Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member grandmasmad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Henderson, NV.. formally of So Calif
    Posts
    3,686

    Judge Bolton ruling = illegal

    Judge Bolton ruling against AZ illegalPosted by Darla, ADMIN / National Director on August 23, 2010 at 11:54am in Admin Alerts
    Send Message View Discussions
    There's hope!!!!!!





    Subject: Judge Bolton ruling against AZ illegal





    In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation
    into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in

    Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona
    by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.

    The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special

    article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part,

    "Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American
    lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has
    never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric

    Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you
    something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your
    face.

    "Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:

    "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and

    Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court
    shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before
    mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."

    In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no

    Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As
    the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court
    can issue rulings that involve a state.

    This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court

    of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have
    any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.

    Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal
    government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has

    no authority to hear the case.

    The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution
    provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for
    Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be

    accessed at the link above.

    In a related development, another explosive discovery was made
    by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The
    Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war

    against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should
    there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal
    government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America.

    From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find

    these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage
    in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will
    not admit of delay."

    No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern

    border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault
    of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools
    and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very
    lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in

    kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including
    aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities
    from just across the Mexican border.

    This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran

    sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.

    The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this
    country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the
    case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government,

    including waging war in its self-defense.

    This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that
    only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be
    ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the

    federal government with a vengeance.

    Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona
    legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal
    bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.


    http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Conserv ... ge-illegal
    The difference between an immigrant and an illegal alien is the equivalent of the difference between a burglar and a houseguest. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member TexasBorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Getyourassoutahere, Texas
    Posts
    3,783
    Very interesting development. My question is why hasn't Arizona recognized this? Surely the attorney's that represented Arizona looked into this?
    ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...

    William Barret Travis
    Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836

  3. #3
    Senior Member southBronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,799

    Re: Judge Bolton ruling = illegal

    [quote="grandmasmad"]Judge Bolton ruling against AZ illegalPosted by Darla, ADMIN / National Director on August 23, 2010 at 11:54am in Admin Alerts
    Send Message View Discussions
    There's hope!!!!!!





    Subject: Judge Bolton ruling against AZ illegal





    In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation
    into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in

    Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona
    by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.

    The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special

    article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part,

    "Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American
    lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has
    never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric

    Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you
    something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your
    face.

    "Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:

    "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and

    Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court
    shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before
    mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."

    In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no

    Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As
    the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court
    can issue rulings that involve a state.

    This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court

    of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have
    any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.

    Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal
    government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has

    no authority to hear the case.

    The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution
    provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for
    Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be

    accessed at the link above.

    In a related development, another explosive discovery was made
    by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The
    Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war

    against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should
    there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal
    government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America.

    From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find

    these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage
    in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will
    not admit of delay."

    No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern

    border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault
    of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools
    and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very
    lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in

    kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including
    aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities
    from just across the Mexican border.

    This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran

    sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.

    The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this
    country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the
    case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government,

    including waging war in its self-defense.

    This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that
    only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be
    ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the

    federal government with a vengeance.

    Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona
    legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal
    bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.


    http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Conserv ... ge-illegal[/quot



    we are with you gov Jan Brewer .Stand up for your right why are they for the Illigal immigrant don't they see what going on why don't the gov & Obama go to Az & see what going On. my friends have the same thing in wilkes Barra PA it bad close the Border . but her mayor Is doing much more then obama is
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •