Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
11-18-2011, 05:42 PM #1
36 States Mulling Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients
36 States Mulling Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients
By Tara Dodrill | Yahoo! Contributor Network – 4 mins 36 secs ago...
Multiple states and pending federal legislation may soon change the nature of America's government entitlement programs. Proposed laws in nearly 36 states and U.S. Senator David Vitter's Drug Free Families Act would mandate drug testing for welfare recipients and participants in other taxpayer funded social services programs. Florida passed a similar law last month, but testing is temporarily halted due to a lawsuit alleging Fourth Amendment violations of unreasonable search and seizure.
Drug Free Families Act
Senate Bill 83 seeks to amend Social Security Act Title IV to include a drug testing requirement for Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program participants. If the federal law is passed, pending legislation in a growing number of states will no longer be necessary. The law would require any state offering financial assistance to adult recipients for illegal drug use. Entitlement program assistance will be denied if an individual tests positive or is convicted of a drug-related crime. Aid cannot be restored until a drug treatment program is completed and the potential recipient tests negative for drugs during a 6-month period after treatment.
State Drug Testing Legislation
Florida Governor Rick Scott campaigned on the issue of drug testing for welfare and signed a bill initiating the program into law in late October. Testing began several weeks ago but ended when a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) temporarily ended the practice. Language contained in the executive order mirrors that in the proposed federal legislation. Florida's law also includes mandatory drug testing of all state employees. A final ruling has not been issued in the lawsuit, which cites Fourth Amendment concerns, but is expected by the end of the year. Additional states with pending or preliminary welfare drug testing measures include Louisiana, Oklahoma, Alabama, Ohio, Missouri, Arizona and Indiana.
Michigan Welfare Drug Testing Precedent
Michigan attempted to implement a mandatory welfare drug testing program in 2000. The law was opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union all the way to the Supreme Court. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority decision in the case. Ginsburg stated that drug testing was an act of unreasonable search and seizure and violated Fourth Amendment protections. She further stated the state can only impose drug tests in cases where public safety is at risk.
The precedent set in the nearly decade old Michigan case is being swung by the ACLU like a heavy club in the pending Florida case. Defense attorneys representing the single father who filed an invasion of privacy complaint point to Gingburg's comments as a reason to terminate drug testing of TANF recipients in Florida. A provision in the law allows the state to share positive test results with law enforcement and a drug abuse hotline.
http://news.yahoo.com/Last edited by JohnDoe2; 01-09-2012 at 09:21 PM.
NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
11-18-2011, 06:23 PM #2
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Northern California (moved back to fight for our land and freedom)
- Posts
- 666
What about all those employers that are requiring drug testing. Is that and illegal search?
There was a nurse in FL that kept records on newborns of drug addicts and all the health issues, including the cost to the taxpayer. She got a law passed to require expectant mothers on welfare to be drug-tested. If on drugs they had to get into a program for the health of the unborn. The ACLU got it tossed. Their argument was the mother's rights supersede the unborn.
The ACLU will get these thrown out too. No one really cares about the tax payer.
-
11-19-2011, 11:11 AM #3
every welfare in the state should have this .employers also should
also be tested
you would see the welfare would go down
you are right no one care about the tax payer . at all
No amnestyor dream act that outJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Durbin pushes voting rights for illegal aliens without public...
04-25-2024, 09:10 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters