Thread: HR 45?

I can only find small details but it was on Lou Dobbs.

Sorry if it's in the wrong place

H.R.45
Title: To provide for the implementation of a system of licensing for purchasers of certain firearms and for a record of sale system for those firearms, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Rush, Bobby L. [IL-1] (introduced 1/6/2009) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: 2/9/2009 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.


I moved this to other topics.

Go to www.thomas.gov and look up Bill number for more details.

Dixie

Thank you. I just did more searching and found this...

http://www.standupamericausa.com/?p=1857

Originally Posted by StarwalkerFallenAngel

Thank you. I just did more searching and found this...

http://www.standupamericausa.com/?p=1857

Text of item at link:


Home Advertisers Contact Us Premier Membership Store
House Bill ‘HR 45′
Posted by Editor on Feb 5th, 2009
From the Editor



Are you ready for the House Bill titled ‘HR 45, Blair Holt Licensing and Record Act of 2009′. It will make it illegal to own a firearm unless it is registered with the database in Washington D.C. As a gun owner you will have to be finger printed, you will be required to provide your DL#, SS#, you must maintain a valid address at all times, submit to mental and physical health records being put on file, you will also be required to file any address changes and any ownership changes even if private sale. Each update will cost $25 and if you fail to comply you will lose your right to own firearms. This bill and its language mirror almost completely one defeated last year in the House of Representatives by soon to be Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Will the citizenry be as lucky this time?



Pass this on to everyone who believes in strict Constitutionalism and remember that laws only apply to those who obey them. Criminals by definition and nature do not abide by laws. New laws and restrictions only apply to the law abiding citizen and are not written with the criminal in mind. With guns, it is not about having laws on the books to prosecute individuals, it is about taking guns away from the people so that no one has them in the first place. One last item to note, when assuming power and creating a facist state, Hitler was a proponent of strong gun laws because a disarmed populace was much easier to control than an armed one. The Kings of old also outlawed weapons of any kind in any region that they conquered to quell the ability of the citizens to uprise against them.



The Founding Fathers of this Nation understood all of the above and because of this they included the Second Amendment in the Constitution. In fact, they knew that at some point in every society’s life span that the need for the population to arise came about. To this end they made the right to keep and bear arms against a tyrannical state an absolute right that could not be revoked. They did this because the first thing tyrants and despots do is to remove a populations right to defend themselves. When this is done the tyrants have no problem with the destruction of society as we know it





That's right......laws only do apply to those who obey them, now don't they

By no means do I condone breaking the law, and I am NOT suggesting, or encouraging it, but just how do they propose to enforce such laws if the majority of people simply do not comply?

A good, valid point!