Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    IT’S RIGGED



    IT’S RIGGED

    By Al Duncan
    February 25, 2011
    NewsWithViews.com

    Most now know that the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed), is a private central bank owned by International Bankers. Although the Fed masquerades as a Government institution it is no more a Government institution than Federal Express. Even though the Fed performs all the functions of a Central Bank, its name misleads the public into believing that it operates on their behalf.

    The U.S. Constitution clearly states in Article 1 Section 8 that: “The Congress shall have Power To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures,â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Thanks Airborn.

    "In regard to economic policy, socialism and communism are identical." Ludwig von Mises

    When people wonder why our politicians do the things they do, when they seem contrary to public will, common sense, or down right unconstitutional, and then wish to right things during the next election only to find themselves in the same corrupt boat again and again, then perhaps it is time to look in other directions, other than the political system itself, namely the economic system.

    It seems to me that the economic system dictates what type of political system people will have.

    You can not have communism or socialism without a economic system that will allow for such a political system. In other words the economic system in place determines the political system. That is in the pure sense, as systems can and do morph into others over time. But, I believe it is the economics that must take the lead. As a political transition without the supporting economic system taking the lead, will fail. When the political system travels and morphs into another political system, the economic system will allready be there, established and waiting.

    Our founders gave us a Republican form of government and a monetary system to be governed by the political system. A monetary system based upon a standard. A standard is fixed and hard, it is as honest as one can get. All economic activity, and thus all political activity must conform to, and act according to that standard, not so much to the whims of men as in a fiat system that was sold as "elastic." So your political system will become "elastic" as well. Your Constitution must conform to the "elastic" whims of the fiat. The "elastic" effects go beyond all hard and steady walls of the standard and the fixed. Your Constitution becomes a "living and breathing" document, it becomes "elastic."

    Karl Marx explained the role of money and politics as, "Money plays the largest part in determining the course of history." So it would seem that the monetary and not the political that would take the lead. The money buys the politics.

    Politics and religion are to play a role in keeping in check the travel or morphing of the economic. How have we done?

    "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and viscous, they have more need of masters." Ben Franklin

    JMO

  3. #3
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Like a giant octopus, the tentacles of corruption have infiltrated the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judicial branches of our government. The bankers, the corporate heads and the public officials are drinking from the same financial trough, funded by the unsuspecting public. Thus, an ominous darkness is engulfing America like a fog, and I don’t see even a flicker of light able to dispel it.
    Perhaps this is what Georges was talking about....................."A collective tyrant, spread over the length and breadth of the land, is no more acceptable than a single tyrant esconced on his thrown." Georges Clemenceau

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •