Thread: How climate change may be worsening Huricane Sandy

RELATED

http://www.alipac.us/f19/why-republi...change-266212/

RELATED

http://www.alipac.us/f19/climate-cos...rstorm-266238/

NYT called out city’s flood-protection problems in September

By Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News | The Lookout – 2 hrs 55 mins ago

In a prescient New York Times article in September, scientists warned that New York City could become paralyzed for a month or more if a storm—or rising sea levels caused by climate change—caused significant flooding.

This passage, flagged by Reuters' Felix Salmon, stands out in particular:

Consolidated Edison, the utility that supplies electricity to most of the city, estimates that adaptations like installing submersible switches and moving high-voltage transformers above ground level would cost at least $250 million. Lacking the means, it is making gradual adjustments, with about $24 million spent in flood zones since 2007.

Scientists have been saying for years that the city is at risk due to rising sea levels.

Currently, 250,000 ConEd customers in lower Manhattan are without power, and city officials say it could take several more days for it to be restored. The utility company's transformers at a facility on 14th Street exploded during the storm surge Monday night, raising the question of whether this $250 million investment would have prevented that from happening.

At a news conference on Monday, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg questioned the feasibility of another suggestion from scientists and experts in that article: that the city build gates to shut off subway tubes when water rises. Currently, the city's subway system is expected to be down for at least the week.

"I don't know how practical it is to put gates on PATH tubes and subway tunnels," Bloomberg said.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo told reporters Tuesday that the city needs to rebuild with what he called new, more severe weather patterns in mind. "It is something we're going to have to start thinking about. ... The construction of this city did not anticipate these kinds of situations. We are only a few feet above sea level," Cuomo said.

NYT called out city

“Frankenstorm” and creating monsters

By Mindy Lubber
October 31, 2012

SaveIt’s déjà vu all over again: a huge chunk of the nation is reeling from extreme weather – in this case, the devastation wrought by Hurricane Sandy, the so-called “Frankenstorm.”

Scientists tell us you can’t blame any one weather event on climate change. But they do say warmer water energizes tropical storms like Sandy. And they say a warming world puts more moisture in the atmosphere, which tends to bring greater rainfall totals when heavy weather strikes. And they point out that storm surges like the ones we’ve seen this week do more damage when sea levels are already elevated before the storm strikes.

Keep in mind that all three of these climate-related trends — rising sea surface temperatures, global average temperatures, and sea levels — are all expected to continue because of climate change.
Now consider what that means for the insurance industry, and the families and businesses across America who rely on insurance as a bulwark against financial ruin. Consider that weather disasters in 2011 alone led to $32 billion in insured losses in the United States.

And consider that those losses included historic heat, widespread drought and wildfires, and Mississippi flooding — all of which, scientists say, are previews of disasters likely to become more common in a warming world.

At Ceres, we believe insurance companies and regulators would be foolish to ignore the truth: As the Earth heats up, the odds of severe weather events increase, and the risks of covering vulnerable communities rise, as well. The abnormal is becoming the new normal, and the insurance industry needs to face facts.

Our new report, “Stormy Future for US Property and Casualty Insurers: The Growing Costs and Risks of Extreme Weather Events,” lays out a plan of action for insurance companies, regulators and investors to deal with the increasing risks.

And it shows how the insurance sector can actually help our country adapt to climate change, and help the world curb the worst effects of global warming.

The report calls for insurance companies to keep up with the science, take climate trends into account, and evaluate and price risks accordingly. It calls for regulators to follow the lead of insurance commissioners in New York, California and Washington State, who require major insurance companies to disclose their exposure to climate-related risks.

And it advises investors and ratings agencies to keep climate risks in mind when assessing insurance companies’ financial strength.

Beyond facing up to the realities of a changing climate, America’s insurance sector can play an important role in helping the nation adapt.

There is plenty of precedent. For example, by making insurance contingent on building standards, insurance companies have helped minimize the damage from fires and earthquakes. And by offering cheaper rates for cars equipped with air bags and other safety features, insurers have encouraged automobile safety.

In a similar way, the report says, standards for insurability and insurance rate incentives for smart building can help steer land-use planning decisions, infrastructure design, and building codes in ways that makes communities less vulnerable to disaster and more resilient when catastrophe strikes.

Insurers can also get a better handle on their climate change exposure by supporting research into national and regional forecasting of severe weather patterns.

They can even offer products and services that incentivize clean, efficient energy, in order to lessen the burning of fossil fuels and address the root cause of climate change.

Leading insurers and re-insurers are already addressing their risk from a changing climate and increasing severe weather. The rest of the insurance sector should follow suit.

A clear-eyed look at the risks inherent in a warming world — and at what can be done to mitigate those risks — makes for a stronger insurance industry, a more resilient economy, and a better-prepared region and nation.

“Frankenstorm” and creating monsters - Opinion - The Boston Globe