Thread: DOES MIDTERM REPUBLICAN LANDSLIDE SOLVE PROBLEM

DOES THE MIDTERM REPUBLICAN LANDSLIDE SOLVE THE PROBLEM?

By Dr. Michael S. Coffman Ph. D.
November 20, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

As forecast, the November, 2010 elections were an overwhelming victory for Republicans, with a pickup of at least sixty seats in the House, six seats in the Senate and twelve state governorships. It was more than a victory; it was the biggest political blowout in sixty years. The Republican blowout increased the Republican-controlled governorships to 30. Over 500 legislative seats also went from Democrat to Republican, giving Republicans control of more than 20 new chambers and more seats than anytime since 1928.

Many conservatives are disappointed that the Republicans did not take the majority in the Senate. However, the failure to gain control of the Senate was certainly not surprising. The majority of Senate seats up for grab in 2010 were in predominantly strong Democratic states like New York and California. As explained later, the lack of control in the Senate will work for the Republicans

From a purely political point of view, the importance of the 2010 Midterm Republican blowout cannot be overstated. It was a major victory for the American people. However, it would be a big mistake, to think the threat of overspending and big government is over and we can go back to sleep. That is exactly what the global elite want. Twentieth Century historian Carroll Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope that the elite manipulate elections in order to keep “the two parties almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.â€

What is still not understood by political leaders and the American people is that the real threat has never been about Republicans or Democrats; it is about the progressive cancer infecting both political parties. Some of the 2010 Republican victors are even progressives themselves. That is how the elite have been able to continue their agenda regardless of which party was in control.

Arizona... your boy McCain is not what he says he is .. some call him a RINO .. others know him as a Progressive .. either way, you got a mess on your hands

That is how the elites have been able to continue their agenda regardless of which party was in control.

I never realized I was poor, until the progressives wanted what little I have.