Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Hybrid View
-
05-24-2014, 06:36 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,087
Obamacare’s “Bailout” of Insurers Is Still a Live, Moving Target
By John R. Graham
Tuesday May 20, 2014 10:38 AM PDT
0 Comments
The Obama administration continues to move the goalposts of the so-called “bailout” of health insurance companies that lose money in the Obamacare exchanges. Formally labelled “risk corridors,” the bailouts are a process by which the administration will take money from insurers that profit more than expected in the exchanges, and transfer that money to insurers that lose more money than expected.
Unfortunately, taxpayers are at risk because the revenue coming into the risk corridors is determined by insurance premiums, whereas the payouts are determined by medical claims. If, overall, the insurers charged premiums that are too low, the risk corridors will suffer deficits. We have covered this topic thoroughly in past blog posts, and we expect significant deficits. Our previous entry on the topic questioned the administration’s assertion that the risk corridors would be budget neutral.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has just published the final rule for 2015, which includes two things relevant to the “bailout.” First, it confirms that it will increase the payout from the risk corridors, as first proposed in March.
Second, it takes a significant step toward abandoning the fantasy of budget neutrality: “In the unlikely event of a shortfall for the 2015 program year, HHS recognizes that the Affordable Care Act requires the Secretary to make full payments to issuers. In that event, HHS will use other sources of funding for the risk corridors payments, subject to the availability of appropriations.” (pp. 80-81)
This is a very important statement, because it is the first time the Obama administration has admitted that appropriations are required to use general revenues to make the risk corridors whole. Republicans in the House and Senate have asserted this requirement, and the final rule puts them in the driver’s seat if the risk corridors suffer a shortfall.
How will Republicans use this newly admitted power if the shortfall appears, and the health insurers ramp up their lobbying efforts to ensure they get their risk-corridor payments? Obamacare’s opponents will be watching closely.
* * *For the pivotal alternative to Obamacare, please see the Independent Institute’s widely acclaimed book: Priceless: Curing the Healthcare Crisis, by John C. Goodman.
Tags: Affordable Care Act, Bailouts, Government subsidies, Healthcare, Insurance
http://blog.independent.org/2014/05/...moving-target/
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Similar Threads
-
Third Largest Insurance Company May Abandon Obamacare Over Failure To Enroll New Acco
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 1Last Post: 01-26-2014, 05:08 AM -
TARP Was Bad, but the Looming Obamacare Bailout for Corrupt Insurance Companies Worse
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 01-04-2014, 06:44 AM -
Rubio anti-bailout bill: Insurance industry under ObamaCare headed for death spiral
By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 11-21-2013, 01:43 AM -
Report: Artists, Writers, Photographers To Lose Health Insurance Because of Obamacare
By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 09-06-2013, 08:49 AM -
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE is owned by Peter Lewis
By HAPPY2BME in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 3Last Post: 08-20-2012, 07:31 AM


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote

Republican Lawmakers Demand Action After Somali Gangs Open Fire...
07-24-2026, 09:25 PM in General Discussion