Thread: World's Gutter Governments To Sit In Judgment...

World's Gutter Governments To Sit In Judgment Over U.S. Human Rights Record
Diary Entry by Frederick Meekins

::::::::

No one is perfect. As such, at times correction and admonition may need to be promulgated to set the ethically concerned back on the right path.

When issued by those adhering to the high standards to which they profess, such criticism can be looked upon as a helpful corrective to assist equals in living up to their potential. However, when such accusations are leveled or sustained by those with no intentions of living up to the standard themselves, the maligned should turn the tables against such dubious defamers and expose just who it is that undermines dignity, order, and liberty.

According to a May 20, 2008 Washington Times article titled "U.N. Puts Its Scope On U.S. Racism", this world body has sent an envoy to the United States to gather information regarding racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and "related intolerance". According to others in the human rights industry, such as Freedom House, this category of protections does not limit itself to narrowly defined matters such as abridgements of free speech or mass killings and seizures of property but also includes healthcare, education, and equal justice for immigrants and minorities.

For starters, before we start badmouthing what is available in this great land for these particular classes of people (especially immigrants), perhaps we should take a look at the places from which the new arrivals came. For a toilet bowl might be a dramatic improvement if you just crawled up from the sewer. If they have it so poor here, why did they come here in the first place, and if it is not to their liking here, they are always free to go back.

But even of greater concern than the quality of quantifiable conditions ought to be how much of what the U.N. is investigating is more attitudinal in nature. While no one that loves justice and views each individual as a unique creature made in the image of God wants to see the rights of others infringed upon in terms of the individual being secure in the livelihood and possessions they are able to acquire for themselves, neither is it really the place of government or international institutions to infringe upon the ability of other individuals to think and express themselves in a free and minimally orderly manner. Civil society may be able to condemn certain beliefs from a moral standpoint, but it is not really the place of government to keep you from being as much of an ass as you want to be provided you keep your hands off the nose and the stuff of the guy next to you.

For example, the state has an interest in preventing instances of racial discrimination where an objective public accommodation has been denied. However, “xenophobia and related intoleranceâ€

When issued by those adhering to the high standards to which they profess, such criticism can be looked upon as a helpful corrective to assist equals in living up to their potential. However, when such accusations are leveled or sustained by those with no intentions of living up to the standard themselves, the maligned should turn the tables against such dubious defamers and expose just who it is that undermines dignity, order, and liberty.

Unfortunatly we have too many 3rd world people who want the benefits, but have no intention or desire to do the other things required. They aren't wanting to join in....they are wanting to punish and take. They don't want a path or a way to work yourself up.....they want it ALL and they want it NOW. They don't want to earn it.....they want it GIVEN to them.

What a Joke to say the least.And Obama wants to give the u.n. how many hundred billions of our tax dollars ?

And here we are, the largest contributor to the UN, and are getting blamed for crimes less worse that those in the countries of the membership. Let's just throw the whole organization out, nationalize the building since US taxpayers probably paid for the majority of the construction. I am sure Donald Trump would be able to turn it into condos.

Originally Posted by vortex

And here we are, the largest contributor to the UN, and are getting blamed for crimes less worse that those in the countries of the membership. Let's just throw the whole organization out, nationalize the building since US taxpayers probably paid for the majority of the construction. I am sure Donald Trump would be able to turn it into condos.

But then we'd just have to worry about extremists from one of the Member Nations blowing it up out of revenge 'cuz that's just how they roll