Thread: Jews Lead Gun Control Charge - YouTube

Forced Fluoridation of The Jewish People Again~

Adding fluoride has been [intended as a measure] to improve the health of the teeth but opposition has been arising due to a fear that fluoride is likely to damage the teeth and even to cause cancer. Now the committee is recommending that fluoridation be stopped until the matter has been appropriately researched. In the meantime, every municipality will decide independently whether or not to fluoridate.

Four years after the Health Ministry decided to add fluoride to Israel’s drinking water in order to reduce dental caries, a special committee is recommending that the Ministry cease water fluoridation. The reason: not a single definitive study demonstrates that the process has any benefit for dental health.

On the contrary, other existing research demonstrates that adding fluoride might even be harmful. It has become known to “Yediot Achronot” that the [committee’s] recommendation will be passed on to the Health Ministry in the next few weeks.

Adding fluoride to Israel’s water systems began in the early 80’s in Gush Dan and about four years ago a regulation came into effect requiring all municipal authorities to add fluoride to the drinking water for the purpose of improving dental health.

However, in the Knesset [Israeli Parliament] the regulation blew up a storm already then. Beyond the social protest against enforcing water fluoridation on the entire populace, points were also raised about harm to health and the environment. Opponents of fluoridation, likewise, introduced research studies that show that adding fluoride not only doesn’t reduce dental cavities. It also may cause damage to the teeth and bones. It has been further found that in high concentrations this substance may cause cancer.

On the other hand, the proponents [of fluoridation] state that there is no absolute proof of damage to the health and that, in any case, there is no risk of danger at the low level at which it is added. In any case, even though the regulation came into effect in 2002 not all local authorities have complied. Currently about 65% of the population are drinking fluoridated water.

One year after the regulation came into effect the subject of fluoridation became one of the most contentious issues in the committee, headed by Professor Avner Adin, for up-dating drinking water standards. Preliminary conclusions presented by the Adin committee determined that the research studies presented to his committee were either contradictory or of mediocre quality at best. For instance, some of the studies showed a rise in the percentage of children not in need of dental fillings in the areas in which fluoride was being added to the water while other studies showed no difference in the rate of decrease in caries between countries which fluoridate and those which do not. In a interim decision the committee determined that, until a comprehensive study to look into the effects of fluoridation, is carried out in Israel, there is no room to stop fluoridation. But such a study is likely to take about five years and in a heated debate that took place two days ago within the committee, a contrary decision was taken by a majority of one vote.

According to Professor Adin it has been decided that the committee will recommend removing the requirement to add fluoride to the water and that every municipal authority will be permitted to make its own decision. The committee’s decision will be in effect until the conclusion of the comprehensive study and the decision as to what action to take in the future will be made of the basis of its findings. It is assumed that adoption of this recommendation will result in most local authorities ceasing to add fluoride to the drinking water for the time being.

“ADDING FLUORIDE REDUCES CARIES,”
says Professor Chaim Tal, in favor of adding fluoride.

Adding fluoride to drinking water substantially reduces the number of dental caries, asserts Professor Chaim Tal, head of the School of Dentistry at Tel Aviv University. Two Israeli studies have found lower cavity levels in children aged 5-12 in fluoridated areas as compared with [children of the same age] in non-fluoridated areas. One of the studies found that the level of caries was 24% higher in the non-fluoridated areas than in those where fluoride was being added. The gap between the poisonous level of fluoridated water and the therapeutic level at which fluoride is added, is very great. Therefore, there is no danger from routine utilization with all acceptable methods in practice today.

Fluoridation of drinking water is the most efficient and best proven measure for lowering dental caries in the world at large and in developing countries where dental caries are high as in Israel in particular. As dental care is not included in the national health insurance package, fluoridating drinking water is essential.

“FLUORIDE MAY CAUSE CANCER,”
states Shimon Tsuk, opposed to adding fluoride

We are now at a point where there is an excess of fluoride in the environment. Even if fluoride is effective in preventing cavities we must discontinue adding it to our drinking water in order to avoid poisoning, states Shimon Tsuk, hydrologist at the Israel Union for Environmental Defense. A month ago the American Dental Association recommended that parents of infants up to one year old avoid using fluoridated water when preparing baby formulas. There is evidence that infants absorb large quantities [of fluoride] into their systems and this effects teeth and bones, says Mr. Tsuk.

Where the fluoride level in water is high one can observe white spots on people’s teeth and where the level is very high yellow or brown spots occur. Fluoride is absorbed into the bones and a recent American study found a correlation between children who developed bone cancer and also were drinking fluoridated water during childhood. In Europe dental health care is included in the national health care programs, whereas in Israel it is not. This is one of the justifications which government health care officials give for adding this dangerous substance to the water.

__________________________________________________ ___________________

Fluoridation Suit Filed in Israel

Israel requires all water districts serving at least 5,000 users to fluoridate. Suit has been filed against the practice of fluoridation. Follow this link:

http://www.emetaheret.org.il/2012/11/12/בגץ-פלואוריד-הפלרה/

Here is the Google translation:

Court first discuss the core issues of water fluoridation, including issues were previously Conspiracy Theory “such as the consent of the governments around the world pour into industrial byproducts of drinking water instead require polluting industries to plant and dispose of them safely.

