Thread: Gun Owners Not Welcome on Obama's White House Team?

Originally Posted by Hylander_1314

I like the Patrick Henry put it, "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!"

We need more Patrick Henrys.

there are 80 Million PLUS Patrick Henrys armed to the teeth in America ...

While listening to Gun Talk on the radio last week they said that on Nobama's transition web site his objectives were outlined. While listeners were busy going to the trasition site to view, the site was taken down, the host then posted and told listeners how to find what was there. tinyurl.com/5gznwl.

On the transition site outline was the plans for a permanent ban on assault weapons, child proofing guns, police depts would be exempt from this, and make possible to sue manufactures out of business, and to shut down gun shows.

Rahm Emanuel was Clinton's point man on gun control during the Clinton adminstration.

GunTalk.com for those that maybe interested. Gun Talk is weekly show on Sundays 8pm est

You think that will weed out Hillary Clinton? Wasn't she boasting about being some kind of Annie Oakley when she was stumping for President?

Maybe they will demand the Secret Service that protects them all not carry guns too?

What part of "and this right shall not be infringed" do they not understand. I believe our forefathers anticipated an attack on weapons and that is why the posted the warning. What they didn't count on is the total denial that this is in the constitution at all.

Perhaps a little networking might be of help. If anyone visits gun rights sites they could invite people to vist this site and post and comment concerning gun laws, thus taking back info concerning this site and illegal immigration.

It seems to me that both go hand in hand, as many immigrants, legal or not come from countries that do not allow citizens to own firearms. Thus that lack of knowledge on their part helps to corode our 2nd Amendment.

Originally Posted by cayla99

What part of "and this right shall not be infringed" do they not understand. I believe our forefathers anticipated an attack on weapons and that is why the posted the warning. What they didn't count on is the total denial that this is in the constitution at all.

You also have to wonder if this may be some kind of discrimination on the part of an employeer? The Constitution give us th eright to own firearms. They are doing nothing illegal, so why are they being discriminated against. Sure woudl be interesting to see an attorney get ahold of this one.

I will NEVER forget what happened in Waco or Ruby Ridge and it scared the H out of me.

But the government gets away with it on the grounds of this article I posted here:

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-138498.html