How will Democrats explain this about one of Kavanaugh's accusers!

The Blacksphere

One Democrat Kavanaugh Accuser BITES THE DUST

By Kevin Jackson -
September 30, 2018



Democrats really know how to pick their poster children.

I guess the fact that Plaintiff #3 against Kavanaugh was represented by creepy porn lawyer, Michael Avenatti didn’t raise any “blue” flags.

With Democrats, the sleazier the people involved, the more “credible” Democrats claim them to be.
Just like Julie Swetnick. Look at how she has backfired, as this tweet suggests:
BREAKING: Michael Avanetti’s client Julie Swetnick was sued in 2000 for making false sexual assault allegations.
Trending: Why Leftists Don’t Want Blasey Ford’s Past Examined
Her employer determined she engaged in “inappropriate conduct” & made “false & retaliatory allegations” of sexual harassment against two male co-workers
Amy @RightHook99

BREAKING: Michael Avanetti's client Julie Swetnick was sued in 2000 for making false sexual assault allegations.

Her employer determined she engaged in “inappropriate conduct" & made “false & retaliatory allegations” of sexual harassment against two male co-workers.
5:27 PM - Sep 29, 2018



Say it isn’t so. But one of Kavanaugh’s accusers has a history of lying about sexual abuse?!

And if that isn’t enough, she’s been accused of “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct”?
So says The Daily Caller:
The woman who charges she was gang-raped at a party where Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was present, Julie Swetnick, had a lawsuit filed against her by a former employer that alleged she engaged in “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” towards two male co-workers, according to court documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Get it; not one, but two male co-workers.
Apparently Swetnick wasn’t just going to the “gang rapes” to observe. Recall that Swetnick admitted to attending as many as ten gang-rapes. Even braindead Democrats knew they hired the wrong woman for this gig.
One gang rape and people might think you were tricked into going. Ten gang rapes, and let’s just call things as they are. Sex parties, and Swetnick enjoyed them.
Next, Swetnick has another problem. Her issue pertains to her academic credentials. The article continues,
WebTrends, a web analytics company headquartered in Portland, filed the defamation and fraud lawsuit against Swetnick in Oregon in November 2000 and also alleged that she lied about graduating from Johns Hopkins University.
Yes, the old academic credentials. How many Lefties have faked their credentials, Senator Blumenthal?

Ford lied as well, saying she was a licensed psychologist, when in fact she isn’t licensed at all. She’s an academic.

Democrats handled Ford with kid gloves, speaking of her courage. They gloated over her clinical description of the drama that supposedly occurred at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh. They offered excuses for her lack of emotion in describing the supposed horrific event. Simply put, Democrats cover for her lies. And there is a reason they didn’t bring up Plaintiffs 1 or 2 in the Senate hearings on Kavanaugh. Lack of credibility.
Ford has lost credibility as well. Real survivors of sexual assault didn’t buy her act. More will say the same. Thus Democrats will look for more “survivors” of Kavanaugh.
We will continue to ask questions about the 2 and 3. Why aren’t we having hearings into their allegations? We all know the answer.

https://theblacksphere.net/2018/09/o...ites-the-dust/