Thread: How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11

Even Anwar al-Awlaki, the hijackers’ spiritual adviser, escaped our grasp. In 2002, the Saudi-sponsored cleric was detained at JFK on passport fraud charges only to be released into the custody of a “Saudi representative.”

Wow - Awlaki was a major player, a Bin Laden relative on the terror list & others, let go!

Bush/Cheyney wanted to war with Iraq and PERMITTING 911 gave them the excuse - even though they were very aware of who was behind 911.

The years of Iraq brought fortunes to military suppliers, Cheyney's Haliburton especially. Rotten creeps do not care at all the sufferings thru death and disablement they brought to Americans.

Scumbag Bandar - don't these Saudis have anything better to do with their fortunes? They are all screwy and the continuation of their backwards treatment of women attests to that. We should not deal with them at all. No buying of USA land etc.

“No stronger retrograde force exists in the world,” Churchill concluded.

Islamic law moves the world backwards, Churchill said —

These 16 States Have Introduced Legislation Banning Shariah Law

Shariah law is a society-killer. The implementation methods have varied throughout history — sometimes Shariah is set in place upon an Islamic takeover of a nation, or there can be an arduous assimilation process that takes place over generations. Thankfully, several states have rallied against this deplorable set of rules, ultimately revitalizing the grand nature of the United States Constitution. And, unlike the U.S. Constitution, there is no fairness, no justice and no decency for those under the wrath of Shariah Law.

Muslim women aren’t respected, nor do they have basic human rights under Shariah law. They must wear oppressive clothing, they often cannot drive vehicles, and their husbands can beat them for simple insubordination.

There is little justice in the Shariah court system, as life is simply not respected. If you criticize or deny the deity of Allah, the doctrine of the Quran or the identity of Muhammad as the Prophet, your punishment would equate to a gruesome death.

That being said, here are the states that have protected themselves from the brutality of Islamic law, according to The Political Insider:

• Alabama (two bills)
• Arkansas
• Florida (two bills)
• Indiana (two bills)
• Iowa
• Kentucky
• Mississippi (four bills)
• Missouri (two bills)
• North Carolina
• Oklahoma (seven bills)
• South Carolina (two bills)
• Texas (six bills)
• Virginia
• Washington
• West Virginia
• Wyoming (two bills)

In light of radical Islamic terror attacks, hopefully more states will continue to populate this rather short list.

As the great Winston Churchill said about Shariah, or “Mohammedan,” law:
“The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property — either as a child, a wife, or a concubine — must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: All know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

“No stronger retrograde force exists in the world,” Churchill concluded.

Islamic law moves the world backwards, Churchill said — is your state moving forward?

http://conservativetribune.com/banni...ent=2016-04-16