Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,928

    Media Blackout for Black Panthers

    This is an old story, but Bill O'Reilly spent some time on his TV program (FOX) this evening discussing the extent to which this story is being ignored by the mainstream press.


    EDITORIAL: Media blackout for Black Panthers

    Explosive racist allegations ignored by poodles in the press
    By THE WASHINGTON TIMES

    7:01 p.m., Friday, July 2, 2010

    Where is the New York Times? Where is The Washington Post? Where are CBS and NBC? A whistleblower makes explosive allegations about the Department of Justice; his story is backed by at least two other witnesses; and the allegations involve the two hot-button issues of race and of blatant politicization of the justice system. A potential constitutional confrontation stemming from the scandal brews between the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. A congressman highly respected for thoughtfulness and bipartisanship has all but accused the department of serious impropriety. By every standard of objective journalism, this adds up to real news.

    Or it would be real news if a Republican Justice Department stood accused. It would be real news if the liberal media weren't mostly in the tank for our celebrated but failing first black president.

    Tomorrow, the Civil Rights Commission will hear long-awaited testimony from J. Christian Adams, who resigned from the Voting Section of the Justice Department after the department improperly ordered him to refuse compliance with the commission's lawful subpoena. Mr. Adams first told his story in public in these pages on June 28 and later did two major interviews with Fox News' Megyn Kelly. In those appearances, he flatly accused the Obama Justice Department of adopting an unlawful, immoral policy identified in previous Washington Times editorials - namely, enforcing civil rights laws against white perpetrators who victimized minorities but never against black perpetrators who victimize whites or Asians. If this is indeed the policy, it makes a scandalous mockery of the cherished American principle of "equal justice under the law."

    All these allegations stem from what should have been a slam-dunk voter-intimidation case against members of the New Black Panther Party videotaped in menacing behavior outside a Philadelphia polling place in 2008. The Obama Justice Department dropped or seriously reduced all the charges or penalties in the case after it already effectively had been won. Mr. Adams' former colleague, longtime award-winning civil rights lawyer Christopher Coates, has been reported on multiple occasions to have backed Mr. Adams' version of events and of the Obama team's openly discriminatory policy.

    If the department's motives are not racial or racist, Justice officials surely appear political. One of the Black Panthers against whom the department declined to press charges was an official poll watcher for the Democratic Party and an elected local party official. The department dropped charges just four days before another election, allowing him again to serve as a poll watcher.

    Mr. Adams says the official most directly involved in dropping the case, Steven H. Rosenbaum - whose ethics have been subject to judicial sanction - refused to read his own team's legal briefs before deciding to dismiss the case. Mr. Adams accuses Thomas E. Perez, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, of providing false answers in testimony to the Civil Rights Commission.

    On a parallel track, The Washington Times has reported strong circumstantial evidence suggesting that department officials may have consulted the White House before dismissing the case. That possibility, too, cries out for investigation.

    These broad policy questions and suggestions of political chicanery are important. Do we have a nation of laws equally applied to all, or is justice being reduced to raw politics? Investigating such questions is the essence of the news business. Failure to look into such a scandal is evidence of the institutional corruption of the much-ballyhooed "fourth branch of government," a supposedly independent media.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... -panthers/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    Glenn Beck on his radio show today, played the audio of what these Blank Panthers were saying to voters outside Philadephia polling place that day, in which Holder has refused to purse a federal voter-intimidation case against members of the New Black Panther Party, videotaped in menacing behavior outside a Philadelphia polling place in 2008.

    The language could have not been any more intimidating or racist than the words that spewed from the mouths of these black, militant racists!

    Does threatening to kill or encouraging others to do so based upon the color of one’s skin, dressed in military-type clothing, while holding a deadly weapon in your hand constitute voter intimidation!!!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Tbow009's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,211

    LOL

    And the Federal Government is protecting that guy. Thats the scary thing....pffft

  4. #4
    Senior Member MontereySherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,370
    Must be a good blackout. On Megyn Kelley "America Live" this was part of her segment "

    July 8, 2010

    Minister Slams New Black Panther Actions
    Bishop E.W. Jackson Sr. on racial politics

    For some reason I cannot get the video to play. http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/america-l ... t_id=87651

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •