Thread: Breaking:Nelson will vote for cloture, some fed. $$$

His state will be exempt for life of federal Medicaid subsidies.

That is the deal he made.

Well, doesn't that make this whole thing illegal and unconstitutional?

Equal to all states????

How many people are actually informed about what is taking place? Not many! And that is what the depots who have seized control of our government are counting on. If more people actually understood those in control in Washington are blatantly violating our Constitution, plundering our national treasury and causing our nation’s misery in the process, they would be more inclined to rise up and do what is necessary to take back the helm of their government and immediately charge these tyrants with the crimes they are committing.


When a member of Congress, after taking the mandatory oath of office violates that oath, perjury has indeed been committed. Keep in mind when criminal trials are conducted, those who testify in court are required to take an oath that what they testify to shall be the truth. The oath is necessary to later create a legal path to charge one with perjury if they do not tell the truth. The oath creates the legal path to punish those who knowingly and willingly lie.

The same logic must apply to members of Congress who are required to take an oath of office:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution

The oath of office would seem to be key in charging a member of Congress with perjury when he/she fails to be obedient to that oath by voting for bills which blatantly violate our Constitution.
I believe most of these scoundrel’s voting records provides sufficient documented occasions to establish they have repeatedly engaged in perjury, at least enough times to obtain an indictment. However, convincing a jury that perjury has been committed by a specific member of Congress would be a different matter. But I suspect if a Congressman’s voting record is presented to a jury along with the documented intentions and beliefs under which our Constitution was adopted, and the countless times it has been violated by the Congressman in question, that Congressman would have an impossible task in defending against perjury or establishing their voting record is in harmony with our Constitution, and thus, the charge of perjury would become more obvious and credible as each recorded vote is put along side our written Constitution.

All that is needed to change the attitude in Washington is to get one honorable State’s Attorney General to present the question to a Grand Jury and charge one of these despots with misfeasance and malfeasance along with perjury.

Bottom line is, Congress has not been granted power to tax for, spend on, regulate and legislate into law the available health care choices the people may make as proposed under the Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009! We have a federal government acting in rebellion to our written Constitution and the documented intentions and beliefs under which it was adopted! When will the people wake up and defend THEIR Constitution?


JWK

“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted, it means now. “___ South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 (1905)