Thread: A World Government Constitution Under The UN Already Exists – The US Is Involved Up T

A World Government Constitution Under The UN Already Exists – The US Is Involved Up To Our Eyeballs

Rick Wells
05/28/2015


Dr Ileana Johnson Paugh is the author of an extremely informative book entitled U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy. As one who grew up under authoritarianism in Communist Romania, Dr Paugh is knows what to watch out for and she is quite concerned about UN Agenda 21 and the path towards a global Marxist government we are all being led down.

In the seventh chapter of her book, entitled “Diced is UN’s Environmental Constitution for the World,” Dr Paugh notes that the mechanics for world government have progressed to the point of the publishing of the fourth draft of a global constitution. It’s known as the Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development, (DICED), the most recent revision which was submitted to the United Nations, on September 22nd, 2010. The authors describe it as being “written to control all development tied to the environment, the highest form of law for all human activity.”

Most members of religious organizations around the globe would probably take exception to the UN’s overly grandiose description of their manipulative product but they’re just getting started. There is much more objectionable where that came from.

DICED contains 79 articles covering 242 pages, which take the principles of UN Agenda 21 and place them into a legal central planning document representing “global law.” It is intended to supersede all constitutions of all nations, including that of the United States. The source of this pornographic assault on liberty was both the International Council on Environmental Law (ICEL) in Bonn, Germany as well as the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (ICUN), with offices in Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

The IUCN has some interesting members, some that most Americans would be very surprised to learn of and suspicious of legitimacy of their involvement, given the stated intent of overthrowing and replacing the United States government. Members include the global warming globalist Nazis at the State Department as well as the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Agriculture (Forest Service), Interior (Fish and Wildlife, National Park Service), and the ever-present and all-controlling EPA.

Dr. Paugh points out that the writers describe DICED as a “living document,” one intended to be modified as methods of greater control and exploitation become available to them. They call it a blueprint that will be adopted by all members of the United Nations in order to achieve the socialist utopia founded upon Sustainable Development, focusing on “social and economic pillars.” They profess a need of “leveling the playing field for international trade and having a common basis of future lawmaking. None of this is good for the future of the United States.

Some of the more disturbing and potentially abused articles contained in the DICED are:

Article 2 – respect for all life forms, – which would be implemented in keeping with the UN theories that men are not superior in rank to other creatures, and as equals we must make concessions in the areas of territory, resource utilization, food type and its levels of consumption.

Article 3 – proposes that the entire globe should be under “the protection of international law.”

Article 5 – refers to “equity and justice,” code words for socialism and communism.

Article – 16 requires all member nations to adopt environmental conservation into all national decisions, which would then necessarily have to be enforced by an authority greater than an individual nation, the UN.

Article 20 – requires all nations to “mitigate the adverse effects of climate change,” as imaginary and contrived as they are.

Article 31 – calls for “Action to Eradicate Poverty,” through wealth redistribution from developed nations to less developed ones.

Article 33 – deals with what it describes as “Demographic policies,” what the rest of us would see as population caps and controls, requiring countries to calculate “the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting and to implement measures that prevent the population from exceeding that level.”

Article 34 – calls for an open and non-discriminatory trading system in which “prices of commodities and raw materials reflect the full direct and indirect social and environmental costs of their extraction, production, transport, marketing and where appropriate, ultimate disposal. The free market does that without regulations very effectively, but control freaks have to remind us who’s in charge.

Article 41- requires integrated planning systems, irrespective of administrative boundaries within a country, and is based on Paragraph 10.5 of Agenda 21, which seeks to “facilitate allocation of land to the uses that provide the greatest sustainable benefits and to promote the transition to a sustainable and integrated management of land resources.” The procedure for those assessments was developed by the controlling elites at the World Bank and is outlined in part below:

The mandate that “Aquifers, drainage basins, coastal, marine areas, and any areas called ecological units must be taken into account when allocating land for municipal, agricultural, grazing, forestry, and other uses. Agricultural subsidies are discouraged, as well as subsidizing private enterprises.

They also dictate that “Physical planning must follow an integrated approach to land use – infrastructure, highways, railways, waterways, dams, and harbors. Town and country planning must include land use plans elaborated at all levels of government.”
Articles 51 tells us that we will be forced to pay for the privilege of existing under this new tyranny, with Article 52 detailing the original, but surely not the ultimate price of .07 of GDP by every nation on the planet to our new masters in the UN.

Article 69 – establishes a judicial system superior to that of formerly independent nations for the international settlement of disputes.

Article 71 – sets up an amendment process through the United Nations.

In closing out the chapter, Paugh notes, “Because this Draft Covenant has a Preamble and 79 articles, it is obviously intended to be a “world constitution for global governance,” an onerous way to control population growth, redistribute wealth, force social and “economic equity and justice,” economic control, consumption control, land and water use control and re-settlement control as a form of social engineering.

The United Nations, their comrades within our government, and the elites of this world represent a very real and present danger to American sovereignty. Another step down this road to tyranny is planned for the end of this year as the UN meets in Paris to force us into accepting UN climate change mandates, the associated submission to UN authority and payment of their “humanitarian” extortion. Hussein Obama, and John Kerry will host the globalist operative Pope Francis in New York in September in the lead up to the December gathering of the climate cabal in France. Their international power grab under the guise fighting the air and oceans is upon us. This attack has been planned for a long time; the safety is off and their corrupt, profiteering finger is resting on the trigger.
This threat must not be ignored but it will surely not be adequately addressed by the largely cowardly non-representatives occupying Congress unless we demand it, which is exactly what needs to happen. We need to light up the phones and seriously reconsider our voting patterns and our choice of candidates or party. What we are doing now is not working. They’re getting fat and lazy, and to a degree, so have we. America is going down as a result. We’re circling the drain; the time for action is now.

Source – U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy


Read more at http://universalfreepress.com/a-worl...-our-eyeballs/

Agenda 21

Agenda 21 explains that population, consumption and technology are the primary driving forces of environmental change. It lays out what needs to be done to reduce wasteful and inefficient consumption patterns in some parts of the world while encouraging increased but sustainable development in others. It offers policies and programmes to achieve a sustainable balance between consumption, population and the Earth’s life-supporting capacity. It describes some of technologies and techniques that need to be developed to provide for human needs while carefully managing natural resources.

Agenda 21 provides options for combating degradation of the land, air and water, conserving forests and the diversity of species of life. It deals with poverty and excessive consumption, health and education, cities and farmers. There are roles for everyone: governments, business people, trade unions, scientists, teachers, indigenous people, women, youth and children. Agenda 21 does not shun business. It says that sustainable development is the way to reverse both poverty and environmental destruction.

We currently gauge the success of economic development mainly by the amount of money it produces. Accounting systems that measure the wealth of nations also need to count the full value of natural resources and the full cost of environmental degradation. The polluter should, in principle, bear the costs of pollution. To reduce the risk of causing damage, environmental assessment should be carried out before starting projects that carry the risk of adverse impacts. Governments should reduce or eliminate subsidies that are not consistent with sustainable development.

A major theme of Agenda 21 is the need to eradicate poverty by giving poor people more access to the resources they need to live sustainably. By adopting Agenda 21, industrialized countries recognized that they have a greater role in cleaning up the environment than poor nations, who produce relatively less pollution. The richer nations also promised more funding to help other nations develop in ways that have lower environmental impacts. Beyond funding, nations need help in building the expertise— the capacity— to plan and carry out sustainable development decisions. This will require the transfer of information and skills.

Agenda 21 calls on governments to adopt national strategies for sustainable development. These should be developed with wide participation, including non-government organizations and the public. Agenda 21 puts most of the responsibility for leading change on national governments, but says they need to work in a broad series of partnerships with international organizations, business, regional, state, provincial and local governments, non-governmental and citizens’ groups.

As Agenda 21 says, only a global partnership will ensure that all nations will have a safer and more prosperous future.


Chapter 1:PreambleSection One: Social and Economic DimensionsChapter
2: International CooperationChapter
3: Combating PovertyChapter
4: Changing Consumption PatternsChapter
5: Population and Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
6: Protecting and Promoting Human HealthChapter
7: Sustainable Human SettlementsChapter
8: Making Decisions for Sustainable DevelopmentSection Two: Conservation and Management of ResourcesChapter
9: Protecting the AtmosphereChapter
10: Managing Land SustainablyChapter
11: Combating DeforestationChapter
12: Combating Desertification and DroughtChapter
13: Sustainable Mountain DevelopmentChapter
14: Sustainable Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentChapter
15: Conservation of Biological DiversityChapter
16: Environmentally Sound Management of BiotechnologyChapter
17: Protecting and Managing the OceansChapter
18: Protecting and Managing Fresh WaterChapter
19: Safer Use of Toxic ChemicalsChapter
20: Managing Hazardous WastesChapter
21: Managing Solid Wastes and SewageChapter
22: Managing Radioactive WastesSection Three: Strengthening the Role of Major GroupsChapter
23: Preamble to Strengthening the Role of Major GroupsChapter
24: Women in Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
25: Children and Youth in Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
26: Strengthening the Role of Indigenous PeopleChapter
27: Partnerships with NGOsChapter
28: Local AuthoritiesChapter
29: Workers and Trade UnionsChapter
30: Business and IndustryChapter
31: Scientists and TechnologistsSection Four: Means of ImplementationChapter
32: Strengthening the Role of FarmersChapter
33: Financing Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
34: Technology TransferChapter
35: Science for Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
36: Education, Training and Public AwarenessChapter
37: Creating the Capacity for Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
38: Organizing for Sustainable DevelopmentChapter
39: International LawChapter 40: Information for Decision-Making

https://www.iisd.org/rio+5/agenda/agenda21.htm

Read Also

MIGRATION AND THEUNITED NATIONSPOST-2015DEVELOPMENTAGENDA
http://publications.iom.int/bookstor...015_Agenda.pdf

Also:

RIO 2012 Issues Briefswww.uncsd2012.org
Produced by the UNCSD Secretariat
June 2012No. 15
Migration and sustainable development
http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/443Migration%20Issues%20Brief_final_June%208.pdf