Thread: If We Don’t Like Our Criminal President, We Don’t Have To Keep Him–Period

If We Don’t Like Our Criminal President, We Don’t Have To Keep Him–Period

By Donald Joy / 10 November 2013





What’s it going to take? I just finished reading Andrew C. McCarthy’s excellent article appearing in today’s National Review Online, titled “Obama’s Massive Fraud.” McCarthy points out that Martha Stewart was sent to federal prison for doing essentially the same thing Obama has done on a vastly larger scale, with his fraudulent sales pitch of Obamacare–intentionally misrepresenting a situation, knowing that the lie would harm others financially.
McCarthy also describes how CEOs of various firms are routinely dragged into court, sued and prosecuted, even jailed for decades, by Obama’s own administration, for frauds based on omissions of information that utterly pale in comparison to the devastating proportions of the socialist Obamacare scam.

Obama and his abettors have destroyed far more than the private health insurance market. He and his agents have destroyed what remnants existed of the public morale, and trust in our institutions of government. There’s just not much left to believe in, where it comes to public office. The sense of betrayal and demoralization among the citizenry is palpable.

That brings us to exactly why Obama must be forced out. I don’t care that he’s our first black president; if we tolerate this level of high crime, we as a nation don’t even deserve to have a dead raccoon in the Oval Office. For that matter, a dead raccoon would be relatively benevolent (by its mere moot ineffectiveness) in contrast to the Marxist destroyer in there now.

Obama tricked millions of people into voting for him and supporting his plans by telling them blatant lies, over and over and over again. Those of us (such as Sarah Palin) who tried to warn everyone about the scam were smeared and ridiculed, or ignored.
What Obama has done, and who he is, in no real way differs from Bernie Madoff, Richard Scrushy, Ivan Boesky, Michael Milken, Jeffrey Skilling, or Bernie Ebbers. All of them and countless others have gone to federal prison, for their swindling of others in order to gain personally. That’s exactly what Obama did.

Screeching voices on the Left are of course braying that old nonsense about Bush and Iraq, as if Bush and Cheney deliberately did something equivalent to what Obama has done. Please. Bush relied on the same intelligence about WMD that our allies and others at the UN did, and in the final analysis it turned out to be not only fairly accurate (despite enduring myths about the entire affair) but only a part of the multi-faceted rationale for using force to remove Saddam Hussein.

In his article, McCarthy (who happens to be a former top federal prosecutor) lays out the case, and point-blank accuses Obama of criminal fraud, of which Obama is unquestionably guilty. But McCarthy seems almost as convinced that Obama will not be impeached for his high crimes as he is that Obama has deliberately committed them. Although I tend to agree that the situation looks rather hopeless, The Constitution says otherwise.
Refreshingly the opposite of Obama, our Constitution is something we can actually rely on. It says, if we don’t like our president’s high crimes and misdemeanors, we can get rid of him. I, for one, say we must remove Barack Hussein Obama. We have to insist that our representatives bring Articles of Impeachment against this criminal. Taking action is the only way to prove that we deserve better.


About the author: Donald Joy



Following his service in the United State Air Force, Donald Joy earned a bachelor of science in business administration from SUNY while serving in the army national guard. As a special deputy U.S. marshal, Don was on the protection detail for Attorney General John Ashcroft following the attacks of 9/11. He lives in the D.C. suburbs of Northern Virginia with his wife and son.

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/11/dont-l...2FQmVXQJ1ur.99

What The Mainstream Media Isn’t Telling You About Obama’s Approval Ratings

33 minutes ago | Politics, US | Posted by Michael Lotfi

• November 12, 2013

When George Bush was president the media took every opportunity they had to nail him on his poor approval ratings. The mainstream may rarely take the time to tell you that President Obama’s Second Term Blues continue. However, what they do not do is compare President Obama to President Bush, and when they do- they lie.

This MSNBC article says that Obama’s current approval rating of 41% is the lowest it has ever been. According to a Gallup, the President has hit 38% approval rating multiple times. In fact, there are multiple polls showing the same.
In fact, MSNBC has even taken it upon themselves to “clean up” the President’s job approval, as seen in this screenshot from the news network. Obama’s actual approval rating from the poll MSNBC quotes was 41% and disapproval at 53%. You can see how the two are extremely polar.
MSNBC Flips Approval Rating To Disapproval Rating

On average, President Obama has had lower approval ratings than Bush. Take last year’s election for example. According to Gallup, on President Obama’s 1,391 (November, 2012) day in office his approval rating sat at 51%. On Bush’s 1,391 day in office (November, 2004) his approval rating sat at 55%. Both incumbents won reelection.

Three years after their first term elections (quarter 12) President Bush sat at 53% approval, while President Obama sat at 41%.
President Bush finished his first term with a 62% approval rating. His two term average was finished with a 49.5% approval rating. President Obama ended his first term with a 49% approval rating. Obviously the numbers aren’t in yet for the second term to average the two terms. However, his second term trends puts him on track to finish far worse off than President Bush did. Also, we know that historically speaking presidents finish with a lower approval rating in their second term than in their first. Obama started his first term with a 67% approval rating, which has now dipped more than 25 points to sit at 41%.

Even if his second term approval rating was to hold steady he’d finish the two terms with an average approval rating of 45%. If this number holds, President Obama would finish with a two term average lower than any post WWII president. In fact, the only president who would come close would be Nixon, and the two tie at 45%.
Anyone have some spare “change”?

Follow Michael Lotfi On Twitter: @MichaelLotfi



Michael Lotfi


Michael Lotfi is a Persian, American political commentator and adviser living in Nashville, Tennessee where he works as the associate director for the Tenth Amendment Center. Lotfi founded TheLibertyPaper.org, which is an online news source that is visited daily by readers in over 135 countries. Lotfi graduated in the top 5% of the country with top honors from Belmont University, an award winning, private university located in Nashville, Tennessee.


Read more: http://benswann.com/what-the-mainstr...#ixzz2kSXmK1oY

Follow us: @BenSwann_ on Twitter

We have been plagued with terrible, narcissistic, corporate owned, evil, Presidents for as far back as I can remember each one is worse than the next one. This lastest one is by far the worst but that is the scenario we seem to always be facing..I fear for our Country and can't imagine what the next one will be like, all I know is that it must be stopped some how..I can't imagine what the future generations will think of us all..

Democrats? Republicans? Let’s Be Honest, This is War.

By Allan Erickson / 12 November 2013






Let’s be honest and face facts. The Democrat Party is the new communist party in America. The mainstream establishment Republican Party has been co-opted by the New Communist Party in America.

Evidence?

Both Democrats and mainstream establishment Republicans characterize traditional Republicanism and Tea Party conservatives as extremists.
Since when are conservatives like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz extremists for embracing our Founding principles and arguing for a return to a constitutional republic for the sake of saving liberty and prosperity for all?

Furthermore, mainstream Republicans have for years helped Democrats forward the communist cause, working against liberty and prosperity for all.
The time has come, indeed it is long since past time, to form a new coalition called the Patriot Party comprised of real Reagan Republicans, Libertarians, Tea Party folks, and Independents.

We can no longer afford to compromise with those who seek the destruction of our way of life.

This is war.

It is not, and has not been for a long time, a matter of fellow Americans working to form a more perfect union. Democrats and Republicans who’ve become communists and apologists for Jihad are indeed the enemy.

The sooner we face facts and respond accordingly, the sooner we will truly and effectively fight for liberty.

Image: Courtesy of http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Matter; public domain


About the author: Allan Erickson



Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is also the author of "The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence," Tate Publishing, 2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom. To contact him, email: allanlerickson@gmail.com


Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/11/democr...TvTMlivYYBS.99