Thread: Lawmakers Split over Bailout

Lawmakers split over bailout
Democrats say they reached bipartisan agreement on set of principles, but Republican balk. White House meeting contentious.

Tami Luhby, CNNMoney.com senior writer
Last Updated: September 25, 2008: 6:59 PM ET



NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Chaos erupted on Thursday in the negotiations over the proposed financial bailout as lawmakers bickered over competing counterproposals to the Bush administration's $700 billion rescue plan.

A meeting at the White House between President Bush, congressional leaders and the presidential candidates was meant to speed approval of an agreement, but instead revealed deep divisions between Democrats and Republicans.

Earlier in the day, congressional negotiators said they had agreed to a set of principles on revisions to the rescue plan, which calls for the Treasury Department to buy up bad mortgage securities from banks in an effort to get them to lend again.

The proposal will help homeowners, curb executive pay packages at participating firms and provide oversight of Treasury's actions, said Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., a key architect of the congressional effort, in a lunchtime address.

"We've reached a fundamental agreement on a set of principles, one, for taxpayers, which is tremendously important," he said. "We're very confident we can act expeditiously."

Details on the plans
The principles call for Congress to make $250 billion available immediately with $100 billion available, if needed, without requiring additional congressional approval, said two senior Democratic aides familiar with the negotiations. The second half of $350 billion would then become available by a special approval of Congress.

On executive compensation, the draft would require limits on compensation for executives of any company participating in the bailout. These caps would apply for as long as the company is in the program. This would include some language to limit excess "golden parachutes."

Treasury will also get an equity stake in the companies being helped by the bailout, though what type remains to be worked out.

Still to be worked out is whether to allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgage terms, a provision backed by many Democrats and community activists but opposed by Republicans and the banking industry.

The bankruptcy provision is not the only sticking point, however. House Republicans are not on board, according to Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio.

"House Republicans have not agreed to any plan at this point," Boehner said.

Instead, they issued a statement of economic rescue principles that calls for Wall Street to fund the recovery by injecting private capital - not taxpayer dollars - into the financial markets. Easing tax laws would prompt investors to put in their own dollars, they said.

The plan also calls for: participating firms to disclose the value of the mortgage assets on their books, ending Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's securitization of "unsound mortgages," reviewing the performance of the credit rating agencies and having the Securities and Exchange Commission audit failed companies to ensure their financial standing was accurately portrayed.

House Republicans also want to create a panel to make recommendations for reforming the financial industry by year's end.

Meanwhile, the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee has another idea. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said he doesn't support the Treasury plan until there is serious consideration of alternatives. He proposed Thursday adding funds to the Federal Reserve and Treasury to allow them to lend more to financial institutions.

Bush still hopeful
Before the afternoon meeting, Bush said he expects a deal "very shortly."

After, a counselor to the president said "we're getting closer. There's some more that has to be done. It's going to be a consensus plan at the end of the day."

"Both sides are going to have to work hard to get to an agreement," presidential counselor Ed Gillespie said on CNN.

Administration officials have spent countless hours this week behind closed doors with and in public hearings before Congress. Lawmakers were hoping to have a deal agreeable to both parties hammered out before Thursday's meeting at the White House.

On Wednesday night, Bush took the nation's airwaves in a prime-time address in which he laid out a looming economic disaster.

"The government's top economic experts warn that, without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic and a distressing scenario would unfold," Bush said. "More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically."

CNN Correspondent Kate Bolduan and Congressional Producer Deirdre Walsh contributed to this report.

First Published: September 25, 2008: 1:28 PM ET

The crisis: A timeline

Bailout: What's next

This isn't Armageddon





http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/25/news/ec ... 2008092513

Bush still hopeful
Before the afternoon meeting, Bush said he expects a deal "very shortly."

Yea? Well he expected on with his AMNESTY BILL too! But, it DID NOT HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!

BS How does he figure it will hlep out the homeowner? And if they did work some arrangement for the gov to make money off of this do you really think we will see any of that profit? NO NO NO I say let wall street fall. It might hurt however, it will be a long time before they try anything like this again. It's going to hurt one way or another and I would rather it be without using our money and then have it fail.

Americans gain NOTHING! but more DEBT!

Originally Posted by JAK

Bush still hopeful
Before the afternoon meeting, Bush said he expects a deal "very shortly."

Yea? Well he expected on with his AMNESTY BILL too! But, it DID NOT HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!!!

I remember him saying I will see you all at the signing and it NEVER HAPPENED!! WE SHUT DOWN THE GAME!!!