Thread: Elizabeth Warren - Promotes Bare Naked Socialism in America as Possible Presidential

CHOICE TIME!

D’Souza v. Warren: Which America Will We Have?




Written by Rick David on July 21, 2014

A few weeks back I wrote about the D’Souza movie America, Imagine the World Without Her. I came away from that movie proud of the America I was born into which was built by our founders. I came away angry at the Marxists and revisionist historians that have painted a picture of the old America as an evil, oppressive nation. As D’Souza says, these revisionists have an agenda to remake America and their plans require that the idea of the old America be deconstructed. Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform” America can only be understood from the perspective of this agenda. This week, I saw something that led me to believe that the transformation that these Marxists envisioned has largely been accomplished.

I saw a video of a speech given by Senator Elizabeth Warren at the Netroots convention. Senator Warren (who also is featured in America) is the new darling of the radical left who are beginning to understand that Hillary Clinton has too much negative baggage. Warren gave a speech that any Bolshevik would be proud of, demonizing the rich and Republicans. She appeals to the basest instincts of her hate-filled mob in advancing her class warfare. Her rhetoric lacks even a minute shred of truth or evidence, but that means nothing to her enthusiastic supporters. They are whipped into a frenzied desire for revenge on the rich. Their instrument of revenge will be the government. After observing, I posted this on Face Book:

I predict this woman will be the Dems 2016 POTUS candidate. She will demonize Republicans as rich bankers ripping off the middle class and play the class warfare game. She will probably get the votes of the majority of women, Millenials, blacks, the welfare class (47%), Hispanics, dead voters and the liberal hate America elite. The Republicans will probably nominate a fat cat rich banker RINO like Romney. Who do you think will win? The majority of folks responding to this rightly point out that Warren is a communist and a liar. I would remind you that this was well known when she ran for the Senate, yet did not prevent her from being elected. The same can be said of Obama, who was elected twice, in spite of the facts. I would suggest that most conservatives and godly folk fail to recognize that this country is under the control of a reprobate people and demonic hordes. A majority of voters are motivated by greed and hate and could care less about truth or virtue. They use the corrupt process and the government to steal from their fellow man. The only hope for our nation is a revival and repentance. We must return to faith in Jesus Christ. 2 Chron. 7:14

When I say that the agenda has largely been accomplished, I’m not saying that our country has become a communist country in terms of our governing structure. The transformation is not yet complete in that respect, though plans abound to do so. The transformation has occurred in our culture. The societal changes will make the political transformation more acceptable to the majority.

I think that those of us who hold traditional American values have lost the culture war for the hearts and minds of most Americans. In that respect, we’ve already lost the America portrayed by D’ Souza. It seems that America is now ruled by a reprobate mob of corrupt politicians who appeal to a godless horde. I assert that most Americans are motivated by their own selfish desires and are willing to get theirs at the expense of their fellow man. And they are happy to have the government steal from others to get it.

Most Americans worship a popular culture that deifies free sex and glorifies sodomy. We murder the innocent unborn by the millions. We randomly assault the aged. Our youth are violent and disrespectful. Only a minority value truth, justice, fidelity, industry, responsibility, and compassion.

More than half a century ago we were warned that the Marxists had an agenda to destroy our culture. FBI agent Cleon Skousen’s book The Naked Communist enumerated the goals of the communists. He warned that they planned to use the courts to weaken American institutions, to use the schools and teachers unions to indoctrinate children with communist propaganda, to infiltrate the press and media, to eliminate obscenity laws, promote pornography, to teach sodomy and promiscuity as “normal”, to infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social justice” advocacy, to discredit the Constitution, and to discredit the family as a valued institution among other perverse goals.
The communists must have read De Tocqueville because they too understood that American greatness and freedom could be destroyed by corrupting the morals of our people. To a large extent, I think they have succeeded. That this country would twice elect a man such as Obama is the proof. The popularity of Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren is further proof.

As I commented in my Face Book post, the only hope for our nation is a revival of faith in Christ. Neither the Republicans, nor any politician, will save us. I’m not advocating that Christians neglect their civic responsibility by failing to vote. That is a sin. But, don’t expect leadership from the political class. I see no one in that class who is likely to lead us to repentance.

What this country needs is a Moses. The American church has preached the grace and love of Christ, but has neglected to preach the holiness and justice of God. Most Americans spit on Christ’s grace and love. We need a Jonathan Edwards to warn Americans that they stand on the edge of hell.

Image; http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/2011...gop-over-cfpb/

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/07/choice-time-dsouza-v-warren-america-will/#CylizPX7iEVB1ubP.99


Co-Operating w/ Saul: Alinsky’s 8 Things That Need to Happen




Written by Larry Usoff on July 21, 2014

How many do you count as having already happened? Be sure to read all the way to the end.

Saul Alinsky, a quick biography… Saul David Alinsky, born January 30, 1909, Chicago , Illinois. Died June 12, 1972 (aged 63), Carmel-by-the-Sea, California, from a heart attack. Educated at University of Chicago, Ph.B.1930, U. of Chicago Graduate School, criminology, 1930-1932. Occupation: Community organizer, writer, political activist and known for Political activism, writing, community organization. Notable work(s): Reveille for Radicals(1946); Rules for Radicals(1971); Awards: Pacem in Terris (Peace On Earth) Award, 1969.
Saul David Alinsky (January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972) was an American community organizer and writer. He is generally considered to be the founder of modern community organizing. He is often noted for his book Rules for Radicals. He and his third wife (Irene McInnis) were the socialists that Barack Obama has studied and he followed their community organizer philosophy. His book Rules for Radicals is dedicated to Satan.

How to create a socialist state by Saul Alinsky:

There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a socialist state. The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare–Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty–Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt–-Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control–-Remove people’s ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare–Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)
6) Education–Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school. Think: “Common Core”
7) Religion-–Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.
Class Warfare-–Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

Any of this sound familiar? Because it is exactly the agenda that the current president is following and, if it continues to the logical ending, the United States will be just a footnote in history – a noble experiment that didn’t last long enough.

The country CAN be turned around, but it will take a person whose loyalty is to the United States, whose background is rooted in The American Experience, and a person who puts the welfare of the country before any partisan debts. There ARE such people still in this country, but character assassination, coupled with investigations to unearth the tiniest bit of information that will hurt that person, make it nearly impossible for people with good intentions to stand for political office.

In my opinion, governance should not be a career because it ceases to be objective and endows the holder of an office with the thought that they are, somehow, better than the people that elected them. That they, because of some falsely-thought-of exalted position, do not have to follow the same laws that the rest of us do. The president has term limits, and rightly so, so why don’t the rest of the federal employees? That would put an end to the elitist class that has emerged over many decades, and which, if allowed to continue, will eventually aid in the downfall of America.

“The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference and undernourishment.”–Robert M. Hutchins, former president & chancellor–University of Chicago

There it is, folks. If it was laid out any clearer it would have to be a video. Take a bit of advice about history: you learn from it, or you will repeat it, take your choice.

Image: http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/il...ger-ahead.html


Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/07/co-ope...mgrPtr83llD.99


Actually democracy can take a hike we have or had a Republic..Wake up America..

Senator Elizabeth Warren Speaks Up For Progressivism

July 22, 2014 by Against Crony Capitalism

SPECIAL

This article by Hunter Lewis was originally published by AgainstCronyCapitalism.org.
Good for her! Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is letting us know where she stands. There’s no oily evasiveness for her — or at least there’s less than we usually get from politicians.
Here are Warren’s 11 tenets of today’s progressivism, outlined in a July 18 speech before Netroots Nation. Below each tenet are a few questions for her.
1. “We believe that Wall Street needs stronger rules and tougher enforcement, and we’re willing to fight for it.”
Will you fight to end government bailouts? How will you end them if Wall Street is operated as a subsidiary of Washington? How will you end them if Washington needs big Wall Street firms to buy its bonds with money created by Washington?
The real problem here is that government control, tough or not, is destroying the market’s own internal discipline. Markets aren’t just about profits. They are also about bankruptcy. Wall Street firms must be allowed to fail.
2. “We believe in science, and that means that we have a responsibility to protect this Earth.”
So progressivism is backed by science and other political philosophies aren’t? People who disagree with you don’t care about the Earth?
3. “We believe that the Internet shouldn’t be rigged to benefit big corporations, and that means real net neutrality.”
Rigged to benefit big corporations? No. But are you just benefiting some big corporations at the expense of others? What do you mean by “real net neutrality?”
4. “We believe that no one should work full-time and still live in poverty, and that means raising the minimum wage.”
What if someone can’t get a full-time job, perhaps because of Obamacare? Do they get no help?
And how will an increase in the minimum wage help those who can’t get any job because of the minimum wage? How will this help teenagers or other young people get their first job?
The great progressive President Franklin Roosevelt intervened to keep wages high during the Great Depression. The result was that those who succeeded in keeping their jobs were even better off than before, while millions of others were thrown out of work and had nothing.
5. “We believe that fast-food workers deserve a livable wage, and that means that when they take to the picket line, we are proud to fight alongside them.”
Hm. How are you “fighting alongside them” other than giving speeches? Are you fighting for the workers or for the unions? And how much money have you received from unions?
6. “We believe that students are entitled to get an education without being crushed by debt.”
Yes — and then what? Hasn’t the Federal student loan program driven up the cost of a college education, leaving many students worse off than before it existed?
And why is the Federal government borrowing at a low interest rate and then charging the students a much higher rate? How can it be right to make a profit off the students and then apply it to the Federal budget under a line called “deficit reduction.”
7. “We believe that after a lifetime of work, people are entitled to retire with dignity, and that means protecting Social Security, Medicare and pensions.”
How exactly will we do that? Should we keep borrowing from the Chinese in order to “protect” these programs? What kind of protection is that?
8. “We believe — I can’t believe I have to say this in 2014 — we believe in equal pay for equal work.”
Are progressives the only people you think believe in this?
9. “We believe that equal means equal, and that’s true in marriage, it’s true in the workplace, it’s true in all of America.”
Except in Federal programs that discriminate in favor of one group over another? If equal is equal, then why are non-unionized companies barred from Federal construction contracts? Other examples could fill the page.
10. “We believe that immigration has made this country strong and vibrant, and that means reform.”
It may “mean reform,” but what does “reform” mean? This is evasive.
11. “And we believe that corporations are not people, that women have a right to their bodies. We will overturn Hobby Lobby and we will fight for it. We will fight for it!”
If corporations are not people, is it OK for the Federal government to gag their speech, tell them what they must say or not say, and otherwise deny them any of the protections offered by the bill of rights?
Having recited what Warren believes to be the 11 tenets of contemporary progressivism, what does she think that conservatives believe? Here it is: “I got mine. The rest of you are on your own.”
But is this what conservatives teach? Is this even what markets teach? Do they teach us to be selfish? Or do they teach us that we had better put our selfishness aside and tend to the needs of customers and employees first if we want to be successful?
People who run businesses are serving the needs of others. And people who work for the government may be just as selfish as anybody else.
Did Warren describe all the tenets of contemporary progressivism? No, she described the ones she wanted to describe. But let’s leave it for now with her 11.

http://personalliberty.com/senator-e...progressivism/