Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    WA: Gov moves to deport illegal immigrants in prisons

    Last updated May 19, 2009 7:12 p.m. PT

    Gov moves to deport illegal immigrants in prisons
    By MANUEL VALDES
    ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

    SEATTLE -- Gov. Chris Gregoire is moving forward with clearing Washington prisons of illegal immigrants to save money, but at what may be a slower rate than originally planned after lawmakers failed to pass a bill that would have hastened the process.

    In a letter sent last week to the state Department of Corrections, Gregoire outlined the state's approach to transferring illegal immigrant prisoners to federal custody. Her proposal, though, does not give the state as much authority as the original bill.

    The slower rate of transferring prisoners to federal custody may also mean less savings for taxpayers because not as many prisoners are expected to be moved to immigration authorities.

    "Time equals money here, so as long as we have to house them, it runs up additional charges for the state of Washington," Department of Corrections Secretary Eldon Vail said Tuesday.

    The original bill aimed to save the state $8 million in the next two-year budget cycle. The measure was part of a slew of bills to cut state costs in the face of a $9 billion deficit.

    The bill's demise left an $8 million gap in the Department of Corrections' budget. Vail said state budget writers assumed the bill would pass, and now the department has to fill the budget hole. He added that it's not known how much the department will be able to recoup.

    Earlier, Vail said there are about 350 prisoners in Washington who would be eligible to be transferred. On average, he said, it costs the state $90 a day to imprison an inmate.

    The bill would have allowed the Department of Corrections more flexibility in transferring illegal immigrant inmates. Now, Vail said, the department will have to coordinate with prosecutors and judges to work out a system in which the state asks for early release of inmates.

    Originally, the state had considered copying an Arizona program in which corrections workers would have been trained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help process inmates suspected of being in the country illegally.

    In her letter, Gregoire moved away from such a plan.

    The "federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over the determination of immigration status and deportation activities," Gregoire wrote. "At no time shall our state Department of Corrections or its staff be delegated a decision-making role."

    Gregoire also said that the Department of Corrections should provide access to information on obtaining legal representation to any inmate being considered for transfer. The governor made it clear that the state would not join in ICE's rapid removal program.

    For immigrant advocates, the shift in policy was welcome news. From the beginning, the main concern for immigration groups was protecting due process. Deportation procedures are conducted under a different court system than criminal cases. In many cases, legal representation is hard to obtain and immigrants who may be eligible to stay in the country end up signing deportation papers, advocates argue.

    "We're not opposed to the underlying scheme, but we wanted to make sure there's a due process all along," said Shankar Narayan, legislative director for Washington's ACLU chapter.

    For most of the legislative session, the two bills relating to clearing the way for the state to remove illegal immigrant prisoners cruised through committees and the Senate floor. However, lawmakers did not begin considering final passage of the measure until the waning hours of the session. Then gridlock hit - and other bills took priority.

    Meanwhile, several lawmakers in the House introduced a handful of amendments, which helped shelve the legislation as the session ran out of time.

    "One of the concerns that I was trying to address through the amendment was to point out that the policy would affect not only individuals without proper documentation, it would also affect permanent legal residents as well as U.S. citizens," said Rep. Sharon Tomiko Santos, D-Seattle.

    She added: "So while it's convenient to talk about it as a measure that is intended to address this so-called illegal alien offender, it misses the understanding that individuals who are here legally with proper documentation, who may mistakenly be arrested for a felony charge, are considered automatically deportable."

    Vail said his department is in talks with ICE to create an agreement between the state and the agency, but that none has been reached yet.

    www.seattlepi.com
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    In her letter, Gregoire moved away from such a plan.

    The "federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over the determination of immigration status and deportation activities," Gregoire wrote. "At no time shall our state Department of Corrections or its staff be delegated a decision-making role."

    Gregoire also said that the Department of Corrections should provide access to information on obtaining legal representation to any inmate being considered for transfer. The governor made it clear that the state would not join in ICE's rapid removal program.
    Then keep paying to house them in jail and shut up! Would've been alot less expensive to join ICE's rapid removal program. Oh well, you made your bed, now lie in it.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    Miguelina wrote:

    Then keep paying to house them in jail and shut up! Would've been alot less expensive to join ICE's rapid removal program. Oh well, you made your bed, now lie in it.
    Yeah, what she said!

    Furthermore, please don't start whining when the rest of the nations taxpaying populace quits subsidizing Washington's incarceration of illegal aliens. The way I see it, each individual state should do all it can to rid the state of its illegal alien population. The way to force thier hand (IMO) is to end government subsidy (our money) to the states for illegal alien incarceration. Once the states are forced to face the issue with out outside help, they'll then find a solution.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    I think they should have to do their time in their own country, at their expense....and if we find out they did not do their time, cut the country off of aid immediately! if they do not take their citizens back cut off trade and aid! it is time to quit screwing around.
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •