Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    April
    Guest

    Committee Approves Kagan Nomination, Sends to Full Senate

    Committee Approves Kagan Nomination, Sends to Full Senate

    The Senate Judiciary Committee today approved Solicitor General Elena Kagan's nomination to the Supreme Court, but nearly every Republican on the committee opposed her nomination, saying her personal and political views inappropriately drive her legal views.

    Just one Republican joined the Democrats in voting in favor of Kagan's nomination: Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. The final committee vote was 13 to six. Kagan's nomination now goes before the full Senate for consideration; Graham's vot ensures that Democrats will have the 60 votes necessary to overcome a potential Republican filibuster of the nomination.

    Graham said he would clearly prefer a more conservative nominee, but that he has a constitutional obligation to honor President Obama's choice, so long as she is qualified.

    "I could give you 100 reasons on why I could vote 'no.' No one spent more time trying to beat President Obama than I did, except maybe Sen. McCain," Graham said. "But I understood we lost."

    Graham said Mr. Obama chose "wisely" in his nomination. His Republican colleagues disagreed.

    "Much of what she's done has been defined by her involvement in politics," said Sen. Jeff Sessions (Ala.), the top Republican on the committee.

    A judge "must set their politics aside when they put on the robe," Sessions said, adding that he is not convinced Kagan would do so.

    He criticized her testimony before the committee, saying she "repeatedly chose to give the committee political spin."

    Sessions added on CBSNews.com's "Washington Unplugged" today that Kagan's career indicates she has some "serious judgmental flaws and errors" that are "quite significant."

    Democrats flatly disagreed.

    "There's no question Elena Kagan is eminently qualified" to join the Supreme Court, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said. Like other Democrats, Feinstein praised Kagan for her inclination to reach out to others with different views, as she did as dean of Harvard Law School when she hired a number of conservative faculty members.

    "I, for one, have very high hopes for the philosophy of moderation and restraint that a Justice Kagan could bring to the court," Feinstein said.

    CBSNews.com Special Report: Elena Kagan

    Feinstein said Kagan's "credentials place her squarely among our nation's top legal minds" and that her reasoning, composure and humor were all apparent during her confirmation hearings.

    Along with citing Kagan's personal political views, Republicans also complained that Kagan revealed little to the committee about how she would serve as a judge. Republican Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.) criticized Kagan of being "disingenuous" in her testimony.

    Added Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), "She failed to answer many of the questions posed to her... I worry that if confirmed her deep set personal beliefs will cause her to overturn precedent."

    Democratic Sen. Herb Kohl (Wisc.) also complained "the substance of her answers were so general at times it would be difficult to distinguish her answers from any other nominee." He said, however, that Kagan's vague answers speak to problems inherent in the confirmation hearing process, not to problems with Kagan's nomination.

    Kagan, he said, is "unquestionably qualified."

    "I believe her judicial philosophy is in the mainstream of our country's thought," he said.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162- ... eakingnews

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    What a sad day. Our Supreme Court has been grotesquely weakened with the last two nominations. I feel for the seasoned justices who will have to deal with the Obama mess for life.

    but nearly every Republican on the committee opposed her nomination,
    I didn't even have to read the next sentence to know it was Graham.

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    Shame on Lindsey Graham.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,880
    Progressives.

    Psalm 23, it is written,..."The Lord is my Shepherd..."
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  5. #5
    Senior Member SicNTiredInSoCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mexico's Maternity Ward :(
    Posts
    6,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie
    What a sad day. Our Supreme Court has been grotesquely weakened with the last two nominations. I feel for the seasoned justices who will have to deal with the Obama mess for life.

    but nearly every Republican on the committee opposed her nomination,
    I didn't even have to read the next sentence to know it was Graham.

    Dixie
    Yes, we are really gonna be screwed if one of the conservatives retire. At least Dumbo Ears replaced a lib with a lib, instead of a conservative with a lib.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    April
    Guest
    ....Traitors....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •