Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Talker warns justices could agree that 'Obamacare' unconstit

    MEDIA MATTERS

    WorldNetDaily

    Radio rant: Supremes may call Obama N-word

    Talker warns justices could agree that 'Obamacare' unconstitutional --WND

    Posted: March 24, 2010
    8:02 pm Eastern

    © 2010 WorldNetDaily

    A left-leaning radio talk show host has suggested the U.S. Supreme Court justices are so racist they would stoop to calling President Obama the N-word.

    The statement by Norman Goldman, guest-hosting the Ed Schultz Show, was captured by Brian Maloney, the Radio Equalizer. http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2010 ... -call.html

    Libtalker - Racist Supreme Court Justices 'Might Call Obama The N-Word'

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCXEZiO2 ... r_embedded

    Goldman said the best argument from opponents of health-care reform is that the mandate to buy insurance is unconstitutional, because "regulating interstate commerce" does not mean forcing people to do business with private companies.

    "That's their best argument, and they may win. Because five members of the Supreme Court don't like Mr. Obama. And they'd be happy to rub his nose in the mud," said Goldman.

    "They might even call him the N-word. You never know."

    Obama signed into law his health-care reform bill yesterday. It essentially nationalizes health care by mandating consumer purchases of government-approved policies and extending coverage to other groups of people. It creates penalties for citizens who don't have "adequate" insurance policies, as determined by the government.

    Its thousands of pages also usurp the right of private banks to make student loans, and other features that have yet to be fully explained.

    Schultz' website described Goldman as "progressive."

    Maloney commented: "Here's a question for any talk host taking time off: who's minding the store? Available fill-in talent often ranges from boring and unlistenable to dangerously over-the-top. Ed Schultz's regular sub, Norman Goldman, is in the latter camp, often sounding simply deranged and mean-spirited.

    "Goldman, who hosts his own program in addition to serving as Ed's primary relief, parrots the latter's mannerisms right down to the Sylvester the Cat-like vocal style. But the rhetoric may even surpass his mentor's," said Maloney.

    "This passage, however, may actually win the prize for hate-mongering as Goldman wonders aloud whether a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court would call Obama the N-word," he said.

    "As Goldman is better connected to the left than some might suspect, is he revealing his party's next strategy, a concentrated campaign of harassment against U.S. Supreme Court justices?" Maloney wondered.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=131549
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Justthatguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    735
    The so-called Supreme Court is just nine hack politicians in black robes talking about what goes on inside their heads. Just recently they voted to allowed corporations that right to make unlimited contributions to political candidates. Even though there's no mention of corporations in the Constitution the fact is they don't have constitutional rights period. Only people have basic human rights. In other words they are making decisions based on their opinions and not law, logic or anything else that makes sense.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •