Thread: L.A. mayor urges new round of city job cuts

L.A. mayor urges new round of city job cuts

Villaraigosa wants to eliminate between 1,200 and 2,000 more positions.

His stance signals a more aggressive approach to the city's budget crisis.

By Phil Willon David Zahniser and Maeve Reston
February 11, 2010 | 8:06 p.m.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa announced a second round of city job cuts Thursday -- between 1,200 and 2,000 positions -- and warned that much deeper layoffs would be needed if the City Council and employee unions failed to act quickly on proposals to cut payroll costs, trim services and auction city assets.

With the current $212-million budget shortfall expected to double next year, Villaraigosa said the threat of layoffs was his only leverage to force the city's powerful unions to accept lower wages and help rescue the city from insolvency.

If the council hesitates to act or the unions resist, Villaraigosa vowed to order agency heads to send additional pink slips to more of the city's roughly 37,000 workers.

"Layoffs are the only . . . tool I have to be relevant here. Otherwise, I am at the mercy of forces beyond my control," Villaraigosa said at a meeting with The Times' editorial board. "I can control layoffs. I can't control that the council will pass anything. I don't have a vote on the council."

Villaraigosa's threats provided the clearest sign yet that he has decided to take a more aggressive approach to the worsening financial crisis, which threatens the city's credit rating and ability to borrow.

For the last two months, he had worked mostly behind the scenes. But that changed last week after the council voted to postpone any layoffs for 30 days. The next day, the mayor ordered agency heads to eliminate 1,000 positions paid from the city's general fund budget, a move that he expects will lead to hundreds of transfers and at least 250 layoffs.

Since Tuesday, Villaraigosa has gone to the council, the news media and the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce to publicly campaign for quick action. The second wave of job cuts would be part of his proposed 2010-11 budget, he said.

Los Angeles County Supervisor Gloria Molina, a political veteran who backed Villaraigosa as a candidate for mayor, said she was alarmed at the start of the week to see him appearing with former Beatle Ringo Starr on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in the middle of a fiscal crisis. That dismay turned to relief, Molina said, when Villaraigosa appeared before the council Tuesday.

"I think he should be in council members' offices every single day trying to convince them to follow his lead," she said.

Villaraigosa's plan for slashing the size of the workforce is in sync with some council members, including Bernard C. Parks, Jan Perry and Greig Smith. But he remains at odds with council members Richard Alarcon, Paul Koretz and Janice Hahn, who want to move targeted workers into vacant positions unaffected by the budget crisis.

Koretz called Villaraigosa's plan "extreme" and complained that the mayor was showing little interest in working collaboratively with council members.

"This is jumping the gun," Koretz said of the latest plan to cut the workforce. "And I'm somewhat baffled that the mayor is pushing so hard in this direction, doing layoffs before we've turned over every stone -- and there are some that we've barely touched."

Alarcon signaled that such a large cut to the civilian payroll would prompt calls to halt Villaraigosa's campaign to continue hiring police officers.

"I don't think you can have that discussion without talking about equitable cuts in the Police Department," said Alarcon, who also warned that cuts would lead to "dramatic" reductions in city services.

Villaraigosa said Police Department reductions should be considered only after the council agrees to consolidate some departments, explores every revenue opportunity and pares the workforce of non-sworn police employees.

On Thursday, the mayor also promised to veto any attempt by council members to spend money from their discretionary accounts. He has asked members to loan the reserve fund $40 million from those accounts.

The first test of that threat may come in the next few days when the council considers requests by four members to tap $862,000 of that money for transit projects.

Council President Eric Garcetti said members "absolutely support" moving money controlled by members and the mayor into the city's reserves. First, financial analysts must determine how much money is available, he said.

Villaraigosa said he was not trying to pick a fight with the council or labor. He also acknowledged that he had been "part of the problem" for not recognizing the severity of the city's economic crisis -- or eliminating a structural deficit that existed even before the recession hit.

Still, the mayor expressed growing frustration that some council members, frequently with support from employee unions, continue to resist layoffs, furloughs, the elimination of departments or the privatization of city assets, such as parking meters.

"Urgency is what is missing here," he said.

Villaraigosa said his call for additional employee cuts would lead, at a minimum, to reduced library hours and parks and recreation programs. He dismissed suggestions that he lacked the authority to slash the size of the city's payroll.

That message was greeted with disappointment by the city's employee unions, which accused the mayor of proposing new jobs cuts with "little to no analysis."

"Each and every cut represents a loss of services," said Victor Gordo, an attorney with the Coalition of L.A. City Unions, which represents 22,000 workers. "The council is engaged in a balanced and thoughtful approach to this fiscal crisis. We would urge [the mayor's office] to do the same."

Molina said she constantly runs into residents who want her thoughts on the city budget saga.

"They look at it like there's some kind of soap opera going on at City Hall," she said. "It's unbelievable, and very unfortunate, that this is our city that may go down in flames."

phil.willon@latimes.com

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 5929.story

Undoubtedly, the city has some pencil-pushers that could be eliminated, but reduction of police and fire should not be at the top tier of consideration. Villaraigosa is only fiscally responsible to save his political tush. He should be examining his anything-goes for illegals and gangs policy first.

And tent city will morph into plywood huts, and sewer systems will morph into small raw sewage rivers flowing into the Ocean. The Archdiocese will become the Capital, and middle class people will be reduced to selling chicklets on street corners, while drug cartels run amuck. It sounds like mexico to me.

Originally Posted by JohnnyYuma

And tent city will morph into plywood huts, and sewer systems will morph into small raw sewage rivers flowing into the Ocean. The Archdiocese will become the Capital, and middle class people will be reduced to selling chicklets on street corners, while drug cartels run amuck. It sounds like mexico to me.

Top Ten Cities with Lowest Crime Rate Ranking

Of the cities with a population of 500,000 or greater, the top ten cities with the lowest crime rate read as follows:

Honolulu, HI - Population 906,349
El Paso, TX – Population 612,374
New York, NY – Population 8,345,075
San Jose, CA – Population 945,197
Austin, TX – Population 753,535
San Diego, CA – Population 1,271,655
Seattle, WA – Population 598,077
Portland, OR – Population 553,023
Denver, CO – Population 592,881
Los Angeles, CA – Population 3,850,920

Read more at Suite101: Safest Cities in America: City Crime Rankings Name the Safest and Most Dangerous Cities in US http://peacesecurity.suite101.com/artic ... z0fIPa02M7

So, illegal aliens make for a safe city? Illegal activity makes for a safe city. What is safe on paper, is never necessarily safe in real life.

Originally Posted by JohnnyYuma

So, illegal aliens make for a safe city? Illegal activity makes for a safe city. What is safe on paper, is never necessarily safe in real life.

Yes, everything can be made to look good on paper, but the real world is completely different.

L.A. city proper is small compared to the Inland Empire. Carson, Long Beach, East LA and other great areas lye just outside city limits.