Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member American-ized's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Monroe County, New York
    Posts
    3,530

    Democrats face delays on filibuster reform

    Democrats face delays on filibuster reform

    The Hill
    By Michael O'Brien
    01/04/11 07:43 AM ET

    Democrats face delays in their effort to reform Senate rules to weaken the filibuster, a leader of that effort acknowledged Monday night.

    Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said Democrats' attempt to adopt new Senate rules would wait until later in January, when they would try to execute the so-called "constitutional option" to change Senate rules with a simple majority.

    "Right now, the Senate majority leader is planning for us to come in just for a single day this Wednesday and then come back in on the 23rd or 24th," Merkley said on MSNBC.

    It is at that point — not on Wednesday, as had been originally thought — that Democrats will attempt to modify Senate rules to weaken the filibuster, one of the principal tools of the minority in the chamber.

    Democrats have argued they have the power, under the Constitution, to change the Senate's rules with only a simple majority on the chamber's first day of operations. To execute the plan in later January, they would have to technically extend the current session until later this month, and officially begin work on the next term on Jan. 23 or 24.


    "By precedent, by tradition, which weighs heavily in the Senate, and by a certain common sense logic, at the start of a two-year period, you set your rules out at the beginning," said Merkley, who noted the Senate may not formally adjourn before then.

    Democrats have complained the GOP has abused the filibuster to obstruct and slow down legislation to the point where every measure needs a supermajority of 60 votes to advance.

    "We're, in fact, in a constant state of filibuster," Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), a major proponent of reform, said Monday night on NPR.

    Every Democratic senator has signed on to a letter endorsing reform in some form, but concern about the specifics of the reform, and how it could affect the party if it loses the majority, have contributed to pushing back any action.

    Udall's proposal would eliminate secret holds on nominations and possibly narrow the opportunities senators would have to wage filibusters. In exchange, the minority party in the Senate — for now, Republicans — might enjoy more opportunities to offer and approve amendments.

    Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) will lay out the GOP position on filibuster reform later Tuesday when he speaks at the Heritage Foundation.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... filibuster

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,809
    You have to be kidding me? DO my eyes deceive me or are they talking about keeping the session with the senators thrown out until late Jan>????

    W
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Seems a bit tyrannical, just a bit!

    The house of cards looks a little shaky.........don't breathe.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •