Thread: Has The US Supreme Court No Shame?

Has The US Supreme Court No Shame?
By Devvy

12-15-8

Shame: the painful feeling arising from the consciousness of something dishonorable, improper, ridiculous, etc., done by oneself or another;.disgrace; ignominy

Today, and for the second time, the U.S. Supreme Court shirked its duty and responsibility to hear a case that has direct bearing on whether Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham, is a legitimate candidate to be America's next president. Without question, should the U.S. Supreme Court have ruled Obama ineligible to qualify as a candidate for the presidency, it would have created an unprecedented upheaval, but we the people have the right to a legitimate president no matter the pain of completing the process. The Founding Fathers and colonials gave their honor, their money and their blood as principled individuals. They stood their ground and so shall we the people despite the cowardly path chosen by these justices.

The stonewalling by Obama and his legal legions in Obama's refusal to respond to the allegations that he does not meet constitutional requirements for citizenship redefines hubris. One can imagine his joy today when the order was posted that the U.S. Supreme Court again spit on the U.S. Constitution for political expediency and out of sheer cowardice. There can be no other explanation for the court refusing to hear the Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski cases.

As Leo said in a recent post on his web site, it doesn't matter what the cell damaged media lap dogs say about these cases. What matters is the supreme law of the land. Today's DENIED by the "high" court makes it perfectly clear that those nine justices don't have the guts to take on such a huge decision. Never mind the million plus letters that were sent to the court by Americans who demand the supreme law of the land be upheld. Never mind the pompous blathering by politicos on web sites who care nothing for the U.S. Constitution. The one and only question was and still remains: Was Barack Hussein Obama a natural born citizen at birth?

There are still a number of cases on going. The electoral college delegates meet at all 50 state capitols today to vote for this impostor. What happens next will depend on what these electors do during the vote. Further updates will follow.

There has been so much disinformation and distortions about all the cases relating to this issue on the Internet. Having read a great deal of the blarney out there by bloggers, TV and radio talk show hosts and columnists who support Obama, I can tell you 99.999% of them never read a single word in any of the briefs submitted to the Supreme Court. Their own words condemn them as either intellectually lazy or simply ignorant.

Emotions have run high over this controversy which all could have been avoided had Obama simply come clean about his citizenship. Instead, this impostor has chosen to commit a fraud against the American people that, should he be sworn in, will simply prolong the inevitable. Obama is going down, it's just a matter of time. If sworn in, he will begin his presidency the same as the famous Clinton duo: drowning in controversy and rage from Americans who still believe in the supreme law of the land.

I fully understand time is an issue for Americans. However, to really understand how serious the question is regarding Obama's eligibility, one must take the time to at least read some of the most factual information available. If Obama could have proven his citizenship, he would have done so many, many months ago. He's bluffing we the people will simply go away and allow him to be sworn in as Impostor in Chief. That isn't going to happen.

In an effort to make things easier and because I'm not certain how long Leo will leave his web site up and running, I have put several documents into the audio section of my web site. You can listen via the computer, download to a CD and listen on the road, in commute traffic, on a train or plane. Share these recordings with friends, family and those who still believe we are a nation of laws, not lies. These recording include Leo's submission to the U.S. Supreme Court, Cort's submission and additional filing with the court, some of the material from Leo's site (with his permission) and a critically important column from Dr. Edwin Vieira on what will happen should Obama get sworn into office.


Those recordings can be found here:

http://www.devvy.net/audio/dec08/rense/ ... ntary.html

Dr. Edwin Vieira's column is in the link above. You can read the full text of his column here:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin186.htm

The reason Edwin's column is so important is because lays out what will happen if Obama signs another unconstitutional "hate crime" law or anti-Second Amendment law. The defendant in the case can then go after Obama as his defense. Edwin also details how one member of the House of Representatives and one member of the Senate can challenge the electoral college votes.

This case is absolutely germane to the issue and part of it (to read the entire decision would have taken a couple of hours) is in the new audio section cited above.
U.S. v. WONG KIM ARK, 169 U.S. 649 (189


UNITED STATES
v.
WONG KIM ARK.
No. 132.
March 28, 1898


The full text may be read here:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/g ... &invol=649


Leo Donofrio's web site is:

http://www.blogtext.org/naturalborncitizen/

and:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/


Phil Berg's web site is:

http://www.obamacrimes.com/


Dr. Orly Taitz's web site is:

http://www.drorly.blogspot.com/


United States Justice Foundation:

http://www.usjf.net/


WND has a current and very well done news item on this issue:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=83693

http://www.rense.com/general84/has.htm

The US Supreme Court again spit on the U.S. Constitution for political expediency and out of sheer cowardice.

I have lost all respect for the Supreme Court and for all the elected politicians who stood around twiddling their thumbs while this mockery of the US Constitution took place. This shows that the high court is a bunch of gangsters just like the rest of them. They should all be jailed for not honoring their pledges to uphold the Constitution.

Alan Keyes' case has the best change of being heard. I say that because he is a candidate that would have be harmed by any fraud perpatrated by Obama.

Frankly, I don't know why any citizen can't challenge Obama's eligibility.

Dixie

Why cant we have some gutsy and honest judges, the supreme court was taken over by elitist sympasizers long ago.

Originally Posted by USA_born

The US Supreme Court again spit on the U.S. Constitution for political expediency and out of sheer cowardice.

I have lost all respect for the Supreme Court and for all the elected politicians who stood around twiddling their thumbs while this mockery of the US Constitution took place. This shows that the high court is a bunch of gangsters just like the rest of them. They should all be jailed for not honoring their pledges to uphold the Constitution.

********

I 'm sorry to say this, but the Supreme Court's silence on this Obama eligibility birth certificate mess is really sad.

1. Here we are, the American public, crawling on our hands and knees begging the Supreme Court to please, please do something about this Obama eligibility mess, but the Supreme Court---for some unknown reason--- is completely, utterly silent on the issue, as if it didn't care what happened to the United States in the next four years during the first term of the mysterious ghost President Obama.

2. I mean, how hard is it for the Supreme Court to tell Obama to simply produce his long form Hawaii birth certificate---the one with the doctor and Hawaii birth hospital names on it---in order to prove that he is eligible to be president under the laws of the U.S. Constitution?

3. Doesn't the Supreme Court realize that when it looks around, it has no legal document in hand that proves that Obama was born in Hawaii?

4. Doesn't the Supreme Court realize that no state---outside of Hawaii---has ever seen Obama's long form birth certificate, the one with the doctor and Hawaii birth hospital names on it?

5. My God, Supreme Court. The least you could do is hear oral arguments as to why Obama is fighting so hard NOT to produce his Hawaii long form birth certificate---the one with doctor and Hawaii birth hospital names on it---in order to prove that he, Obama, is eligible to be president under the laws of the Constitution of the United States.

6. NOTE to the Supreme Court: Doesn't it bother you that not a single Hawaii hospital has come out publicly and announced that Obama was born there, if, as Obama claims, he was born in a hospital in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961?