Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By Airbornesapper07
  • 1 Post By johnwk

Thread: BREAKING! PA Judge Rules Election UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Effectively Gives State to TRUMP!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    22,506

    BREAKING! PA Judge Rules Election UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Effectively Gives State to TRUMP!



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMQ9a2mlsRw

    BREAKING! PA Judge Rules Election UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Effectively Gives State to TRUMP!!!


    A PA judge has basically handed the state to Trump! That’s what we’re going to talk about in this special livestream; a PA judge has basically handed the state to Trump! This may indeed be the first domino to fall here; if PA falls to Trump, every single contested state will fall in line as well, that includes AZ and NV! This is absolutely HUGE!



    Beezer and Judy like this.
    If you're gonna fight, fight like you're the third monkey on the ramp to Noah's Ark... and brother its starting to rain. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,916

    PA's Supreme Court engaged in Judicial Tyranny, allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots

    Unfortunately, the Case which is discussed in the Video, Kelly v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania, Judge PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH's, memorandum opinion, was dealt a death blow by Pennsylvania's Supreme Court in the following ORDER

    .


    The PA Supreme Court never addressed the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in ballots which in fact violates Pennsylvania’s Constitution, namely Article VII, §§ 1 and 4


    What the Court did was use the doctrine of laches [falsely asserting the dispute was not raised in a timely fashion] to allow unauthorized ballots to be counted, while ignoring their illegality, since the Constitution was never amended to allow such ballots, and, which in effect, cancelled out legally cast ballots, thereby disentrancing millions of voters.


    In effect, the court assumed legislative and executive functions and engaged in judicial tyranny!


    JWK

    ”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47
    Last edited by johnwk; 11-30-2020 at 11:56 AM.
    Judy likes this.

Similar Threads

  1. Orange County judge rules California's 'sanctuary state' law unconstitutional
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-29-2018, 12:30 PM
  2. Judge rules federal anti-sanctuary city law unconstitutional Trump
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-07-2018, 01:52 PM
  3. Breaking News: Federal Judge Rules Obama Amnesty Unconstitutional
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration Announcements
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-16-2014, 10:00 PM
  4. Utah’s same-sex marriage ban is unconstitutional, judge rules
    By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-21-2013, 01:45 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •