Copenhagen Propaganda Still Winning

Climate – Still Not Getting It!

By Barry Napier
Monday, November 30, 2009

I watch the news and comments about climate claims and The Copenhagen Summit with increasing frustration. Despite the recent email revelations and growing numbers of scientists who are defecting to the good side, people are still not getting it!

The climate scandal is not about arrogant scientists who want to influence fellow scientists with stupidity and crass bad science (which is never successful because their colleagues aren’t stupid). It is about politicians who are using what they say to change the world without our consent.

The BBC refused to make the email scandal public, because it is just a government puppet. It is overrun by PC environmentalist editors, producers and writers. It actually believes what that great showman and rusty anthropologist, David Attenborough, says in his glossy programmes, but they get rid of loftier scientists who are real, working experts, such as David Bellamy, because they express doubts about global warming. No scientific process for the BBC – it gets in the way of a jolly good fictional series! And the BBC continues to up the pressure by putting out even more pro-climate argument programmes. This is called blowing out a smoke-screen. Or, lying your head off. Or, being utterly deceitful using public money. Or, being scientific scammers. (Add any other titles you wish to use. I’m sure there are hundreds).
Petition Failure

Very recently I tried on four occasions to get a petition going on the official 10 Downing Street website, demanding (not requesting) an immediate stop to everything it is doing based on false science. Of course, it got nowhere… each one was rejected on grounds that it ‘might be wrong or libellous’! Eh? It is okay for the government to get it wrong and libellous, and to spread blatant propaganda, but not for a member of the public to even raise a question about its infallibility.
Treason

The real reason the petitions were rejected was that they came far too close to the Copenhagen Summit! The government doesn’t want anyone rocking the boat on the eve it wishes to commit another act of treason. Not only did Gordon Brown sign Britain into the clutches of the EU without the nation’s consent, but he is also to attend the summit to again sign us over to another foreign power – this time the UN. By any country’s law, this is outright treason. Obama will do the same thing – and that, too, is treason. But, everyone seems to think it is okay. By ‘everyone’ I mean all those who are allowed to speak by government. Those who dissent are silenced or simply ignored.

Bad science should just be shown up for what it is, by scientists. And that is the proper way to deal with it. But, when scientists themselves cook the books and prevent others from finding out the truth, that hikes up the seriousness of it by a hundred notches.

The problem is not that scientists behave badly (because science is rife with these intellectual ruffians), but that they get politicians to do the same. Once they do that, and politicians force everyone to obey… that is the main point… and it hikes the seriousness by a thousand more notches.

I don’t really care if some scientists act stupidly. When they do, they bring ridicule upon themselves, damaging their own reputations and making a mess of their intellectual prowess. What I care about is when bad, and often fraudulent, science, is used against the people. I have already detailed the results of this kind of socialistic propaganda, and it is frightening.

Just look at information passed off as news in the last few days:
Dr Mark Penning, president of WAZA, a global network of zoos, said that ‘thousands of species of animals face extinction if the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is not reduced.’ This is all window dressing for Copenhagen, to help force leaders into the CO2 quagmire.

Similar messages are being issued constantly in the short time before the Summit comes to its inevitably horrendous conclusions. But, the hacked emails and the views of ‘other’ scientists are kept away from public view! This illustrates my main point. Whoever you are, you should be very concerned. Even if you think you are a socialist, bear in mind that once Marxism takes hold, even you will be downtrodden as a mere bit of dirt under the hobnailed boots of our totalitarian leaders.

The theory behind this world-zoo claim is one that has already been debunked by genuine scientists, but is still used by greenies. They can get away with it because the media won’t allow dissent, and neither will governments. The zoos say if CO2 continues to rise, it will also cause temperature to rise. That’s why I am frustrated! How can people in zoos tell the world that species in the wild will die if CO2 rises? It is impossible!

How can a man in charge of a zoo organisation know anything about climate science? They can only get their views from bad science. So, why listen to the zoos? I am not against people in a variety of disciplines making their point known, but not when that point is merely a repeat of debunked and false science. Otherwise, others of intelligence are quite free to speak as they wish. The problem arises when they pass this off as genuine, and when what they say affects my freedom.

Paul Pearce-Kelly, a senior curator at London Zoo, makes similar claims to those made by WAZA. I do not wish to disparage the man, but when comments like his are used to strong-arm people like me into paying huge taxes and be made a slave to the UN, I am not amused. What does a curator at a zoo know about climatology? Nothing. By all means hold your view as an opinion – but don’t present it as expert knowledge, when even climatologists are faking it. Even though my own articles are strongly worded, I must rely on genuine climatologists for my information, though I can see the errors of science-logic myself. Especially when true science shows that temperature change precedes a rise in CO2 by hundreds of years. Get my drift?

The biggest threat to animal species is not climate or CO2, but the activities of hunters, tree-fellers and mighty eco-fuel conglomerates. They are removing trees and habitats for the sake of money. So, don’t blame CO2, and don’t blame humans for ‘damage’ supposedly caused by the CO2 increase. ‘Other’ science says something different. If even climatologists get it wrong, there is no valid reason to rush ahead and force a socialist conclusion to the coming Summit.
Hey! You’ve Been Debunked!

In genuine science, conclusions come after a long period of scientific study and falsification, etc. But, say our greeny deceivers, if we wait until that happens, “it will be too late.â€