Thread: Ugly, the American On TV, the immigration wars aren't as sim

From the Magazine | Essay
Ugly, the American
On TV, the immigration wars aren't as simple as politicians make them sound
By JAMES PONIEWOZIK
SUBSCRIBE TO TIMEPRINTE-MAILMORE BY AUTHOR

Posted Sunday, Nov. 19, 2006
Few prime-time TV characters are more American than Betty Suarez. On ABC's hit comedy-soap Ugly Betty, she's a fashion-magazine assistant who is distinctly unfashionable--chunky sweaters, frizzy hair, bear-trap braces--but succeeds through good old Yankee values like perseverance, optimism and hard work. Smart and sweet-hearted, she embodies the Puritan-Shaker-Quaker principle of valuing inner good over outer appearance. She's as Norman Rockwell as a chestnut-stuffed turkey. The actress who plays her is even named America Ferrera.

And yet--if you listen to some politicians and pundits--she should have been booted out of the country years ago. Betty's father is an illegal immigrant from Mexico. To hear Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan tell it, our fellow citizens are boiling with resentment against people like Betty. Taking our kids' spots in college! Helping themselves to our orthodontia! Stealing low-paid magazine jobs that rightfully belong to American trust-fund babies!

So why do some 14 million people a week watch and root for her? Because it's easier to hate a straw man--or a straw Mexican--than a person, even a fictional one. And because, as our pop culture shows, Americans' attitude toward foreigners is more complex than the build-a-fencers would make it.

On its face, the political debate is about illegal immigration--law, security and fairness. But this immigration panic, like past ones, taps into fears not limited to illegals. Who gets to say what American culture is? Is there enough room--and prosperity--to go around? Ugly Betty's overarching story is metaphorically about the same battle. Betty is an outsider at Mode magazine not just because she dresses badly but also because of things that have to do directly with her ethnicity. She grosses out her skinny, preening, (mostly) Anglo co-workers by bringing empanadas for lunch. Her features are broad and unmistakably Mesoamerican. (Ferrera is strikingly pretty in real life.) On her first day at work, she wears a hideous poncho with GUADALAJARA emblazoned on it.

Betty's scheming co-workers resent her in the same way immigration demagogues do: she's an interloper. Yet she succeeds--and even wins over some of her Mode enemies--for exactly that reason. Like generations of immigrants, legal or not, she brings fresh eyes, a tireless work ethic and a different perspective to revitalize a tired institution. (Like Borat, she's in the tradition of the outsider who helps America see itself.) Ironic, amid the effete fashionistas, that she's the one the audience identifies with as an everyday American.

It's no coincidence that Ugly Betty the series is itself an immigrant, a remake of a worldwide-sensation telenovela franchise. That's what makes our pop culture so vital: from TV to music to fashion, it is constantly transfused by foreigners who are able to out-American Americans.

ake reality TV. It embodies everything there is to love and despise about this country--ambition and greed, free-spiritedness and vulgarity, boldness and shamelessness. But it is an American staple that was pioneered overseas, much like pizza and gunpowder. American Idol is British. Big Brother, Dutch. Survivor, Swedish and imported by Mark Burnett, a Brit. And every week on reality shows, Americans embrace foreigners with Emma Lazarene openness--Heidi Klum and Simon Cowell, East European and Latin hoofers on Dancing with the Stars, Mexican boxers on The Contender and a Siberian drag queen on America's Got Talent.

Reality TV may be so hospitable to immigrants because it's a fun house mirror of the immigrant experience. You leave your comfort zone and prove your worth with little more than gumption and (maybe) talent. Wherever you come from, you embrace a new, anything-goes culture that values chutzpah over tradition and propriety. Emigré Burnett's shows, like The Apprentice, are full of Horatio Algerisms about industry and opportunity--not unlike Ugly Betty.

Political observers suggest that immigration law will be one of the areas where a Democratic Congress and a Republican White House may be able to reach consensus. Before they do, they should flick on a TV. They would see that you can pass laws and put up walls but it is much harder to erect a fence around your culture. (Just ask the French.) That while borders need to be protected, new blood is what makes this country the maddening, fantastic free-for-all that it is. And that what makes Betty ugly is, in the long run, what makes us America the beautiful.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... -2,00.html

Memo to James Poniewozik:

It's just a TV show, you idiot, written to invoke a specific response from the audience, just like this piece of crap column of yours was.

I like Carmen Miranda, but I don't wear fruit baskets
on my head.

The question should be:

Are the poor who have illegaly come into the United States and brought by family members who may be legal the responsibiity of the United States citizens who voted against having them here?

Or

Is improving the opportunities of the poor who have not come here yet and have some relatives who are living here legally the responsibility of those legal relatives?

The main stream corporate conglomerate (television) media is nothing more than a sounding board for advertisers who want to get their hands on the consumptive mentality of illegal immigrants.

Using "reality" or scripted sitcoms based on "cultural identity" to target disenfranchised audiences, these media perpetrators are trying to change the discourse of the country by making it seem acceptable to be an illegal, as long as "you work harder" to "enjoy your American Pie".

Never mentioned is the lack of integration, the ethnocentric and self-serving Latin mentality, and the inability of Illegals (and to a large degree LEGAL IMMIGRANTS!) to adhere to even basic tenets and language of life in the "adoptive" country! Not to mention the refusal to educate the offspring of said group in AMERICAN LAW, CIVICS, and GOVERNMENT.

The bottom line is a slow erosion of values and themes held dear by the majority of U.S Citzens; the continued development of the English language as the preferred method of communication, and the ongoing support of the needs of Legal American Citizens!

The trampling of these values is surely the effort of media manipulation. It certainly is a sad situation when I turn on my basic TV cable service, and see SEVEN different Spanish language Channels, TWO public service channels, and FIVE religious channels, and then be exposed to more (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT) garbage on the FOUR "public" network channels. I can only tell you one thing---I do not watch television any more! I leave you one thought in closing: WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ARE CALLED "PROGRAMS"?