Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    CITI IS BEYOND REPAIR: WHITNEY TRASHES PLAN

    CITI IS BEYOND REPAIR: WHITNEY TRASHES PLAN

    By KAJA WHITEHOUSE



    May 13, 2008 -- Banking analyst Meredith Whitney blasted Citigroup's turnaround plan yesterday, saying the financial giant is so deep in a black hole that even renown physicist Stephen Hawking could not help the ailing company.

    "We wish [Citi's] management team all the best in their ambitious endeavors, but we fear [it] is past the point of fixing," quipped the Oppenheimer analyst known for her forecast that the company would slash its dividend.

    The biting remarks, in the form of a research note to clients, came on the heels of Citi's long-awaited turnaround plan, unveiled by the bank's executive team on Friday.

    In a nearly four-hour presentation with investors and analysts, CEO Vikram Pandit said the bank aims to get rid of $400 billion in noncore assets but otherwise rejected calls to boost the stock by spinning off units.

    Instead, Pandit outlined plans to further integrate the conglomerate by doing away with overlapping technology systems, among other changes.


    Whitney gave Pandit's presentation two thumbs down, saying it was "glaringly light on actual mechanics," and "almost identical to one given by former CEO Chuck Prince about a year and a half ago."

    Prince, who was dethroned for his role in Citi's mortgage-related losses, stepped down days after Whitney issued her infamous prediction about Citi's dividend and placed an "underperform" rating on Citi's already battered stock.

    Whitney agreed Citi's "antiquated and disparate" technology systems need work, but expressed skepticism about Pandit's plans to pull it off in tough financial times.

    Similar efforts at JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo were "extremely disruptive and expensive," she said.

    Whitney also predicted, in an interview with Bloomberg yesterday, that Citi will be forced to sell major businesses by the end of this year or early next year, and specifically pointed to Banamex, a Mexican bank Citi bought in 2001.

    She also recommended investors sell their shares, which closed up a penny at $23.64 in New York Stock Exchange trading.

    "The credit outlooks and the loss assumptions for banks across the board are way too low," Whitney said. "The outlook for earnings across the board is going to be much worse than people expect."

    kaja.whitehouse@nypost.com

    http://www.nypost.com/seven/05132008/bu ... 110684.htm
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member grandmasmad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Henderson, NV.. formally of So Calif
    Posts
    3,686
    What if you have your checking, credit card and small savings accounts with them?????????????? I moved from Bank of America to them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    The difference between an immigrant and an illegal alien is the equivalent of the difference between a burglar and a houseguest. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
    Posts
    8,464
    Two technical points about this article -

    1. The word spelled renown - should be past tense - eg. 'renowned' (when can front-line journalists in a major news outlet get away with such a typo???)

    and

    2. The graph is a very bad case of misleading through graphs/charts.
    For one, it's y-axis is unlabeled, and only shows the range between the 2 cited prices. (It really, should include something like a minimum - ie '0', and another round number reference value - say 25 or 50...).
    It gives the IMPRESSION that the change in value over that stated time duration is a 'big slide'. But... a change in less than a dollar (24.60 down to 23.64) probably is not. In only represents a change in about 4% of the overall value.

    When you see people trying to pull this over your eyes, but sure to speak up. Statistics, graphs/charts and maps are very common vehicles used to obfuscate the truth.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •