Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
12-20-2006, 01:14 AM #1
(UK) Stewardess banned from carrying Bible
A second airline is embroiled in a religious row after a stewardess decided to take bmi to an employment tribunal because it refused to allow her to carry a Bible on flights to Saudi Arabia.
The stewardess, who has not been named, claims that she has been subject to discrimination because of her faith.
She is understood to have deep religious convictions and carries a Bible with her at all times.
But bmi, which is the only British scheduled carrier to fly to the country after British Airways pulled out of the route, insisted that it was only following Foreign Office advice.
The dispute has erupted as British Airways seeks to settle its own dispute with Nadia Eweida, a Heathrow check-in worker, who has been banned from wearing a cross on a necklace while on duty.
A spokesman for bmi said the airline was complying with Saudi law and added that the stewardess had been offered the opportunity to switch to working on its short-haul routes. It could not, however, alter its long-haul rosters to accommodate her.
The Foreign Office website informs travellers to Saudi Arabia: "The importation and use of narcotics, alcohol, pork products and religious books, apart from the Koran, and artefacts are forbidden."
A spokesman said last night that the Saudi authorities would automatically confiscate a Bible from anybody trying to bring one into the country and it would not be returned.
A spokesman for Christian Solidarity Worldwide said: "It is worrying that a British company should be instructing its staff to conform to practices which are in violation of international standards on religious freedom.
"The Saudi government prohibits the public practice of other religions and the possession of non-Islamic religious objects has often led to arrests."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... ible20.xml[b]Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.
- Arnold J. Toynbee
-
12-20-2006, 03:30 AM #2
Wonder how it would go over with ALL Islamic folks here, if we started having the very same rules that their native countries had, however, in reverse to that, only Christian texts and icons would be allowed in this country, and no others?????............
Bet these people would all be screaming foul at us. No different than Mexicos immigration policies, and then trying to tell us how we should be handling ours. Total hypocrisy, both groups, the OBL people and the Latino governments, as well as the Islamic extremists and their governments."In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot." Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
12-20-2006, 01:32 PM #3Originally Posted by AmericanElizabethI stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)
-
12-20-2006, 04:49 PM #4
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 938
Originally Posted by AmericanElizabeth
-
12-21-2006, 01:00 AM #5
The UK and the EU itself both have huge numbers of illegal immigrants from North Africa. Don't be surprised to see more and more legal issues settled in a religious neutral way. I saw a program a few months back on the Discovery Channel that covered immigration in the United Kingdom. In 30 years it is predicted England will have more citizens that do not have English blood in them than do have it. And that affects policy.
Long Beach Declares Public Health Emergency Due to ‘Surprising’...
05-04-2024, 07:58 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports