Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    jwc8888's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1

    Washington Post - Business Challenges Immigration Rule

    Link to Washington Post article regarding law suits to stop DHS attempts at law enforcement:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100101653.html

    Will this be another situation where immigration laws/rules will end up not being enforced?

    "No match letters" and terminations sounds like a good idea to me. How about charging them with using a counterfeit Social Security card and making restitution to the individuals whose identity they stole. How would you like it if $30,000 or $40,000 got reported to the IRS as taxable income under your SSN?

    Other idea: why not get a list of companies supporting this law suit and send ICE over to visit now? Most of the companies filing suit probably have 20 employees with the same SSN.

    Is there any way for ALIPAC and its' members to influence the outcome of such lawsuits? Or, is it just a wait and see situation?

    It would seem like some type of "Enforce Existing Laws" or "One Small Step for Enforcement" campaign outside the courthouse would not hurt.

    Isn't San Francisco somewhat of a Sanctuary City? Is this a good place to have this case go to trial? How do we know the judge who will be hearing the case is here legally?

    Can ALIPAC file suits to have existing laws enforced in favorable jurisdictions?

    The outcome of the case will have a major impact on the enforcement of existing immigration laws. This is one of the few examples where there is an indication of DHS making some sort of effort to at least resolve problems with illegals who use fake Social Security Numbers.

    It is the same old problem, laws on the books that are challenged or go un-enforced. Where did this whole thing of I don't like that law or regulation so I'm filing a law suit get started?

    I have a good cause for legal action: doesn't the Consititution provide American citizens some level of protection from foreign invaders. I'm not feeling it. Or is that the 2nd Amendment where we have the right to protect ourselves?

    Oh well ..... the Idiocracy moves forward

  2. #2
    Senior Member sippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    3,798
    It is the same old problem, laws on the books that are challenged or go un-enforced. Where did this whole thing of I don't like that law or regulation so I'm filing a law suit get started?
    Welcome JWC!

    This basically started with all the bleeding heart liberal judges appointed during the Clinton administration, which is one more reason NOT TO VOTE FOR BILLARY.

    You may want to PM William Gheen regarding your other questions. It would be fun to have a focus campaign against these lame liberal judges who don't seem to think the law needs to be enforced.
    "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results is the definition of insanity. " Albert Einstein.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    722

    Re: Washington Post - Business Challenges Immigration Rule

    Quote Originally Posted by jwc8888
    Link to Washington Post article regarding law suits to stop DHS attempts at law enforcement:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100101653.html

    Will this be another situation where immigration laws/rules will end up not being enforced?

    "No match letters" and terminations sounds like a good idea to me. How about charging them with using a counterfeit Social Security card and making restitution to the individuals whose identity they stole. How would you like it if $30,000 or $40,000 got reported to the IRS as taxable income under your SSN?

    Other idea: why not get a list of companies supporting this law suit and send ICE over to visit now? Most of the companies filing suit probably have 20 employees with the same SSN.

    Is there any way for ALIPAC and its' members to influence the outcome of such lawsuits? Or, is it just a wait and see situation?

    It would seem like some type of "Enforce Existing Laws" or "One Small Step for Enforcement" campaign outside the courthouse would not hurt.

    Isn't San Francisco somewhat of a Sanctuary City? Is this a good place to have this case go to trial? How do we know the judge who will be hearing the case is here legally?

    Can ALIPAC file suits to have existing laws enforced in favorable jurisdictions?

    The outcome of the case will have a major impact on the enforcement of existing immigration laws. This is one of the few examples where there is an indication of DHS making some sort of effort to at least resolve problems with illegals who use fake Social Security Numbers.

    It is the same old problem, laws on the books that are challenged or go un-enforced. Where did this whole thing of I don't like that law or regulation so I'm filing a law suit get started?

    I have a good cause for legal action: doesn't the Consititution provide American citizens some level of protection from foreign invaders. I'm not feeling it. Or is that the 2nd Amendment where we have the right to protect ourselves?

    Oh well ..... the Idiocracy moves forward

    Now see, if you were caught using someone else's library card, the police would probably throw you in prison. But illegal aliens apparently have all sorts of special priveleges that the rest of us can only dream about.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •