Thread: Dem's Auto Industry Bailout a UAW Bailout, Group Says

Democrats’ Auto Industry Bailout Is A UAW Bailout, Group Says

Thursday, November 13, 2008
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor


(CNSNews.com) – Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) reportedly plans to unveil a $25-billion auto industry bailout plan next week, on Tuesday, Nov. 18.

Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, is writing a bill that would allow the auto industry to get some of the $700 billion intended to restore liquidity in the nation’s financial markets.

But a union watchdog group says Frank’s plan really is intended to bail out the United Auto Workers union.

Frank's legislation would allow the U.S. government to take an equity stake in the auto companies in exchange for the taxpayer loans, the Associated Press quoted Frank's spokesman, Steven Adamske, as saying.

"A collapse of the American automobile industry would be the worst possible thing that could happen at a time when we are already weakened," Frank told reporters on Wednesday.

"We're not asking the taxpayers to throw good money after bad," Frank said. There will be "protections about getting it repaid," he said. "The consequences of not doing it will be worse." Frank did not divulge details of the bill.

General Motors, Ford and Chrysler are lobbying Congress to approve the bailout, the Associated Press reported. The auto industry has been hard-hit by the recession and the credit crunch.

GM, the nation's largest automaker, has warned it could run out of cash by the end of the year without taxpayer help.

‘UAW bailout’

It is a mistake to use part of the $700-billion rescue package to reward high-tax, non-right-to-work states such as Michigan, says Peter Flaherty, President of the National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC).

“The automaker bailout is actually a UAW bailout,â€

I was watching Fox Business News last night and that's exactly what they are saying. It's a bailout for the unions. The cost of the cars is directly linked to the cost of all the benefits from the unions.

If they go under the labor union goes under. QUIT GIVING MEMBERS MONEY TO THE POLITICIANS.

The cost of the cars is directly linked to the cost of all the benefits from the unions.

Exactly. If they are busy making the world work for a pittance and their own citizens unable to afford them......this is never go end the problem or fix anything.....and I doubt people from other parts of the world want to fund thier benefits while they're struggling as well.....anymore than I do. I want to see auto makers here......but frankly, when they dropped us like a bunch of hot potatoes for cheap labor while the costs went through the roof.......I don't have much sympathy for them.....it's for all those below who are dependant on them I feel for.

Democrats Urge Federal Stake in Big Auto Companies

Wednesday, November 12, 2008 6:30 PM

WASHINGTON -- Congressional Democrats are pushing legislation to send $25 billion in emergency loans to the beleaguered auto industry in exchange for a government ownership stake in the Big Three car companies.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., hope for quick passage of the auto bailout during a postelection session that begins Monday.

Legislation being drafted by Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, would dip into the $700 billion Wall Street rescue money, approved by Congress last month, for the auto aid.

President Bush is cool to that idea. But the White House says he is open to helping the industry, which is buckling under poor sales, tight credit and a sputtering economy.

In an Oval Office meeting Monday, President-elect Obama spoke to Bush about doing more to aid the industry, aides said, and Bush said he was open to it.

Any effort to throw the companies a lifeline could run into GOP roadblocks that could derail it in the Senate. In that chamber, Republicans, including some who believe their votes for the Wall Street bailout hurt, and in some cases doomed, their re-election bids, are loath to agree to any new money.

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the minority leader, was noncommittal about additional aid. In a statement, his spokesman said Congress should move to speed the release of a $25 billion loan program passed earlier to help the carmakers develop fuel-efficient vehicles.

"It may be that there are changes that need to be made in order to expedite these low-interest loans. Other ideas have been floated and all will receive a review as we approach the Senate's return next week," said Don Stewart, the spokesman.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Wednesday the auto sector was "critical," but that the financial industry rescue was not designed for car companies.

"Any solution has got to be leading to long-term viability" for auto companies, Paulson said.

He also suggested Congress could try to use the loan program already in place to help the companies.

But Democrats say those loans were designed to help automakers adapt to new fuel standards, not to stave off the financial disaster the companies now say is imminent.

Sen. Carl M. Levin, D-Mich., is working with Frank, D-Mass., on the auto bailout.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said the administration is not responsible for the automakers' woes but understands the importance of the industry. Officials are reluctant to make any proposals for new aid, suggesting the companies hold much of the responsibility for their own survival.

The companies have made business decisions "over the years that have led to this situation, but we have gone as far as we can with the authority Congress has given in order to help industries," Perino said.

Frank's legislation would carve out a portion of the $700 billion financial rescue program for the Big Three automakers, letting the government take an equity stake in them in exchange for the loans, said Frank's spokesman, Steven Adamske.

The Treasury could take warrants to share in a portion of future profits and would have to be paid back before any other shareholder. The car companies would face tougher restrictions on awarding pay packages to executives and dividends to their shareholders than the financial companies that get a piece of the original bailout.

Auto executives, labor leaders and other industry proponents are mounting an intense lobbying effort for a bailout, painting a grim scenario for the economy if even one of the Big Three companies were to go under. They want an immediate $25 billion loan to keep the companies operating and a separate $25 billion to help cover future health care obligations for retirees and their dependents.

The Big Three and United Auto Workers will have a high-profile chance to make their case at a hearing next Wednesday before Frank's committee, where executives from Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Corp. and a UAW leader are scheduled to testify Wednesday.

"It is critical that the nation understand this isn't just a Michigan problem, that one in 10 jobs in the country are impacted by the auto industry," Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm said in an interview.

A House vote on Frank's measure could come as early as next Thursday.

Democratic leaders also are considering pairing the measure with a broader economic aid bill including money for unemployed workers whose jobless benefits have run out, aides said. It was not clear whether such legislation could get enough support to pass.

Pelosi on Tuesday urged "immediate action" for the industry, while Reid noted it would only happen with bipartisan support from Bush and Senate Republicans.

Her request came less than a week after GM and Ford posted bleak third-quarter earnings reports. GM, the nation's largest automaker, posted a $2.5 billion quarterly loss Friday and warned that it may run out of money by the end of the year without government aid.

"We're in a situation where there's a great unknown about what will happen," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. "And a great concern that at least one of the companies will find themselves in a situation where they cannot make it until Jan. 20," when President-elect Obama is inaugurated.

Democratic leaders will need to convince some skeptical lawmakers who question whether a bailout would cause changes in the auto industry or simply lead to more handout requests from other industries.

"Once we cross the divide from financial institutions to individual corporations, truly, where would you draw the line?" asked Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

Headline Story
NewsMax.com
http://www.newsmax.com/

[quote]President-elect Obama faces a dilemma, Flaherty said. “If he provides a short-term fix now on the UAW's terms, these companies are doomed. Later, he will face requests for even more taxpayer money.â€