Thread: Q. Refuting Senate pro-outlaw polls

Hi, Gonna get some writer's cramp this weekend and hand-write letters to elected officials. In another message thread there was an article that the Senate got somebody to take a poll for them (whatever it was) with sample size 1100 and 71% pro-illegal. My guess is that Communist LaRaza had something to do with the poll taking

We all know that online poll after poll runs better than 90% pro-America or anti-lawbreaker.

Not particularly looking for numbers (unless you have em handy), but phrases or sentences or paragraphs that I can use to refute the pro-lawbreaker poll(s) that the senate will "hang their hats on."

Any help and advice sure will be appreciated.

Coto

Hi Coto,

Is there a link to this poll?

Annie

Originally Posted by noillegalimmigrationannie

Hi Coto,

Is there a link to this poll?

Annie

Hi Annie,
No link; i read about it in one of the Kay Bailey Hutchison posts here on ALIPAC. Seems that polls that the Senate uses never provide access. I think it said something like a polling company polled 1100 people and 71% favor amnesty or whatever. Naturally there is no info on the whereabouts of the poll.

Never mind the multitude of online and other polls that run 95%+ pro-America. Never mind the Lou Dobbs polls every weekday night that are 95%+ pro-America. If the Senate finds one Anti-American poll, that's the one they use.

You guys, here on Alipac, are far better writers than I am. Given that the Senate is using this left-wing, pro Communist, anti-American poll, I sense the need to contradict such nonsense in my letter writing.

Any advice from you guys sure will be appreciate.

Annie, I found one of the threads:

Senate Republicans leaders, meanwhile, are holding a few hearings of their own, but are mostly standing pat, knowing that recent polls show about 75 percent of Republicans support their immigration views.

http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... =hutchison

I don't know where they got their 75% of Republicans, maybe their counting the illegals (who vote illegally).

This is the kind of crap I should refute when I write to congress - because if a letter comes back to me it'll say something like "the majority of Americans demand comprehensive immigration reform." Translated to English that means amnesty and unconditional citizenship with pardons for criminals.

I was thinking about posting a question about their use of the word "comprehensive" over and over and over in their bs leftist rhetoric. I think that the real meaning of "comprehensive" is fool the public. Is this the definition?

Thanks,
Coto