Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,137

    John McCain's Internet

    U.S. House Will Vote Soon on Whether to Ditch John McCain's Internet
    Regulations

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org

    Wednesday, March 15, 2006


    The U.S. House of Representatives will vote, as early as Thursday, on
    legislation introduced by Texas Congressmen Jeb Hensarling and Ron
    Paul. This bill (H.R. 1606) will exempt the Internet from regulation
    under federal "electioneering" laws.

    Unless the Hensarling-Paul bill is successful, many major blogs and
    web sites could be shut down for 60 days before any general election
    -- and for 30 days prior to any primary -- making it much more
    difficult for groups like Gun Owners of America to criticize anti-gun
    candidates.

    How did we arrive at such a dismal state?

    You may remember that, a half-decade ago, Senator John McCain (R-AZ)
    pushed a McCain-Feingold bill which, as enacted, prohibits
    organizations from engaging in major "broadcast communications" which
    even mention a candidate in a favorable or unfavorable light within
    60 days of a general election (30 days of a primary).

    Senate Republicans rolled over -- and George Bush signed the bill --
    based on the assumption that the Supreme Court would surely save them
    from their unconstitutional legislation. But, in McConnell v.
    Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003), the Supreme Court,
    by a five-to-four decision, upheld McCain-Feingold, almost in its
    entirely.

    To its enormous credit, the conservative Federal Election Commission
    (FEC), in the wake of the McConnell case, moved to narrowly interpret
    the statute -- exempting the Internet entirely from McCain-Feingold.
    But in Shays v. Federal Election Commission, 337 F.Supp.2d 28 (D.C.,
    20004), a federal judge ordered the FEC to regulate the Internet.

    The FEC is doing everything in its power to minimize the impact of
    the Shays ruling.

    But, there is certainly a danger that, if Hensarling and Paul are
    unsuccessful in exempting the Internet from FEC regulation, many
    major blogs and web sites will be construed to be engaged in
    "electioneering communications" because they praise or criticize
    candidates. And, if this happens, they could be shut down for 60
    days prior to an election -- or, at least, subject to a "gag rule" on
    what they are allowed to say.

    ACTION: Contact your congressman. Ask him to vote for H.R. 1606, a
    bill to exempt the Internet from McCain-Feingold. Time is short, so
    please CALL rather than e-mail your representative. (You can use the
    sample text below to help direct your comments.) The toll-free
    number to call your representative is 877-762-8762. If you can't
    get through, the Capitol Switchboard number is 202-225-3121.

    ----- Sample phone text -----

    The U.S. House of Representatives will soon vote on H.R. 1606, a bill
    by introduced by Texas Congressmen Jeb Hensarling and Ron Paul to
    exempt the Internet from regulation under federal "electioneering"
    laws.

    Unless the Hensarling-Paul bill is successful, many major blogs and
    web sites could be shut down for 60 days before any general election
    -- and for 30 days prior to any primary.

    Please support H.R. 1606.
    Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God

  2. #2
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168
    They will try anything to control we the slaves.
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    was Georgia - now Arizona
    Posts
    4,477
    I called my Congressman.







  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    239
    This campaign finance crap needs to go back to the supreme court. it only passed by 1 vote .

    Additionally, we could charge McCain with violating his own act, at the same time.

    That way it's a win-win, with two outcomes.


    1. C.F. Reform is struck down as unconstitutional. McCain stays out of jail, but his life's work is thrown in the trash, hopefully taking his presidential hopes with it.


    2. CF Reform is upheld. We lose that, but we get to send McCain to a small cage.

    The Supreme Court, even with 2 Bush appointees , affirms that they are just a band of terrorists in black robes. We will finally know if any important issue can be trusted to them, ever.


    -pa

  5. #5
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168
    If they do not pass H.R. 1606, I will start at least ten more sites. I hope that everyone here will do the same. I will not let my voice go unnoticed. As an individual, I will not be censored.
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •