Thread: CT-ICE Cases Melt Away

ICE Cases Melt Away
by Thomas MacMillan | June 8, 2009 7:36 AM

A judge has dismissed a case against four immigrants caught up in a controversial Fair Haven raid, saying the feds trampled on their rights.

Judge Michael W. Straus of U.S. Immigration Court in Hartford threw out the cases against four immigrants swept up in the June 2007 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid. He ruled that government agents were in “egregious violationâ€

THis is the only country on the planet that engages in this nonsense. Stop mucking around and deport these illegals. How many Yalies represented the government, or the law abiding legal residents of CT?

This is one of the few countries in the world that actually grants constitutional rights to non-citizens. If you ask me, they should not be entitled to 4th amendment protection in the first place.

If anything is to change and we are to salvage our quality of life, we need to take down the existing power structure that shields illegals and promotes illegal cheap labor - VOTE THEM OUT.

This was a witch hunt and I wouldn't have testified either.

The agents failed to ask preliminary questions that might demonstrate probable cause or at least reasonable suspicion. “

ICE agents told a different story of what had happened. They claimed that they had asked consent to enter, and followed appropriate procedures.

Now it comes down to agents protecting themselves by not testifying and illegal aliens re-writing history, when they got to court.

The immigration attorney's, through the courts are trying to create illegal alien sanctuaries out of their dwellings. In other words, if they are at home, you can't touch them without a warrant. Making on the ground probable cause a tricky matter and handcuffing officers.

This is an attempt to grant Constitutional rights to foreign nationals.

Dixie

Gringo_in_Miami wrote:

If you ask me, they should not be entitled to 4th amendment protection in the first place.

I agree.

Dixie wrote:

Now it comes down to agents protecting themselves by not testifying and illegal aliens re-writing history, when they got to court.

More importantly, the court is setting precedent that can be used in subsequent similar cases.

if appealed it goes to the second court of appeals
and guess who is one of the judges there........

thats right, sonia sotomayor

jamesw62 wrote:

if appealed it goes to the second court of appeals
and guess who is one of the judges there........

thats right, sonia sotomayor

Oh joy.