along'...he's exposing the globalists and the fact that globalism for the sake of globalism isn't a good thing...and worst of all..he's sharing the oil money with the PEOPLE of Venezuela....He isn't playing fast and loose with the economy of his country or his neighbors...as in inflation, deflation, etc and so on.

Everything I've read about Chavez had been POSITIVE...and BUSHey boy could take some lessons here. That's probably the biggest problem.

RR

The very fact that he thinks George Bush is NUTS gives him some credibility in my eyes!!

What is Chávez's crime that the US doesn't want him in power? Could it be that he is rejecting CAFTA and the FTAA? That makes him anti-globalists. What is wrong with that?

This is what I found out also when I looked him up a few weeks ago.
I think they are trying to paint him as some kind of tyrant so they can try to get him out of their way.
After all he is upsetting their grand scheme.

That's my question also. What's wrong with Chavez? He isn't 'going along to get along'...he's exposing the globalists and the fact that globalism for the sake of globalism isn't a good thing...and worst of all..he's sharing the oil money with the PEOPLE of Venezuela....He isn't playing fast and loose with the economy of his country or his neighbors...as in inflation, deflation, etc and so on.

The people of Venezuela seem to love him. More than I can say about our fearless leader who would sell out his own country.

'Would sell out his own country??" IS SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY!!

RR