Thread: Arizona Rep. Gosar reintroduces bill ending LEGAL IMMUNITY for vaccine makers

Arizona Rep. Gosar reintroduces bill ending LEGAL IMMUNITY for vaccine makers

07/28/2025 // Ramon Tomey // 70 Views

Tags: . vaccines, badhealth, badmedicine, big government, Big Pharma, freedom, health freedom, HR 4668, HR 9828, lawsuits, legal immunity, liability, Liberty, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, paul gosar, vaccine damage, vaccine injury, Vaccine Injury Compensations Program, vaccine wars

• Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) reintroduced HR 4668, which aims to repeal legal protections shielding vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, allowing injured individuals to sue directly in state or federal court.
• Since 1986, vaccine makers have been largely immune from liability under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), requiring harmed individuals to seek compensation through the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) – a system criticized as slow and inefficient.
• The bill arrives amid heightened concerns over vaccine safety, particularly regarding COVID-19 shots, and seeks to bypass the underperforming Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which has approved only 39 out of nearly 14,000 COVID-related claims.
• Proponents argue ending immunity would hold manufacturers accountable and improve transparency, while opponents warn it could disrupt vaccine supply, citing fears from the 1980s about litigation driving companies out of production.
• The bill has 28 cosponsors and bipartisan recognition of flaws in current compensation systems, but its prospects remain uncertain.

U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) has reintroduced a bill ending legal immunity for vaccine makers amid rising scrutiny regarding the safety of various injections.
For nearly 40 years, vaccine manufacturers in the U.S. have operated with an unusual legal safeguard: they are shielded from most lawsuits, even when their products cause harm. But Gosar, a former dentist, is now challenging that legal protection.
On July 22, the congressman for the Grand Canyon State reintroduced HR 4668 – a derivative of an earlier bill he authored. "Big Pharma should not be given a free pass for injuries caused by their dangerous vaccines," he declared.
During the previous congressional session, Gosar introduced the similar HR 9828, also known as the End the Vaccine Carveout Act. It aimed to remove that he calls an "unfair" liability carveout for the pharmaceutical industry, but this was stalled at the lower chamber. HR 9828 seeks to amend federal law to allow injured individuals to sue vaccine makers directly, a right stripped away in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). (Related: New bill dismantles vaccine liability shield, seeks justice for the injured.)
The push comes amid heightened scrutiny of vaccine safety, particularly following widespread Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccinations and reports of severe side effects from these injections. Under the NCVIA, those alleging harm from vaccines must first seek compensation through the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) – a no-fault system critics argue is slow, opaque, and rarely delivers adequate redress.
Lawmakers demand a stop to Big Pharma's "free pass" on vaccine injuries

Since its inception, the VICP has paid approximately $5 billion across 25,000 claims. But Gosar contends the process is stacked against claimants. "Satisfying these requirements is practically an impossibility," his office stated, citing the high burden of proof required to succeed in a claim.
The bill would dismantle key provisions of both the NCVIA and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005, which further expanded liability protections during public health emergencies. Gosar's legislation would retroactively allow claims dating back to VICP's 1988 launch and permit those injured by COVID-19 shots to bypass the beleaguered Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). That system has compensated just 39 out of 13,836 COVID-related claims filed as of June.
The debate over vaccine liability gained renewed attention last week during a Senate hearing on vaccine injuries, where even staunch pro-vaccine lawmakers like Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) acknowledged the need for reform. "The government has decided that this particular industry gets a free pass," remarked Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-OH).
Advocates agree, with Children’s Health Defense CEO Mary Holland calling the NCVIA a "catastrophic error" that removed accountability from drug manufacturers. Critics, however, warn that rolling back protections could destabilize vaccine supply – a concern dating back to the 1980s when lawsuits threatened to shutter production. Defenders of the current system argue vaccines undergo rigorous safety testing and serious side effects are exceedingly rare.
Yet Gosar and supporters counter that forcing manufacturers to face litigation, as in other industries, would incentivize greater transparency and safety.
Visit HealthFreedom.news for more similar stories.
Watch Dawn Richardson revealing that the U.S. government has paid out more than $5.22 billion to vaccine victims through the VICP in this clip.

This video is from the DWP97048 channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:

Vaccine makers could FINALLY lose liability protections, subjecting them to lawsuits for their injurious products.
Manufacturers of vaccines, the most dangerous “medicine” on earth, may finally lose their “immunity” to lawsuits thanks to HR 9828.=
If Rep. Thomas Massie can get this new legislation passed, Covid-19 VACCINE MAKERS will be liable for injuries and deaths caused by DEADLY CLOT SHOTS.
Sources include:
InfoWars.com
ChildrensHealthDefense.org
KAWC.org
Brighteon.com

Arizona Rep. Gosar reintroduces bill ending LEGAL IMMUNITY for vaccine makers – NaturalNews.com

New bill seeks to strip vaccine manufacturers of liability protections

07/29/2025 // Belle Carter // 1.2K Views

Tags: . vaccines, accountability, badhealth, badmedicine, big government, Big Pharma, chemical violence, covid-19, Dangerous Medicine, End the Vaccine Carveout Act, liability, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, pharmaceutical fraud, progress, vaccine damage, Vaccine injuries, vaccine manufacturers, vaccine wars, VICP

• The End the Vaccine Carveout Act was introduced in Congress on July 23 by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), aiming to remove liability protections for vaccine manufacturers and potentially expose them to numerous lawsuits over alleged injuries.
• The bill seeks to amend the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which currently shields manufacturers from most vaccine injury lawsuits. This act was originally enacted to ensure a stable vaccine supply by limiting manufacturers' liability.
• The proposed legislation would allow individuals to bypass the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and file civil suits directly against manufacturers in state or federal court. This change would eliminate the current requirement for claimants to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief.
• Supporters argue that the bill will increase accountability by allowing injured individuals to seek legal justice and compensation. Opponents, including industry analysts, warn that it could lead to increased litigation costs, potential disruptions in vaccine production and reduced public health outcomes.
• The bill's introduction comes amid scrutiny of public confidence in vaccines, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic.

A new bill introduced in Congress aims to remove liability protections for vaccine manufacturers, potentially opening them up to a flood of lawsuits over alleged injuries. H.R. 4668, known as the End the Vaccine Carveout Act, was introduced on July 23 by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ).
The bill seeks to amend the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which currently shields manufacturers from most lawsuits related to vaccine injuries. The legislation was enacted to ensure a stable vaccine supply by limiting manufacturers' liability. Under this law, individuals who believe they have been injured by a vaccine must first file a petition with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This program, however, has faced criticism for its lengthy backlog, with judgments often taking years to be rendered.
The new bill would allow individuals to bypass the VICP and file civil suits directly against manufacturers in state or federal court. This change could significantly alter the legal landscape, as it would remove the current requirement for claimants to exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial relief.
Gosar argues that the existing liability protections unfairly shield pharmaceutical companies from accountability.
"Current immunity provisions unfairly shielding Big Pharma from the harms caused by their products prevent those injured by vaccines from pursuing a civil lawsuit," Gosar stated on July 24. He emphasized that the bill would "put patients over profits" by allowing injured individuals to seek legal justice and compensation.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was a response to a crisis in the 1980s when several lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers threatened to cause vaccine shortages and reduce vaccination rates. The legislation was designed to balance the need for vaccine safety with the necessity of maintaining a robust vaccine supply.
The act established the VICP, a no-fault alternative to traditional tort litigation, to provide compensation to individuals injured by certain vaccines. The program has paid out billions of dollars in compensation since its inception, but critics argue that it is not sufficiently accessible or timely.
The introduction of H.R. 4668 comes at a time when public confidence in vaccines is under scrutiny, particularly in the wake of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Advocates for the bill argue that it will increase transparency and accountability, ultimately leading to safer vaccines. Opponents, however, warn that it could have unintended consequences, such as increased litigation costs and potential disruptions in vaccine production. (Related: Kennedy removes entire CDC vaccine panel in dramatic shake-up.)
Support and Opposition

Support for the bill has come from various advocacy groups, including the nonprofit Children's Health Defense. Mary Holland, the organization's president, expressed strong support for the legislation, stating that it would ensure vaccines are held to the highest standards of safety and effectiveness.
"This is exactly what we need to ensure that vaccines are as safe as possible," Holland said in a statement.
On the other hand, the pharmaceutical industry has remained largely silent on the matter. PhRMA, a trade group representing vaccine manufacturers, did not respond to a request for comment. However, industry analysts suggest that manufacturers are likely concerned about the potential impact on their businesses.
Historically, the pharmaceutical industry has argued that liability protections are essential to encourage innovation and investment in vaccine development. They contend that without these protections, manufacturers might be less inclined to produce vaccines, which could lead to shortages and reduced public health outcomes.
The End the Vaccine Carveout Act represents a significant shift in the approach to vaccine liability. If passed, it could have far-reaching implications for both the pharmaceutical industry and public health. While proponents argue that it will enhance accountability and safety, opponents warn of potential disruptions to vaccine supply and increased litigation.
Watch the video below that talks about how childhood vaccines have not gone through safety trials.

This video is from The People Of The Qur'an (TPQ) channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:

New study links children's COVID vaccines to autoimmune risks as HHS halts routine recommendations.
Vaccine data in Japan reveals deadly trend: Deaths PEAK with each COVID jab – unvaccinated protected and vindicated.
FDA limits COVID-19 vaccine approvals to elderly and high-risk groups, but millions still eligible.
Sources include:

TheEpochTimes.com
Congress.gov
Gosar.House.gov
Brighteon.com

New bill seeks to strip vaccine manufacturers of liability protections – NaturalNews.com