Thread: Cancun talks reach global climate deal $100 billion transfer

Cancun talks reach global climate deal

Non-binding agreement to limit warming, $100 billion transfer to 'poor' countries --Der Spiegel

12/11/2010

Relief at Modest Progress

Cancun Talks Reach Global Climate Deal

By Markus Becker and Christoph Seidler


Greenpeace activists dressed as executives in Cancun. where a climate deal has been reached.

It is a triumph for Mexico and a step forward in the fight against global warming: the Cancun climate conference reached a compromise in a dramatic conclusion to negotiations on Saturday. The deal preserves the UN's leadership in climate talks. But the compromises reached were modest.

In the end, the Cancun climate conference exceeded all expectations. The world's governments were able to reach a compromise agreement to curb climate change and to provide poor countries with substantial funds to combat the effects of global warming.

In the dramatic final stages of the negotiations, the Bolivian delegation refused to approve the plan after all other countries, including the US and China, which had held diametrically opposing positions before the talks, had backed it.

But Mexican Foreign Minister Patricia Espinosa banged down her gavel on the deal despite the objections by Bolivia, which had complained that the draft compromise demanded too little of developed nations in cutting greenhouse gases.

"I urge you to reconsider," Bolivian delegate Pablo Solon told Espinosa. "We will get every international body necessary to make sure that the consensus is respected," said Solon. He added that the rules stated that no agreement should be passed when one country strongly objects.

Espinosa retorted coolly: "Consensus does not mean that one nation can choose to apply a veto on a process that other nations have been working on for years. I cannot ignore the opinion of another 193 states that are parties." Her response received huge applause from the floor.

The head of the US delegation, Todd Stern, backed Espinosa's decision.

$100 Billion for Poor Nations

The Mexican hosts of the talks had presented proposals for compromises on the two negotiating strands of climate diplomacy: firstly, on a continuation of the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 deal to cut greenhouse gas emissions that expires in 2012, and secondly on help to be paid by industrial nations to developing nations.

The countries most affected by global warming are to receive assistance from a "Green Climate Fund" agreed by nations in Cancun. Industrialized countries agreed to provide $30 billion by 2012, rising to $100 billion by 2020.

The Kyoto document, described by Espinosa as the "Cancun Agreement," explicitly refers to the calculations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that calls on industrialized nations to reduce their CO2 emissions by 25 to 40 percent. The text also hints at a commitment to extend the Kyoto Protocol. However, a decision on Kyoto can only be taken at the next climate conference at the end of 2011 in Durban, South Africa.

It is therefore regarded as certain that there will be a gap between the expiry of the first phase of the Kyoto Protocol at the end of 2012 and the start of the second phase, because it will take years for countries to ratify a successor treaty. It is still unclear how the gap could be bridged, and that could pose a major risk to the international trade in carbon emissions rights.

Even Optimists Were Surprised

The success of the final summit day surprised even the optimists among the delegates. The Mexican draft won support from virtually all nations, something observers had initially regarded as unlikely. Too many points of the draft presented in Cancun on Friday had seemed unacceptable to important nations such as the US or China.

But those two nations, which top the list of the world's biggest CO2 polluters, emerged as winners of the summit. If the Kyoto Protocol is extended at the Durban conference next year, China will continue to be spared from having to make binding commitments to cut its CO2 emissions. The same applies to the US, the only industrial country never to have ratified the Kyoto Protocol.

The Cancun deal also includes a commitment to limiting limit warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times -- a long-term goal that scientists have insisted is essential to avert the worst effects of climate change. But that goal isn't legally binding because nations only agreed to "take note" of it. The agreement contains no concrete targets for cuts in CO2 emissions by 2050. There are no such goals for individual industrial sectors such as farming, aviation and maritime transport either.

Campaigners Criticize Deal

Environmental groups criticized the deal in this respect. German group BUND said the agreement allowed a continuation of the climate protection efforts under the auspices of the United Nations, but made "no acceptable contribution to reducing greenhouse gases."

BUND head Hubert Weiger said: "The Cancun deal won't keep global warming below two degrees. All the lip service made by national governments won't change that. The precise shape of a Kyoto successor agreement is also completely open."

Greenpeace's Climate Coordinator Martin Kaiser also criticized the compromise. "Central questions regarding an ambitious, fair and legally binding climate protection treaty have yet again been postponed," he said. "The oil, coal and timber industries have a further year for the uncontrolled pollution of the atmosphere with carbon dioxide."

German Environment Norbert Röttgen had a far more positive take on the outcome of Cancun. "I think it's a really great success," Röttgen, who took part in the negotiations, told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "It is a significant step to revive the international climate process."

The EU should remain committed to curbing global warming, Röttgen added. He said the EU should cut its CO2 emissions by 30 percent by 2020, rather than by the 20 percent envisaged so far. Germany alone would not be able to meet that more ambitious goal, he said, adding that the other 26 nations would need to do their part.

EU Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard said she was relieved at the deal. "We can be happy that the UN process was saved," she told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "But we must not overlook how difficult the path ahead is."

http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor ... 25,00.html

90% of that money will only be stolen or syphoned off by corrupt middle men.
This is just another giant theft.

Did all of those Greenpeacers swim or sail there? Or did they commit hypocracy and fly on a carbon producing jetliner?

Todd D. Stern
Special Envoy
Special Envoy for Climate Change
Term of Appointment: 01/26/2009 to present



Todd Stern was named by Secretary Clinton as the Special Envoy for Climate Change on January 26, 2009. Mr. Stern plays a central role in developing the U.S. international policy on climate and is the Administration’s chief climate negotiator, representing the United States internationally at the Ministerial level in all bilateral and multilateral negotiations regarding climate change. Mr. Stern also participates in the development of domestic climate and clean energy policy.

Mr. Stern brings extensive experience in the private sector and government. He was most recently a Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, where he focused on climate change and environmental issues, and a partner at the law firm WilmerHale, where he served as Vice Chair of the Public Policy and Strategy Group.

Mr. Stern served in the White House from 1993 to 1999. As Staff Secretary, he played a central role in preparing the key issues of domestic, economic and national security policy for the President’s decision, as well as handling a number of special assignments. From 1997 to 1999, he coordinated the Administration’s initiative on global climate change, acting as the senior White House negotiator at the Kyoto and Buenos Aires negotiations. At Treasury, from 1999 to 2001, Mr. Stern advised the Secretary on the policy and politics of a broad range of economic and financial issues, and supervised Treasury’s anti-money laundering strategy. Previously, from 1990-93, Stern served as Senior Counsel to Senator Patrick Leahy on the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he advised Senator Leahy on intellectual property, telecommunications and constitutional issues.

After leaving the government, Mr. Stern was an Adjunct Lecturer at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and a Resident Fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

Mr. Stern is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/122554.htm

US envoy rejects suggestion that America bribed countries to sign up to the Copenhagen Accord

Speaking at the Cancún climate change talks, Todd Stern said countries asking for aid are in no position to accuse the US of bribery

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... gen-accord

WikiLeaks cables reveal how US manipulated climate accord

Embassy dispatches show America used spying, threats and promises of aid to get support for Copenhagen accord

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... ate-accord

- WikiLeaks cables: Cancún climate talks doomed to fail, says EU president

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... van-rompuy