Thread: British Islamist Abu Waleed: Muslims should humiliate Christians so they’ll Convert t

British Islamist Abu Waleed: Muslims should humiliate Christians so they’ll Convert to Islam

Watch this. This popular Muslim leader speaks with ease and absolute assurance of the supremacism of Muslims and how they must degrade and humiliate the non-Muslim. And the Brits are banning Spencer and me? Societal suicidal.

video at link below

“British Islamist Abu Waleed: Muslims Should Humiliate Christians in Order to Make Them Convert to Islam,” MEMRI (thanks to Robert Spencer)

In a lecture posted on the Internet on January 16, 2014, British Islamist Abu Waleed called to impose humiliating laws on the Christians in order to make them want to convert to Islam. The infidel should have to wear a red belt around his neck in the street and wear two different shoes, among other things, he said. That way, everyone will want to become Muslim, explained Abu Waleed.

Following are excerpts:
Abu Waleed: How many contradictions do the Charter of the United Nations and Islam have?
[…]
We take what Abdullah Ibn Abbas said, because he was a Companion, from the greatest commentators on the Koran. He said to take the jizya poll tax from the People of the Book. This completely contradicts, my dear brothers, the articles of the United Nations [Charter].
Article 2, paragraph 1, says that the organization is based on the principle of sovereignty and equality to all of its members. Equality to all of its members – is there such a thing in Islam? Is there equality of faith?

If we look at one hadith of the Prophet on the authority of Abu Huraira, Sahih Muslim… No Sunni Muslim could really argue against Sahih Muslim or Sahih Bukhari… “The Prophet said: Don’t greet the Jews and the Christians before they greet you, and when you meet any of them on the road, force them to go on the narrower side of it.” Imam Malik said the same thing as well.

In fact, Omar Ibn Al-Khattab – about whom the Prophet Muhammad said: “If there were to be another prophet after me, it would be Omar Ibn Al-Khattab”… In his own charter – not the Charter of the United Nations – in his charter with the people of the Levant, the Christians of the Levant, [it is stated] that infidels and Muslims were not allowed to wear the same clothes as one another.

If a Muslim comes out on the day of ‘Eid and sees an infidel with nice clothes, the infidel has to take his clothes off and give them to the Muslim. When an infidel walks down the street, he has to wear a red belt around his neck, he has to have his forehead shaved, and he has to wear two shoes that are different from one another. He is not allowed to walk on the pavement. He has to walk in the middle of the road, and he has to ride on a mule.
This is only for adults, not for the children. You can see how Islam would make the child become a Muslim. The child growing up in a state of heresy would turn to Islam. Why? Because the child would be walking along with his dad, and would say: “Dad?” “Yes.” “Why have you got your forehead shaved?” “I don’t know, these Muslims make me do it.” “Why can’t you ride the animal like the Muslims, who ride like this? Why are you riding with both legs dangling on the side of the donkey?” “Why is it that every time a Muslim comes and asks you for your clothes, you give them?” “Why is it that every time he tells you to get down from the horse, you have to take it?”

No only that, but [Omar Ibn Al-Khattab] said that the infidels can have their churches, but they are not allowed to ring the bell. If a Muslim is walking by… let’s say, for example that a Muslim has been on Edgware Road. He has had some nice shisha, some nice steak… No hubble-bubble – we don’t deal with anything like that. He’s walking along, rubbing his belly, and he’s like: “Oh man, I don’t want to upset my wife tonight.” What can he do? He can go to the church, knock on the door, and say: “John, let me in.” “Okay, no problem.” John has to put up Abd Al-Ghafour for the night. Abd Al-Ghafour, with his big belly, having his nice kebab – John has to open up the church, and [allow him] to go and sleep there, nice and comfortable, and [he will] say: “John, thank you,” and carry on going, early in the morning.

What wife is going to live with John under that type of circumstances? [She would say]: “What kind of dishonor is it for me to live with John, and Abd Al-Ghafour comes every Friday night and sleeps in our be as well?” Of course… Because Sunna is to look after the guest, right? I can’t make you sleep on my floor… and you are a Muslim by the way…. So what about when Abd Al-Ghafour goes to John’s house? [He will say]: “John, sleep on the floor, and I’ll sleep in the bed.”

What’s going to happen? Tracy is going to be on the floor, thinking: “My husband has got his forehead shaved, and look at this one… He’s like Al-Khattab…” Which one is more attractive – we’re not gay, but I’m just saying… – a man with his forehead shaved, one belt around his neck, and two different colored shoes, or Emir Al-Khattab? Emir Al-Khattab, who we’re talking about here now, with that nice Chechen hat, a big beard – a bit to the side… He’s got the badges there: “There is no god but Allah.” He’s got a big gun. He’s got a big camouflage jacket on, nice boots, and gloves as well. Even if he’s got a couple of fingers missing, he still looks attractive.

What is Tracy going to do? John is in for a problem. He just let the Emir in for a kebab, and he lost his own wife as well. So everyone is going to become Muslims. That, my dear brothers, is the Islamic state….

Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/br...QkMWUSH1Fd5.99

If this is how they think they have a big problem!!!

Darrell Issa Shows Ignorance of Islam in Public Spat over Sharia - Freedom Outpost
freedomoutpost.com




Darrell Issa Shows Ignorance of Islam in Public Spat over Sharia

Pamela Geller 14 mins ago

California State Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, who is running for governor, recently pointed out that his rival Neel Kashkari "supported the United States submitting to the Islamic, Sharia banking code in 2008 when he ran TARP."
The charge was true, but that didn't stop the influential Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chair, from furiously denouncing not Kashkari, but Donnelly – illustrating again what's wrong with the right.

Issa raged: "There is no place in any public discussion for this type of hateful and ignorant garbage. As far as I'm concerned, this type of stupidity disqualifies Donnelly from being fit to hold any office, anywhere. Donnelly is no longer a viable option for California voters… There is no place in the Republican Party or in this race for someone like Tim Donnelly."
Donnelly duly apologized. But he shouldn't have. He was right. Did Darryll Issa even look into the charge? Or did he knee-jerk smear Donnelly? And who died and made Issa king of the Republican Party? Who is this uninformed loudmouth to say who is or isn't welcomed into the Republican Party? Like Brody said in Jaws, we need a bigger boat. If every time someone touches the third rail – jihad and sharia – they get burned and turned on, then the Republicans are going the way of the Whigs.
It's Issa who should be taken to the woodshed, not Donnelly. What was hateful wasn't Donnelly's statement but Issa's response. What is ignorant is Issa's complete lack of knowledge of sharia, TARP, and the taxpayer-funded sharia programs. Why should the American taxpayer legitimize and institutionalize the Sharia? Sharia finance is the pernicious effort to force the banking industry to conform to Islamic law. Sharia banking finances Islamic terror through zakat (Islamic almsgiving) and would destroy whole sectors of the American economy, as it prohibits investment in whole industries, including pork, alcohol, tobacco, and some forms of entertainment.
Sharia Finance Watch explains that sharia-compliant finance "as monitored by paid Sharia law advisors to U.S. banking institutions must 'purify' certain return on investment (ROI) dollars that do not meet Sharia law standards. This money must be donated to Islamic charities – including some that promote Jihad and support suicide bombing. Investment disclosures state that these profits can be as high as 6% of profits of investments."
That's what Kashkari was selling when he spoke at a Treasury Department conference in 2008 that was intended to "inform the policy community about Islamic financial services, which are an increasingly important part of the global financial industry." The conference's stated purpose was to "provide government policymakers information about Islamic finance. The presentation materials from the conference discussed topics such as the source of Islamic finance, how Islamic finance works, and the market factors that caused its growth."
The introduction of sharia finance in the U.S. has support at the highest levels. A recent lawsuit brought to light the fact that $153 million in taxpayer money has been spent on sharia-compliant finance. David Yerushalmi of the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC), who represented the anti-sharia plaintiff in that lawsuit, told me:

I take no position about what kind of governor Mr. Kashkari would make or indeed what kind of conservative bona fides he has in his brief. What I can say is that the U.S. Treasury under President Bush, during Mr. Kashkari's deep involvement in TARP, actively promoted Sharia-compliant finance when it knew very well that this vehicle was being used not only to promote jihad, but also to effectively defraud Western investors by failing to disclose the Black Box that is Sharia. Mr. Kashkari might claim he was simply naive about the insidious and invidious nature of Sharia. That naiveté, though, becomes part of his resume for governor. But one thing I can say with absolute certainty: the Treasury Department he served knew exactly what it was doing. We uncovered documents during discovery where we learned that the Treasury was not merely promoting Sharia-compliant finance through its acquisition of AIG, but that it had been promoting Sharia as an international financing model leading up to the government's takeover of AIG.

Confirming that is a statement from Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Robert Kimmitt, who said around the same time that this conference was held that "the U.S. government is currently studying the salient features of Islamic banking to ascertain how far it could be useful in fighting the ongoing world economic crisis."
Nevertheless, Kashkari downplayed his involvement in the conference: "They were looking for a senior Treasury official to give the opening remarks at this conference, and I happened to be scheduled to be in the office that day." He did acknowledge, however, that "these sorts of conferences were put on to help promote an understanding of how you can still have free market principles and open economics even in Islamic countries." Really? Where? In which Islamic countries? His claim is false on its face.

Issa's savage attack on Donnelly is yet another indication of how naïve and complacent establishment Republicans are about the threat of jihad and Islamic supremacism. Issa said this on Bill Maher's show back in 2007:

One of the problems that we have as Americans in my opinion having traveled the region a little bit, is that we try to say Muslims as though it was one place. If you go to the Palestinian territories the one thing you'll see is that for over 1000 years, Christians and Muslims have lived side-by-side... So we can talk about radical Islam, but we see no evidence out of it there. You go to Ethiopia, [where] you have some of the oldest Christians in the world and Muslims. They have a lot of problems in Ethiopia, we'll endless[ly talk] about the problems in Ethiopia, except they look down on Somalia for their problems, but there is no question that religious tolerance of the two living side by side has not been about extremism, 'convert or you'll die.'

"No evidence" of "radical Islam" in the Palestinian territories? What is he smoking? There are churches in those areas because under Muslim rule the Christians were subjugated dhimmis, denied basic rights and paying jizya (poll tax) to the Islamic state. The Muslims let them live because they constituted their source of revenue for the state. That's tolerance?
Clearly Darrell Issa knows nothing about Islam, sharia, or Islamic history.
In 2011, Issa co-sponsored the Hezbollah Anti-Terrorism Act (HATA), a bill to cut aid to the Hezbollah-led Lebanese government. However, he has also denounced "Israel's wanton violation of Lebanese territory and its somewhat failed attempt to defeat Hezbollah." He has even said, "You can't end an idea or a terrorist organization by guns alone." So does Issa suggest we roast marshmallows with Boko Haram? Al-Shabaab? Hamas?
Darrell Issa is the latest illustration of what's wrong with the Republican Party and of our increasingly serious need for a genuine opposition party in Washington.
Source
Pamela Geller's commitment to freedom from jihad and Sharia shines forth in her books.
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/da...xsbPyy2zBcq.99

WESTERN LIBERAL WOMEN: PAY ATTENTION..PLEASE!

Muslim girls being lead off in chains to meet their new husbands. The leading experts in Islamic Law met recently at the 191st meeting of the Council of Islamic Ideology and declared as un-Islamic any laws attempting to establish a minimum age for girls to be married.

At the 192nd meeting the Council of Islamic Ideology went further and declared that women are un-Islamic and that their mere existence contradicted Sharia and the will of Allah. "Women by existing defied the laws of nature, and to protect Islam and the Sharia women should be forced to stop existing as soon as possible." Women who express their own will (most especially non-Muslim women) will be the first targeted for extermination.

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2014...e-anti-islamic

PLEASE SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE!
Britain First



Council of Islamic Ideology declares women’s existence anti-Islamic

March 15, 2014 BY Khabaristan Today

Islamabad - Sharia Correspondent: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting on Thursday with the ruling that women are un-Islamic and that their mere existence contradicted Sharia and the will of Allah. As the meeting concluded CII Chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani noted that women by existing defied the laws of nature, and to protect Islam and the Sharia women should be forced to stop existing as soon as possible. The announcement comes a couple of days after CII’s 191^st meeting where they dubbed laws related to minimum marriage age to be un-Islamic.After declaring women to be un-Islamic, Shirani explained that there were actually two kinds of women – haraam and makrooh. “We can divide all women in the world into two distinct categories: those who are haraam and those who are makrooh. Now the difference between haraam and makrooh is that the former is categorically forbidden while the latter is really really disliked,” Shirani said.He further went on to explain how the women around the world can ensure that they get promoted to being makrooh, from just being downright haraam. “Any woman that exercises her will is haraam, absolutely haraam, and is conspiring against Islam and the Ummah, whereas those women who are totally subservient can reach the status of being makrooh. Such is the generosity of our ideology and such is the endeavour of Muslim men like us who are the true torchbearers of gender equality,” the CII chairman added.Officials told Khabaristan Today that the council members deliberated over various historic references related to women and concluded that each woman is a source of fitna and a perpetual enemy of Islam. They also decided that by restricting them to their subordinate, bordering on slave status, the momineen and the mujahideen can ensure that Islam continues to be the religion of peace, prosperity and gender equality.Responding to a question one of the officials said that international standards of gender equality should not be used if they contradict Islam or the constitution of Pakistan that had incorporated Islam and had given sovereignty to Allah. “We don’t believe in western ideals, and nothing that contradicts Islam should ever be paid heed. In any case by giving women the higher status of being makrooh, it’s us Muslims who have paved the way for true, Sharia compliant feminism,” the official said.The CII meeting also advised the government that to protect Islam women’s right to breathe should also be taken away from them. “Whether a woman is allowed to breathe or not be left up to her husband or male guardian, and no woman under any circumstance whatsoever should be allowed to decide whether she can breathe or not,” Shirani said.Bilawal announces Sukhbir’s concert to raise food for drought victimsThar - Staff Report: Pakistan Peoples Party (Chairman) Bilawal Benazir Zulfikar Asif Ali Zardari Bhutto (short Bilawal Bhutto) has invited renowned pop singer to Thar for a concert to raise food for the drought victims, Khabaristan Today has learnt. Bilawal believes that Sukhbir’s show, which he dubbed the Thar Festival, will generate enough money to serve the hungry people in the region.“You have no idea how much the situation in Thar is hurting me personally. The Sindh government is trying so hard to make sure that everyone in the province is happy, and yet we see such appalling pictures. I really feel like I might have to organise another Sindh Festival here,” Bilawal told Khabaristan Today.He then went on to explain how inviting Sukhbir over for a concert will solve the hunger crisis in the region. “I guess I will have to make do with a mini Thar festival, since another Sindh Festival might not be possible right now. In any case we are inviting Sukhbir over for a concert and all the money generated from the concert would go straight to the relief fund dedicated to the Thar victims,” Bilawal added.The PPP chairman further said that if concerts can make Imran Khan’s (the former cricketer, not the singer or the actor) Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf the second biggest party in the country, they can “sure as hell” make PPP the second biggest party in Sindh.“Sure, we might be calling the shots in the province but everyone knows who the biggest party in Sindh is, I mean come on,” Bilawal reiterated adding that, “Sukhbir’s party might help us establish ourselves as the second biggest provincial political party and help solve the Thar crisis simultaneously.”The PPP chairman then went on to do a bhangra dance on “Ishq Tera Tadpaay” exclusively for Khabaristan Today, forcing our camera man to resign unconditionally.529 Paul Smith outlets open in Charsadda on the same dayCharsadda - Fashion Correspondent: In what was a historic day for fashion 529 Paul Smith outlets opened simultaneously in Charsadda on Tuesday, Khabaristan Today has learnt. Another surprising fact about these outlets was that the outlets only seemed to be dealing in Paul Smith’s latest offering, “Robert”. Even so, in a surprising turn of events the original version of the shoe that is being sold for around $600 worldwide, is being sold merely for Rs600 in these outlets.We cannot seem to pinpoint the reason behind these bizarre happenings. But Paul Smith seems to have taken global and Pakistani fashion industry by storm this week. Robert seems to be here to stay, despite the fact that sales in Charsadda aren’t particularly high. Locals don’t see anything different in Robert as compared to what they have been wearing for generations.“I didn’t even notice that all these outlets had opened in this city. Probably because all they seem to be offering are these shoes that my family has been wearing for a couple of centuries now,” a passerby told this scribe.“And they are selling it at the same rate as Peshawari chappals. No wonder no one’s buying them,” he added.


Khabaristan Today

Telling it like it almost never is. Email: khabaristan.today@gmail.com.


http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2014...-anti-islamic/

Islamabad - Sharia Correspondent: The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting on Thursday with the ruling that women are un-Islamic and that their mere existence contradicted Sharia and the will of Allah.

Now how about "Lady" Michelle and her husband do something about this instead of holding a sign asking for those creeps to return their girls!!!!









These two people represent the absolute worst that this Country has to offer!!!!

Islamic Jihadist Kidnappers Boko Haram

Darwin Rockantansky 1 hour ago

I am so offended that I hardly know where to begin. One would think by now we all would be so accustomed to the hypocrisy of the Democratic community that nothing would surprise us in the least. And I do not feel that "surprise" is the appropriate word here where the outrage is to the level of inducing physical nausea.



The First Lady ✔ @FLOTUS
Follow
Our prayers are with the missing Nigerian girls and their families. It's time to #BringBackOurGirls. -mo



And just what has me so irritated? To quote a Tweet I recently saw:

"Sad-faced FLOTUS in the fancy house holding up the #BringBackOurGirls hashtag sign? Really?"

FLOTUS => First Lady of the United States. Really? I cannot keep myself from transliterating the term FLOTUS into FLOTSAM; material or refuse floating on water. Personally, I will never be able to think of this uncouth, slovenly, American hating miscreant as "First Lady" of this nation. Everything about her sickens me and shames me as an American. But I diverge.

She was joined by her Deranged-Socialist-In-Charge (DSIC) husband in an outreach to the parents of the girls recently kidnapped by Nigeria.

And the outrage begins to boil.

Where was the outreach to the parents of Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods and our ambassador Christopher Stevens when they were slaughtered in Benghazi?

The DSIC deployed U.S. resources to help hunt down the kidnappers within a matter of days in feigned hopes of recovering the girls but it took weeks to deploy resources to Benghazi. The resources deployed to Benghazi by the DSIC accomplished absolutely nothing while, at the same time, news media resources were able to locate and interview those responsible for the attack on our embassy.

And exactly who is it that took all these young girls? The group is known as Boko Haram, which is the Hausa (Afro-Asiatic Language) name for "People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teaching and Jihad." As is true with virtually all similar organizations, this organization is universally recognized as "A Terrorist Organization."

Well, "universally" is not totally accurate. "Universal" with the exception of Ms. Hillary Clinton who was this nation's Secretary of State at the time. It has been publicly reported that Ms. Clinton insisted that "The 'T-Word'" not be used in conjunction with this organization.

Ms. Clinton and Mr. Obama knowingly enabled this group to exist unopposed and to prosper under their protection in order to advance a political agenda.

And now they want to feign some level of compassion for those that their friends have attacked?

Outrageous Hypocrisy on steroids.

Sadly, I expect those girls are going to be found in one of three groups: those that were raped and murdered under Sharia Law, those that were forced into marriages with the members of Boko Haram and then raped and possibly murdered, and those that have been sold into slavery.

And when those facts come to light, the DSIC and his cohorts will feign outrage and make speeches and make whatever noise they can orchestrate in order to keep America from asking the question: Where is the compassion for those slaughtered at Benghazi?

That is the question that We The People need to keep asking until we get honest answers.
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/hy...uHPz2QJuqbD.99

Muslims Gang Rape Elderly American Woman In Colorado, In Rare And Horrific Ways

Posted on 12 May, 2014 by AmyElizabeth



About AmyElizabeth

Christian American Patriot Conservative Activist Blogger, Political Pundit 2nd Amendment Rights, Animal Lover, Fashion guru and CEO of Conservative Lady.

EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT CATHOLIC, THIS IS EYE OPENING...

When the Catholic Church was founded, there were no hospitals. Today, one out of five people in this country receive their medical care at a Catholic hospital.

When the Catholic Church was founded, there were no schools. Today, the Catholic Church teaches 3 million students a day, in its more than 250 Catholic Colleges and Universities, in its more than 1200 Catholic High Schools and its more than 5000 Catholic grade schools.

Every day, the Catholic Church feeds, clothes, shelters and educates more people than any other organization in the world.

The new Obama Health Mandate could end all this and the tax payers would have to make up the loss.

Also, all Catholic adoption services would come to an end; a human disaster.

There are more than 77 million Catholics in this country. It takes an estimated 50 million Catholic votes to elect a president. I am asking all of you to go to the polls in 2014 and be united in replacing all Senators and Reps with someone who will respect the Catholic Church, all Christians, and all Religions with the exception of Islam.

Mr. President, you said, "The USA is not a Christian Nation". You are wrong! We are a Christian Nation founded on Judeo-Christian values allowing all religions in America to Worship & Practice Freely. Something Islam will never do.

Oh, by the way, on MUSLIM HERITAGE IN America ...

Have you ever been to a Muslim hospital?

Have you heard a Muslim orchestra?

Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade?

Have you witnessed a Muslim charity?

Have you seen Muslims shaking hands with Muslim Girl Scouts?

Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper?

Have you ever seen a Muslim do anything that contributes positively to the American way of life?


DON'T KEEP THIS - SEND IT OUT TO YOUR LIST. Let’s circulate this to as many as possible.