Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #31
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Mad World News

    Governor Signs Bill Giving Police the Right to Decide Who Can Own Firearms
    http://madworldnews.com/governor-sig...-can-firearms/
    Glad I don't live in that state.



    Governor Signs Bill Giving Police the Right to Decide Who Can Own Firearms

    in Gun Rights, News, Politics / by Brandon Walker / on August 15, 2014 at 10:34 am /

    Governor Deval Patrick signed an extensive overhaul of Massachusetts gun laws. It gives police chiefs the right to deny people the firearms identification cards needed to purchase guns because they “feel” individuals may be unsuitable.If you are a Second Amendment supporter living in Massachusetts, now may be the time to stock up before the new law signed by Governor Deval Patrick takes effect.When the NRA reported on a Boston Public Radio broadcast of Boston Police Chief Evans stating that he had the right to say who should and who shouldn’t have a gun or a shotgun, many thought he was just blowing off steam.
    “For the most part, nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle, and I don’t know a lot of people who are into hunting who, being lifelong residents, would actually want that who lives in the city, but, especially here in the city I want to have discretion over who’s getting any type of gun because public safety is my main concern and as you know it’s an uphill battle taking as many guns off the street right now without pumping more into the system.” ~Boston Public Radio
    Many also called the NRA paranoid gun nuts.Turns out the NRA was reporting the truth.
    According to Huffington Post, Governor Patrick signed off on the extensive gun control overhaul for his state on Wednesday.The bill allows for the police chief to do just what he said he wanted to do. It allows for the police to have the power to go to court and to deny the firearms registration cards this new bill requires in order to buy a rifle or shotgun if the police feel the individual shouldn’t have one.Under this new bill, police would have to state the reason to deny in writing and the individual would have the right to appeal the police decision. Appealing it does not stop the denial until after it is successfully appealed. Under the new law, you’re guilty until proven innocent.The bill makes other changes to current gun laws as well, some good and some not so great. It creates a Web based portal through the Executive Office of Public Safety to allow real time background checks, stiffens penalties for some gun based crimes, and the creation of a “firearms tracking unit” to be formed using the Massachusetts State Police. The bill mandates that the schools have and implement a direct communication system between fire departments and police departments in the events of emergencies. It mandates school personnel receive two hours of mandatory suicide prevention classes at least every three years.It seems that when the final legislation left the Massachusetts congress, they did not give Governor Patrick his one firearm a month limit on purchases he wanted.Gun control advocates hail Governor Patrick’s signing of the bill as one that makes Massachusetts “a leader for the rest of the nation.”The NRA and other gun control groups feel that giving the authority to police to be able to deny a firearm “because they feel like it” opens up potential for abuse of power like never seen before.The Second Amendment is very clear: “Shall Not Be Infringed”What do you think of this new legislation?

    http://madworldnews.com/governor-sig...-can-firearms/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #32
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Gun Rights Across America shared a link.



    New York City Begins Gun Confiscation - BuzzPo
    New York begins gun confiscation.
    buzzpo.com



    New York City Begins Gun Confiscation

    By Steven Ahle on August 16, 2014 in Democrats, Gun control, Liberal Fascism

    The city of New York is serious about gun confiscation. They have sent a notice to all gun owner’s who are in possession of rifles and shotguns. (Still think gun registration doesn’t lead to confiscation?) All guns capable of holding more than five shots are now outlawed. Here is the letter that gun owners began receiving :
    “It appears you are in possession of a rifle and/or Shotgun (listed below) that has an ammunition feeding device capable of holding more than five (5) rounds of ammunition. Rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than five (5) rounds of ammunition are unlawful to possess in New York City, as per NYC Administrative Code 10-306 (b).”
    “You have the following options,” the letter explains.
    “1. Immediately surrender your Rifle and/or Shotgun to your local police precinct, and notify this office of the invoice number. The firearm may be sold or permanently removed from the City of New York thereafter.
    LISTEN to BuzzPo Radio: Bad Tech: Why Civil Libertarians and Believers in Small Government Should Fight Against Self-Driving Cars with All of Their Hearts and SoulsClick PLAY to Listen:

    2. Permanently remove your Rifle and/or Shotgun from New York City and provide the following…Disposition Report/Registration Certificate…Notarized statement of permanent removal…Utility bill or other proof of residency regarding the address where the firearm will be stored outside the City of New York.
    3. You may call to discuss the matter if you believe your firearm is in compliance…”
    Liberals keep saying that universal registration does not lead to gun confiscation. That is a lie. We see examples of it in New York state withe Safe Act and with cities who refuse to recognize the second amendment. The fault lies with the Supreme Court. Sure, they have ruled for gun owners many times over the last ten years, but they have failed to define the amendment with a solid guideline as to how far cities and states can go with regulating guns.

    This is not your grandfather’s America.

    Read more here:

    http://buzzpo.com/new-york-city-begi...-confiscation/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #33
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #34
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #35
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Michelle Obama Promises To CONFISCATE ALL FIREARMS Before Leaving The White House
    Well it appears that Michelle Obama is not yet done championing her own agenda. According to recent reports, Michelle recently decided to appear in Chicago to...
    secretsofthefed.com

    Article at the page link:

    http://www.secretsofthefed.com/miche...g-white-house/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #36
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    BREAKING: CT Governor Declares State of Emergency Due to Ebola

    By Reagan Wilson on October 7, 2014



    UPDATE: This post is getting a ton of traffic from Facebook over the last 48 hours. If you could please leave a comment with what page or group shared it, that would be most appreciated.
    The state of Connecticut has become the first to declare a state of public health emergency over the possibility of an ebola virus outbreak in the United States.
    According to NBC CT,
    He signed an order declaring the emergency on Tuesday, giving the Commissioner of the state Department of Public Health the authority to quarantine and isolate people whom the commissioner “reasonably believes has been exposed to the Ebola virus.”
    Malloy said this is not in response to any specific case, but is meant to provide state health officials with the authority necessary to “prevent any potential transmission of the Ebola virus within the State of Connecticut.”
    “We are taking this action today to ensure that we are prepared, in advance, to deal with any identified cases in which someone has been exposed to the virus or, worst case, infected,” Malloy said in a statement.
    “Our state’s hospitals have been preparing for it, and public health officials from the state are working around the clock to monitor the situation. Right now, we have no reason to think that anyone in the state is infected or at risk of infection. But it is essential to be prepared and we need to have the authorities in place that will allow us to move quickly to protect public health, if and when that becomes necessary. Signing this order will allow us to do that.”
    Declaring a state of emergency can give state governments different powers than they normally have and these provisions vary from state to state.
    Ebola was first identified in the United States in Dallas, Texas when a citizen of Liberia was hospitalized with the disease. Since then, several other possible cases are being evaluated in other parts of the country and hundreds of people who may have had contact with the Dallas patient are being watched by officials for signs of the virus.

    http://controversialtimes.com/news/b...-due-to-ebola/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •