Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Income Taxes Are Not For Income To The Federal Government

    Income Taxes Are Not For Income To The Federal Government

    December 20, 2010
    by Bob Livingston

    Before we get entangled in the doublespeak of the Internal Revenue Service Code and rulings, we need to consider that the whole Orwellian nightmare is a sham imposed by the police power of the State on a gullible people.

    Actually the income tax has a dual purpose, and neither is to pay taxes to the government. Its first purpose is to control and redistribute the volume of money. James A. Garfield, the 20th President of the United States said, “Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Depreciating paper money is not a store of wealth. Gold and silver are. One can bury paper money and the money creators and tax collectors do not know where it is. Yet the State can steal the purchasing power of paper money by creating more paper money and diluting the buried paper money.
    So while money is in your possession, in your billfold, the government is stealing a piece of it each and every day. You are being pick-pocketed by your government.

    However, the article also says that due to this clandestine theft, that the federal government does not need tax monies as the theft should be enough to cover costs of operating the federal government. If this was the case inflation would have to be somewhere around 20%(?) or more, as the annual rate of inflation being calculated at 3.5% or perhaps 5% would not be enough to keep Leviathan in the accustomed manner befitting a tyrant.

    Also the article by Mr. Ruml seems to point the finger of blame at the federal government while at the same time advocating for social policies supported by a fiat currency. He argues for taxation as a means for redistribution of wealth, yet blames government for inflationary theft. Seems like to many contradictions to be merely coincidental.

    A smaller federal government is needed, yet the house of cards grows ever larger.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •