Results 1 to 10 of 32
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Threaded View
-
01-21-2007, 05:13 AM #1
Constitutional Law Conversation .... Alberto Gonzales ;)
Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost
First, though, I'll agree that Alberto's claims do not stem from his misapprehension of constitutional law. He probably does understand it, choosing to ignore it for political purposes and convenience and the love of power.
But listen to me. The Uniform Commercial Code in its entirety, including the little-cited reservation of rights clause, simply strives to make uniform the commercial law of the states, including sales, secured transactions, and commercial paper, such as checks, drafts, promissory notes and the like. The aim is to streamline commerce so it's less cumbersome, to the benefit of all.
The UCC has absolutely no, as in "none" "nada" "zippo", application to anything Alberto's concerning himself with or divorcing himself from.
The remainder of your claims truly require an enlargement of the meaning of "bizarre".
Nothing you've set forth in your post is taught in any bar-accredited law school. And should it ever be so, the law school in scenario would be placed on an accelerated fast-track to lose its accredited status.
You could dissuade me of my position were you to supply me with the cite to a single court case, appellate or lower, or a single law review article, from among the 180 or so ABA-accredited law schools, that supports your position.
That is to say, you cannot dissuade me.
But I issue the challenge. What authority, other than the synapitic impulse preceding your typing fingers, do you have to support your position?
EXPOSED! UNITED NATIONS HAS A SECRET PLAN TO INVADE AMERICA |...
05-20-2024, 11:43 PM in Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism