Thread: "Anglo" Muslim sues Ventura Sheriff over Hijab Removal

Originally Posted by Judy

My mom and other members of my family have read ALIPAC posts ever since I joined 13 years ago.

Then why do you bring their private affairs here to be scrutinized?

Originally Posted by Judy

Do members of your family read your posts?

Yes! But I do not identify them for my examples!

Originally Posted by jtdc

Then why do you bring their private affairs here to be scrutinized?

Yes! But I do not identify them for my examples!

Why would my Mom be "scrutinized" because she had a stroke and her driver's license expired?

Originally Posted by Judy

Why would my Mom be "scrutinized" because she had a stroke and her driver's license expired?

She is NOT scrutinized...you scrutinized her. There are exemptions and affidavits for people who are unable to get out. There are rules and procedures in place for that.

Originally Posted by Beezer

She is NOT scrutinized...you scrutinized her. There are exemptions and affidavits for people who are unable to get out. There are rules and procedures in place for that.

Then why were you wailing about "who doesn't have a photo ID"?

I gave you a real example of a real person who is a Republican who doesn't currently have a photo ID because her driver's license expired after an illness. In her circumstance, no photo ID is required for her to vote. If it were, she wouldn't vote. That is just a simple fact of the matter. If she didn't vote because she didn't get a voter ID, then the result is voter suppression, a reduced vote as a result of the new requirement. That's just what it is by definition in our language, and no amount of insults, rudeness, mockery, inquisition or other bad behavior is going to change that.

Originally Posted by Judy

I gave you a real example of a real person who is a Republican who doesn't currently have a photo ID because her driver's license expired after an illness. In her circumstance, no photo ID is required for her to vote.

So it was an irrelevant example!

Originally Posted by Judy

If it were, she wouldn't vote. That is just a simple fact of the matter.

Her choice!

Originally Posted by Judy

If she didn't vote because she didn't get a voter ID, then the result is voter suppression, a reduced vote as a result of the new requirement.

And that would be a good thing if it suppresses voting by non-citizens!

Originally Posted by jtdc

So it was an irrelevant example!

Apparently not. This thread is on page14 because of it.

Originally Posted by Judy

Apparently not. This thread is on page14 because of it.

Checkmate!

You really need to get some aspirin for that "headache"!