Thread: Workers Who Use Fake Social Securities Can’t Be Fired

Workers Who Use Fake Social Securities Can’t Be Fired
Fri, 06/20/2008 - 11:11 — Judicial Watch Blog


For the second time this week an appellate court has reversed a lower court decision to rule in favor of those who violate the nation’s immigration laws, this time making it illegal to fire undocumented workers who use fake Social Security numbers to get their job.

On the heels of an Idaho Supreme Court ruling that said an illegal immigrant can still be a legal resident entitled to free public medical care, a federal appellate court in California said that employees can’t be fired merely because they use fake Social Security numbers.

The case involves 48 Los Angeles janitors who submitted Social Security numbers that differed from the numbers on the government’s federal database. In other words, they used fake numbers to get a job they weren’t entitled to. The janitorial company, Aramark, gave the illegal workers three days to clear up the problem but only 15 did. The other 33 were fired.

A federal judge sided with Aramark but the janitors appealed to the Ninth U.S Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. The notoriously liberal court ordered Aramark to rehire the janitors with back pay, saying employees can’t be fired merely because the Social Security number they submit differs from the number on the government files.

In its decision, a three-judge panel wrote that a Social Security discrepancy “does not automatically mean that an employee is undocumented.â€

This is absolute proof this country has gone to hell and unless we get rid of these libidiot left wing socialist judges in our courts, there will be no redemption. They are intent on establishing socialism and anarchy, a trademark of the third world and it is well on it's way here.

I'm sickened by all this. It's getting really scary.

Originally Posted by zeezil

This is absolute proof this country has gone to hell and unless we get rid of these libidiot left wing socialist judges in our courts, there will be no redemption. They are intent on establishing socialism and anarchy, a trademark of the third world and it is well on it's way here.

Agreed Zee. But, if they are in appointed positiions, how is it possible to force them off the bench?

Those judges are a bunch of LUNATICS and need to be thrown in prison! UNREAL!

Issued days earlier, the Idaho ruling was equally bizarre. Although a state law prohibits giving public benefits to those who are not legal residents, the state’s Supreme Court ordered taxpayers in one county to pay for the costly medical care of an illegal immigrant because “the concept of residency does not distinguish between citizens and those who have entered this country illegally. “

The judge also said in his ruling that he had to rule this way because it happened prior to Idaho passing that law. Funny that this article doesn't mention that fact. Illegal aliens get no social benefits in Idaho since the law passed last year.

We should all burn our social security card, they are not worth a damn anyway......then we can just make up one and let them come and find 150 million Americans come tax season! That should make one hell of a mess out of the ss system they don't seem to give a damn about anyway!

The 'real' people's court strikes again -

appealed to the Ninth U.S Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. The notoriously liberal court ordered Aramark to rehire the janitors with back pay, saying employees can’t be fired merely because the Social Security number they submit differs from the number on the government files.

It's the 9th US Circuit Court in SF CA. <- That's the real problem.
They continue to do much damage to the country and it's citizens.

federal law penalizes employers only if they knowingly employ illegal immigrants

And here's the wiggle, weasel, loophole, (anyway you want to describe it) room. E-Verify NOW. No more excuses.

Populist wrote:

E-Verify NOW. No more excuses.

But Populist, didn't you catch the part of the ruling that said,"that requires more evidence than a mismatch in the Social Security database, which the court said was not designed for immigration enforcement" ? Doesn't that basically nullify any intended future use of E-Verify?