Today, 12 November 2012, at 09:00 tribunal of Justice in Jerusalem
Jacob Gorman, Chairman of balancing returns and his attorney attorney Dan Ashkenazi and they wrote a legal petition
Requiring the State of Israel and head of the state health system, Health Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,
Immediately cancel the addition of acid Hfloorsilitzit (the fluoride) who drink of the citizens of the state.
Petition

Serving the petition – the “balance returns to” spreading health education in Israel, with attorney Dan Ashkenazi and Dikla Dan Burns from Ashkenazi Mcf”s, argues that adding industrial waste drinking water (or her full name – Acid Floaorosilitzit) severely affects the health of Israeli citizens and is thus forced medical treatment without consent, a crime under the laws of the State of Israel.

The petition has about 30 pages (not including the opinion) contains expert opinions water engineer Ehud there and a medical opinion from Dr. Arie blocks.

Two opinions and accurate data and information found petition the cast shadow
The mechanism of decision-making in the medical system, especially the Director General, Ministry of Health, Roni Gamzu and Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman

Two people who support water fluoridation stubborn, against many professional opinion, prevented the citizens of the State of Israel from getting clean drinking water with toxic chemicals, by-products of polluting industries.

The first sentence appears petition concludes my opinion the nature of the petition and the seriousness with which the balance Association refer back to the point:

“This petition deals with paternalistic government action without authority, which forced respondents to residents of the State of Israel to put their bodies chemical, fluoride, by adding those drinking piped into homes.

As detailed in the body of this petition, the material it requires respondents to state water suppliers add those drinking, is a toxic substance, dangerous, carrying hazardous materials information on fluoride itself, the manner of delivery does not allow any monitoring of the final result, it has serious side effects. ”

In a press release published by the Association balance back (attached as download and read at the bottom of the article) says the organization:

In Israel institutionalized state the process called “Fluoridation” in 2002 in the publication of Regulation teacher every locality larger than 5000 residents Hfloaorosilitzit add the acid to drinking water. The source of the acid, (which is basically industrial waste) by 2009 was from fertilizers and chemicals, which sold it to residents of the state water providers, such as Mekorot and private water associations.
Following public pressure, the distribution of network information, and protests, chemicals and fertilizers has decided to stop providing the acid, wanting to spend itself this negative spotlight. Since 2009, the state buys Hfloaorosilitzit acid and phosphates fertilizers plants in Spain and China.

We asked if he believes there is a chance for the petition said Jacob, “we assume today address very clear on the wall in front of the Ministry of Health, Health Minister and Deputy Minister of Health. Acid Hfloaorosilitzit is toxic industrial waste and no right and permission to stream it our waters.”
This is not the first time

This petition is the first petition filed in the High Court against the State of Israel and to nullify the addition of fluoride to those who drink.

In 2002 (HCJ 4529/02) The first petition was filed by the Local Government Center, Herzliya municipality and the Israel Union for Environmental Defense against the State of Israel and the Ministry of Health
With petitioners demanded immediate halt to water fluoridation acid Floorsilitzit.

This petition was filed after the then health minister’s call ignored Committee chairman, Labor, Welfare and Health Committee “to consider the suspension of the regulations, or cancellation, or postponement for a period of one year to re-examine this issue.”

Supreme Court advised the petitioners to withdraw their petition to allow the Ministry of Health to examine the issue further.

In 2003, a committee established by the Ministry of Health, headed by Prof. Avner Adin.

After two years of sitting on the pot, the committee submitted its recommendations in March 2005.

Among the recommendations – the repeal of compulsory fluoridation.

Also immediately rejected this recommendation on the – by then Health Minister CEO.
Banana Republic

A few months ago a brave attempt to pass a law in the Knesset that would prevent the addition of acid Hflorsilitzit those of our drinking water.

As someone who was in a Knesset debate on the bill initiated by the waves and flame,
I saw with my own eyes the conduct of Members of Knesset and especially the arrogant paternalism Health Ministry Director Ronnie Gamzu and other representatives of the Ministry of Health.

Despite the unwavering support of 57 Members of Knesset bill to cancel fluoridation, despite the opposition of the professional bodies,
Although medical opinion, including the opinion of the Nobel Prize winner, continued CEO Health Minister and Deputy Minister of Health
To retain the altar of stupidity I set only colonialism egotistical.

They treat us as stupid and ignorant natives who know what is good for them and so they allow themselves to decide for us,
Despite widespread opposition, what would be the water that we drink.

No more.

This step of filing a Supreme Court demonstrates that the responsibility for our lives we must demand and take.

I hope you’ll understand sitting ivory towers (Have you noticed the pun?) Of government
Who has the right to continue to introduce them to the drinking water of the people of Israel the most dangerous poisons,
And I hope that this time, unlike in the past, they did not ignore rulings, committee decisions, consulting experts – and above all, public resistance,
And do the right thing.

any guesses what their Religion is ... Anyone?

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo

Mayor Michael Rubens Bloomberg

Mayor Rahm Israel Emanuel

In mathematics, What is the lowest common denominator or least common denominator of the above


In mathematics, What is the lowest common denominator or least common denominator of the Below

Sen. Joe Liebermann

Sen. Dianne Feinstein

Sen. Chuck Shumer

Sen. Frank Lautenberg


I Smell Collusion

Collusion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Collusion is an agreement between two or more parties, sometimes illegal and therefore secretive, to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair advantage.^{[citation needed]} It is an agreement among firms or individuals to divide a market, set prices, limit production or limit opportunities.^[1] It can involve "wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between the colluding parties".^[2] In legal terms, all acts affected by collusion are considered void.^[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collusion

http://www.alipac.us/f19/theres-no-l...3/#post1329181

Assault weapons ban introduced in the Senate

Published: 24 January, 2013, 22:50
TAGS: Arms, Crime, Politics, Law, USA, Security

Senator Dianne Feinstein ,D-CA,walks from the lectern after speaking at a press conference on Capitol Hill January 24, 2013.(AFP PHOTO / Brendan Smialowski)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Thursday introduced a bill banning assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition clips, briefing members of Congress in front of a display featuring various deadly firearms that would be prohibited under the ban.

“Together we are introducing legislation to help end the mass shootings that have devastated countless families and terrorized communities,” Feinstein said in her opening remarks at a briefing on Capitol Hill.

The senator invited police officers, shooting victims and legislators to emphasize the need for her measure, which would resurrect a federal ban on assault weapons and more narrowly define them. As the speakers testified, they stood beside a large display of 10 different types of assault weapons, which are illegal in Washington, DC. Feinstein was required to get special permission to bring the deadly weapons into the US Capitol.

Combined with testimonies about gun violence and lost lives, Feinstein introduced her proposal. The new legislation would ban 158 specifically named firearms, as well as certain semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns that take a detachable magazine. It would also limit magazines to nine rounds of ammunition.

The measure would not affect owners who already possess such weapons and would not affect the sale of hunting, sporting, antique, manually operated and disabled weapons. But US residents who want to transfer their assault weapons to another person would not be able to legally do so unless the new owner commits to a background check.

“The purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons over time, therefore there is no sunset on this bill,” Feinstein said. The bill protects 2,200 specifically named hunting or sporting rifles, keeping them exempt from the rules of the legislation. The 1994 Assault Weapons Ban only protected 375 such weapons, which would cause US gun owners to have more options under the current proposal.

“This bill will be a signature moment in providing a profoundly significant step in the legislative strategy,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who joined forces with Feinstein in drafting the legislation. “But it is only a first step and we need to build on it with a comprehensive program” that includes expanded background checks and greater mental health care initiatives.

Senator Dianne Feinstein(R) ,D-CA, arrives for a press conference on Capitol Hill January 24, 2013 in Washington, DC. House and Senate Democrats where joined by law enforcement officials to introduce the "Assault Weapons Ban of 2013" legislation to ban assault style weapons and high capacity magazines.(AFP PHOTO / Brendan Smialowski)

The bill is likely to face harsh opposition from GOP lawmakers who have already pledged to oppose any new gun control regulations.

But an assault weapons ban has existed before, which gives the senator hope that it can exist again. Her proposal resembles a version of the assault-weapons ban that expired in 2004. Feinstein authored the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and has long pushed for bringing it back after it expired, but has faced immense opposition from congressional Republicans, many of whom believe the bill would diminish the Second Amendment right to own firearms.

The senator has been drafting this bill ever since the December massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School left 26 people dead, 20 of which were children. Feinstein’s legislation is aimed to prevent another such shooting by keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill and by limiting the sales of military-style assault weapons that can quickly massacre dozens of people. The US was host to 15 mass shootings in the year 2012, including the massacre of 12 people in a movie theater in Aurora, Colo., and the massacre of six people in a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis.

“I have worked on this for a long time,” Feinstein said in a USA Today interview. “I’m not a newcomer or a novice to guns.”

After family members of shooting victims displayed photographs of the loved ones they lost, Feinstein wrapped up the briefing with a strong urge to take action.

“Guns designed military use [are] bought all over this country and often used for mass murder. This is really an uphill road. If anyone asked today, ‘Can you win this?’ The answer is, ‘we don’t know,” Feinstein said.

“But only if you stand up, if America rises up, if people care enough to call every member of the House and every member of the Senate and say ‘we have had enough’” can this legislation be enacted, she added.

Feinstein to introduce the bill today in the Senate.

Assault weapons ban introduced in the Senate — RT

http://www.alipac.us/f9/why-mexico-a...2/#post1329197

Infowars Magazine

Just sent next month's issue off to print - NDAA, guns, illegal wiretapping and more.

Support our efforts to get the word out about liberty, buy a year subscription or get it in bulk! Infowars Magazine