Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #11
    Senior Member Daculling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by crazybird
    I just figured with tax incentives and such big profits they would re-invest in the company to keep prices affordable instead of taking the money and running with it.
    Well, the corporations are beholden to the stockholders. That being said... finding and producing more oil is becoming increasing expensive and the costs are passed on to you. It's easy to eat bread when you have a loaf but a lot tougher when you spend your time looking for the crumbs. They do invest an enormous amount of money on discovery... I wound not invest in a company with depleting reserves.

  2. #12
    EnuffzEnuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    119
    the word is only 30% of these profits were made off of the USA. So use this as a sort of model and look at what a bunch of gas hawgs we all are

  3. #13
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168
    When did the $2 profit per barrel of crude oil get removed? Wasnt it not long after Bush entered the White House?
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •