Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,266

    Army “Nutter” Ray Odierno Goes “Full Stalin” at CFR

    Latest Posts:
    Army "Nutter" Ray Odierno Goes "Full Stalin" at CFR



    Tuesday, June 5th, 2012 | Posted by Gordon Duff
    Army “Nutter” Ray Odierno Goes “Full Stalin” at CFR
    79

    Please Suggest an Appropriate Caption

    America’s “Dimwit General” Calls for Martial Law

    ———————————————
    By Gordon Duff and Senior Army Staffers (Anon)



    I was sent the initial article written by Joe Wolverton from the New American, who I credit but included is more than a comment or two on Army Chief of Staff Raymond Odierno.

    There is an agreement within his own staff and those who have ever served with him, General Odierno is the biggest “horses ass’ to have worn an American uniform since Custer. The term his staff uses, to be quite exact is “dangerous dimwit.”

    This week, Odierno, a member of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations, a group consisting of failed academics, rap artists, former hockey players who too many high sticks to the head and delusional dimwits like Odierno, advocated the use of the Army any time local police need help.

    Man beats dog? Call in the army, hell, get a raptor overhead, get a company of Rangers, kill the man, the dog and spray his lawn with Agent Orange to boot.

    If only I were making it up:

    “Where appropriate we will also dedicate active-duty forces, especially those with niche skills and equipment, to provide civilian officials with a robust set of reliable and rapid response options.”…Odierno

    Because of fear of retaliation, comments I will use as quotes will be anonymous. Here is an interpretation of how Odierno’s views, taken in light of his oath, manage to stay from both reality and legality:

    “The jurisdiction of domestic military enforcement “to keep the homeland safe from domestic disasters”…in time of ..public danger” [5th Amendment] is NOT enumerated in the Army Claus [ Article I Section 8 CI 12], it belongs to “the Militia of the several States” [Article II, Section CI 1], composed of the whole “People of the several States” [Article I Section 1 CI 2], enumerated “..to execute the Laws [Article 1 Section 8 CI 12] .. necessary to the security of a free State.. “[2nd Amendment]. Jurisdiction is additionally confirmed by “The powers..reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” [10th Amendment].
    It is past due time for the several States legislatures to each revitalize their Militia institution and comply with their enumerated duty. Both the reasoning behind the constitutionalism and history have articulated the consequences of professional soldiers in a standing army forced against the citizenry.”

    Odierno, known to have been the worst commander ever to have served in Afghanistan, out of hundreds, never picked up on the “American thing.” They must not teach it at the CRF or the idiot academy that put him over others.
    Wolverton points out:

    In an article penned by Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Raymond T. Odierno, the CFR would see the Army used to address “challenges in the United States itself” in order to keep the homeland safe from domestic disasters, including terrorist attacks. Odierno writes:

    Where appropriate we will also dedicate active-duty forces, especially those with niche skills and equipment, to provide civilian officials with a robust set of reliable and rapid response options.

    That’s right. Should the sheriff suspect that a particular citizen in his county poses a threat to security and feels he doesn’t have the proper “skills and equipment” to deal with the situation, he can just call out the U.S. Army and bring a “rapid response” force that is robust enough to eliminate the problem.

    These are not the musings of an unknown academic written in an obscure journal of little importance. These are the black-and-white plans for “building a flexible force” as laid out by the man in charge and published for all the world to read by the people who may have put him there.

    In order to justify this new (and illegal) mission for the Army, General Odierno points to three “major changes” that have precipitated the re-tasking of the troops: First, “declining budgets due to the country’s worsened fiscal situation; second, “a shift in emphasis to the Asia-Pacific region; and third, a “broadening of focus from counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, and training of partners to shaping the strategic environment, preventing the outbreak of dangerous regional conflicts, and improving the army’s readiness to respond in force to a range of complex contingencies worldwide.”

    There are so many things wrong with every one of these points that each deserves its own article focused solely on its deconstruction. Unfortunately, there is only so much space and each of these considerations has one critical flaw in common: no constitutional authority for any of it.

    Start with the woeful economic state of American affairs. Odierno lists this first among his unholy trinity of reasons the army must “transition” from its traditional role to one with a wider domestic and international scope.

    Perhaps it has escaped General Odierno’s attention, but the decline of America’s economic fortunes may be in some significant part tied to the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that siphon about $13 billion per month from the U.S. Treasury. Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, estimates are that Congress has approved a total of $1.283 trillion in military operations, (Editorial note: Newer accounting more than triples these figures) base security, reconstruction, foreign aid, embassy costs, and veterans’ health care spread over three operations: Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Afghanistan and other counter terror operations; Operation Noble Eagle (ONE), providing enhanced security at military bases; and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).

    There is a certain macabre irony to the claim by a military leader that his troops are forced to adapt to stringent budget considerations partially brought about by the use of his troops as the tip of America’s sword of empire.

    General Odierno’s third “major change” is the need to use the Army to solve complex international conflicts. Again, these conflicts and the solutions to them are made more complex by the fact that there is not a single syllable in the Constitution that grants the President or Congress the authority to deploy American armed forces to work out the world’s difficult dilemmas.

    We have even more suggestions from Odierno’s own staff. For a moron, he manages to get some realistic people around him, I have to credit him for that. This is what they suggest:

    We also need courageous federal legislators to explicitly reassert Posse Comitatus, along with the renunciation of Bush’s Military Commission Act (which began to breach Posse Comitatus).

    Furthermore, it is now a serious matter for both states and Counties to pass legislation and /or resolutions assuring the citizens under their protection that they will not allow any officer to breach the legal, separate jurisdictions – with their delegated, enumerated powers – that have helped safeguard a free society, “with liberty and justice for all”.

    The importance of state-level legislators has taken on a new importance in the upcoming elections. Candidates should be explicitly asked their position on this issue.

    Furthermore, we could hope for an increase in the current and former military, police, and other civil service personnel joining Oathkeepers.org. – Pat Henry

    General Odierno should be arrested, stripped of his rank, charged with treason, tried and shot as a traitor to our country.

    And then we should go after the CFR and the Trilateral Commission members and arrest them for treason and confiscate their ill gotten gains.

    CONCLUSION

    I could leave this as a simple attack on the Army for promoting an idiot. Our new JCOS is top rate, we have a president who can sink a 3 pointer one in five tries, a record and we haven’t lost a half dozen nuclear weapons under this administration like we did with the last one.

    What we still have is organizations like the CFR, an embarrassment to all of us. Unless you are a reporter who dropped out of a community college with a 1.5 GPA, talking to anyone at the CRF other than Brzezinski is like discussing physics with a chipmunk.

    I read their analysis papers occasionally, thankful for that speed reading class. Recognizing delusional idiocy and mediocrity takes only seconds when you are a speed reader. God bless Evelyn Wood.

    I am adding my own ideas. First of all, a military that has lost a string of wars, pushed into them by moronic Wall Street shills, needs to play Gomer Pyle, not Wyatt Earp. Unless the military wants to cut us all in on their trillion dollar heroin profit from Afghanistan, they can take their technology and let Israel keep peddling it to the commies. They deserve it. We don’t.

    Back in 1942, General Marshall saw fit to remove 70% of our military officers as unfit for duty. Odierno would have had the famous Marshall “boot print on the backside” day number one.

    Over the last decade we have seen every imaginable war crime, massive drug running, 30,000 soldiers illegally “cashiered” to cheat them out of pensions and benefits, 500,000 veterans, recent only, join the queue already 1 million strong, applying for disability benefits and, most outrageous of all, we managed to kill the number 2 leader of Al Qaeda today.

    There is a problem with that. Yesterday, the “famous terrorist leader” we just killed with a drone strike didn’t exist. Nobody had heard of him.

    We made the whole thing up.

    You see, it’s an election year here in the US and we are likely to do just about anything, even appoint morons like Ray Ordierno as Chief of Staff of our Army just so he can outline his private plan for world domination.

    Had Himmler done the same, Hitler would have had his hands cut off.

    My suggestion for Odierno is to demote him to private, send him to Alaska and have him guard a section of pipeline with a wooden rifle and a pair of electric socks. We can hope he doesn’t get a splinter or electricuted….or should we?

    Even then I would keep a UAV overhead to make sure he didn’t manage to hurt himself.

    Army “Nutter” Ray Odierno Goes “Full Stalin” at CFR | Veterans Today






    Please Suggest an Appropriate Caption
    , How about numnuts!!!!!!
    Last edited by kathyet; 06-08-2012 at 03:20 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    U.S. Army Chief Of Staff And CFR Member Calls For Martial Law

    Monday, 11 June 2012 04:31 Joe Wolverton




    This article was written by Joe Wolverton and originally published at The New American
    The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) proposes that the U.S. Army be used to plan, command, and carry out (with the help of civilian law enforcement) domestic police missions. So says a story appearing in the May/June issue of the influential organization’s official journal, Foreign Affairs. The article lacks a single reference to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits such actions.
    In an article penned by Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Raymond T. Odierno, the CFR would see the Army used to address “challenges in the United States itself” in order to keep the homeland safe from domestic disasters, including terrorist attacks. Odierno writes:
    Where appropriate we will also dedicate active-duty forces, especially those with niche skills and equipment, to provide civilian officials with a robust set of reliable and rapid response options.
    That’s right. Should the sheriff suspect that a particular citizen in his county poses a threat to security and feels he doesn’t have the proper “skills and equipment” to deal with the situation, he can just call out the U.S. Army and bring a “rapid response” force that is robust enough to eliminate the problem.


    These are not the musings of an unknown academic written in an obscure journal of little importance. These are the black-and-white plans for “building a flexible force” as laid out by the man in charge and published for all the world to read by the people who may have put him there.
    In order to justify this new (and illegal) mission for the Army, General Odierno points to three “major changes” that have precipitated the re-tasking of the troops: First, “declining budgets due to the country’s worsened fiscal situation; second, “a shift in emphasis to the Asia-Pacific region; and third, a “broadening of focus from counterinsurgency, counterterrorism, and training of partners to shaping the strategic environment, preventing the outbreak of dangerous regional conflicts, and improving the army’s readiness to respond in force to a range of complex contingencies worldwide.”
    There are so many things wrong with every one of these points that each deserves its own article focused solely on its deconstruction. Unfortunately, there is only so much space and each of these considerations has one critical flaw in common: no constitutional authority for any of it.
    Start with the woeful economic state of American affairs. Odierno lists this first among his unholy trinity of reasons the army must “transition” from its traditional role to one with a wider domestic and international scope.
    Perhaps it has escaped General Odierno’s attention, but the decline of America’s economic fortunes may be in some significant part tied to the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that siphon about $13 billion per month from the U.S. Treasury. Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, estimates are that Congress has approved a total of $1.283 trillion in military operations, base security, reconstruction, foreign aid, embassy costs, and veterans’ health care spread over three operations: Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Afghanistan and other counter terror operations; Operation Noble Eagle (ONE), providing enhanced security at military bases; and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).
    There is a certain macabre irony to the claim by a military leader that his troops are forced to adapt to stringent budget considerations partially brought about by the use of his troops as the tip of America’s sword of empire.
    General Odierno’s third “major change” is the need to use the Army to solve complex international conflicts. Again, these conflicts and the solutions to them are made more complex by the fact that there is not a single syllable in the Constitution that grants the President or Congress the authority to deploy American armed forces to work out the world’s difficult dilemmas.
    On this point, regarding the rules to govern the creation and governing of a federal army, the Constitution says very little. In Article I, Section 8, Congress is authorized to “raise and support Armies” and to “make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.” That’s it. That paucity of information has been magnified by the Council on Foreign Relations and their members in positions of power to include the use of the Army in ways and means that would seem unimaginable even to the most martial of our Founding Fathers.
    One of the unconstitutional missions advocated by Odierno and the CFR is the use of the U.S. Army as “a critical guarantor of stability in the Asia-Pacific region.” This is one of the many new “assigned missions” promoted by Odierno in his Foreign Affairs article.
    This echoes the pronouncement by his Commander-in-Chief made in Australia last November:
    This is the future we seek for the Asia-Pacific — security, prosperity and dignity for all. That’s what we stand for. That’s who we are. That’s the future we will pursue in partnership with allies and friends and with every element of American power.
    That is to say, General Odierno and President Obama believe that deterring aggression against our allies in Asia and the Pacific trumps any constitutional stricture on the appropriate use of the Army. There is nothing it seems that will stand in the way of our Army being placed at the disposal of foreign princes and presidents, provided they appreciate their resulting status as satraps of the American Emperor.
    Not to worry; other provinces of the emerging American empire are accounted for in the Odierno/CFR plan.
    “The posture of the U.S. military in the Middle East is critical to maintaining regional stability there,” writes Odierno, again without any noticeable sense of irony.
    Is the general privy to some reports of stability in the Middle East kept secret from the rest of us? There is no end to the media’s reminders of the instability in the Middle East. In fact, it is this very unsettled foundation upon which the need for ongoing American military presence there is built.
    In other words, the Middle East is stable because of the Army, the Middle East will remain stable only so long as the Army remains on permanent patrol, and if we were to completely abandon our posts, the region would devolve into outright — instability. Thus is the quality of the reasoning demonstrated by those with command and control of the armed forces of the United States.
    One of the timeliest tenets of the Odierno/CFR proposal is the integration of “cyberspace capabilities into our tactical and operational units.” According to an article published last Friday in the New York Times:
    From his first months in office, President Obama secretly ordered increasingly sophisticated attacks on the computer systems that run Iran’s main nuclear enrichment facilities, significantly expanding America’s first sustained use of cyberweapons, according to participants in the program.
    For the CFR it seems the message from the Obama administration is ask and ye shall receive.
    Lest there remain any doubt as to America’s resolve, Odierno wants our nation’s enemies (foreign and domestic) to understand that we are not afraid to “compel capitulation.” Should those “potential adversaries” be American, moreover, Odierno promises that the Army will “be ready to decisively achieve American ends, whatever they may be.”
    Finally, we will, Odierno declares, demonstrate “our country’s commitment to global security.”
    Sadly, Americans know this too well, as there are rows and rows of white headstones and flag-draped coffins already demonstrating the seriousness of that commitment.

    U.S. Army Chief Of Staff And CFR Member Calls For Martial Law
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Just a Matter of Time before our children get the NWO fun filled excitement here

    If the CFR is at War With America... Just Come Out And Say It So We Can Get Your A@@ Locked Up Behind Bars Where You Are unable To Do ANY More Damage to America and the World Than You Have Already Done

    Freaks like this will have Drones raining down on America

    This NUT needs to be relieved from command; reduced in rank to the lowest field grade officer job available; released from active duty with a LOSS of all retirement pay and benefits

    Last edited by AirborneSapper7; 06-12-2012 at 09:40 PM.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696


    looks like the same heavy set version of Joseph Goebbels ... with a shaved head of course



    Reich propaganda minister Goebbels

    He has the same Nutty features of Hermann Göring prior to ther Nuremburg War Crimes Trials



    Well....... he also has the Psycho mentality of Rudolf Hess ... with a twist

    Last edited by AirborneSapper7; 06-18-2012 at 04:41 AM.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Obama globalist explained - The U N Deception



    The CFR is explained well

    you are in a lot of shit America

    The U.N. + U.S. Globalists Politicians says they are the Borg and You Will Be Assimulated.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Domestic Deployment: U.S. Army Chief Says Military Will Be Used To Provide “Rapid Response Options” and Address “Challenges in the United States Itself”

    Mac Slavo
    June 14th, 2012
    SHTFplan.com
    Comments (192)
    Read by 12,679 people


    As the Department of Homeland Security and local law enforcement fuse into a single militarized policing apparatus for the whole of America through the use of massive surveillance warehouses, eye-in-the-sky drones and hybrid task forces, the U.S. military will continue to expand it’s role in domestic affairs, including in the event of natural disasters and terror related crises. So says Army Chief of Staff Raymond Odierno, who recently penned an article in Foreign Affairs, a propaganda mouthpiece published by the Council of Foreign Relations, an organization well known for having its hand in the economic, financial, social, military and political policies of every developed nation on Earth.

    The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) proposes that the U.S. Army be used to plan, command, and carry out (with the help of civilian law enforcement) domestic police missions…

    …the CFR would see the Army used to address “challenges in the United States itself” in order to keep the homeland safe from domestic disasters, including terrorist attacks.

    Odierno writes:
    Where appropriate we will also dedicate active-duty forces, especially those with niche skills and equipment, to provide civilian officials with a robust set of reliable and rapid response options.
    That’s right. Should the sheriff suspect that a particular citizen in his county poses a threat to security and feels he doesn’t have the proper “skills and equipment” to deal with the situation, he can just call out the U.S. Army and bring a “rapid response” force that is robust enough to eliminate the problem.

    These are not the musings of an unknown academic written in an obscure journal of little importance. These are the black-and-white plans for “building a flexible force” as laid out by the man in charge and published for all the world to read by the people who may have put him there.

    In order to justify this new (and illegal) mission for the Army, General Odierno points to three “major changes” that have precipitated the re-tasking of the troops: First, “declining budgets due to the country’s worsened fiscal situation; second, “a shift in emphasis to the Asia-Pacific region; and third, a “broadening of focus from counterinsurgency, counter-terrorism, and training of partners to shaping the strategic environment, preventing the outbreak of dangerous regional conflicts, and improving the army’s readiness to respond in force to a range of complex contingencies worldwide.”

    Source: New American via Federal Jack
    The head of the U.S. military, in a publication for an organization that is hell bent on centralizing the activities of sovereign nations into a single global entity, has outlined the intentions of our government, military, and international community for future deployment in what’s shaping up to be America’s next theater of operations – the domestic front.

    With the passage of recent legislation that allows for the detention of American citizens without charge or trial, a stifling of freedom to protest at events of “national significance”, the expansion of terror definitions, and a new executive order that authorizes martial law and military deployment at any time the President deems necessary, it should be obvious that it is only a matter of time before tanks and soldiers are deployed on the streets of America.

    Domestic Deployment: U.S. Army Chief Says Military Will Be Used To Provide "Rapid Response Options" and Address "Challenges in the United States Itself"
    Last edited by AirborneSapper7; 06-16-2012 at 11:44 PM.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Memorable quotes for Tropic Thunder

    Kirk Lazarus: Everybody knows you never go full retard.

    Tugg Speedman: What do you mean?

    Kirk Lazarus: Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, 'Rain Man,' look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Counted toothpicks, cheated cards. Autistic, sho'. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, 'Forrest Gump.' Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded. Peter Sellers, "Being There." Infantile, yes. Retarded, no.

    You went full retard, man.

    Never go full retard.

    You don't buy that? Ask Sean Penn, 2001, "I Am Sam." Remember? Went full retard, went home empty handed...

    Tropic Thunder (200 - Memorable quotes


    Tropic Thunder : Film Clip - Nobody Goes Full Retard


    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696


    NEVER GO FULL RETARD

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #9
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    U.S. Army Chief Of Staff And CFR Member Calls For Martial Law



    Never Go Full Retard
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696



    This NUT needs to be relieved from command; reduced in rank to the lowest field grade officer job available; released from active duty with a LOSS of all retirement pay and benefits


    Well OK... If your NOT going to fire him ... you better start reading the History books on WW II

    or... I would recommend getting rid of your gold and silver fillings A.S.A.P.

    Last edited by AirborneSapper7; 06-18-2012 at 04:38 AM.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •