Meet the Clooneys continued - Chapters 15-16


Chapter 15: Clooney’s Scottish Soros Spectacular


The same goes for George. Since the Italian wedding spectacular, his movie career has tanked with three major commercial flops. “Mr. Humanitarian” George Clooney has also done little to no philanthropic work compared to previous endeavors since the South Sudan split. However, he did in November of 2015 go to Scotland to hand out sandwiches to the homeless. Not really. He went for a photo op with ten locals to remind the world that he used to be “Mr. Everyman” and a supposed supporter of “humanitarian” causes….before heading off to a conference of rich 1% globalists to bring “awareness” to “the important impact charitable donations can have in making a difference in the world”, says John Prendergast, Not on Our Watch official and close friend of George Soros. Anything “charitable” Clooney does is affiliated with Soros because he is a globalist. He is not now nor has ever been “Mr. Everyman”. As we will find, this endeavor does not help Scotland, it’s locals, nor the downtrodden. It is being used to push the decline of national borders and sovereignties via “humanitarianism” via the “refugee” crisis.







If, after all we have discovered about George Clooney’s “humanitarianism” in Africa, one finds it difficult to believe a sandwich shop owner in Scotland called Clooney’s people up one day to see if he would mind bringing “awareness” to the plight of the homeless there, that person would be wise to be skeptical. Social Bite, the “a small sandwich shop in Edinburgh with the idea that we’d make whatever salary we need, donate all profits to charity, and commit to training and giving jobs to homeless people” has “reached out” to George Clooney to bring “awareness” to their “humanitarian” objectives. The same “awareness” Clooney brought to the Sudan long enough for it to break free for him, Nespresso, and Soros’ brother to lay claim to the coffee fields, as others laid claim to the oil? The Sudan has since slid right back into civil war, and, except for the random op-ed penned by someone else and signed by him, Clooney has all but disappeared. His “awareness” is no longer needed there on such a grand scale so he now wants to bring his “awareness” to Scotland on a much smaller scale?. How noble. But for what cause? And, as with the subjective language of payment in the Sudan, how much is a “salary we need”? As with all of other Clooney’s “humanitarian” endeavors, speculating requires analyzing the ties that those supporting the endeavor have to Clooney’s globalist puppets. It seems the reality of this trip for Clooney is to shill for the elites at the Scottish Business Awards supported by the Royal Bank of Scotland where attendees willing to pay £10,000 for a “platinum package” will get special access to him. One of the main backers of this endeavor is the Hunter Foundation .



One core principal of the Hunter Foundation is that “philanthropy is not a substitute for government investment.” Yes, progressives, we know that government knows best how we should run our lives and spend our money. Not just any government, either, but “global” bodies like the UN who should determine how sovereign nations should be forced to operate. In any event, when asked about issues with which its foundation plans on dealing with in the future, notice the language of this statement: “In Rwanda, we’re also currently developing a hybrid social enterprise that blends capitalism and social benefit whereby we’re investing in a food oil manufacturing facility that will work with farmers (100,000+) to produce for the factory. Our profits will be reinvested for the common good but our co-investors are all firmly there for the profit; I guess it’s a Yunus+ model and it will be interesting to see how that develops.” More about the “Yunus model” can be found here.


George Soros and Muhuammed Yunus

One core principal of the Hunter Foundation is that “philanthropy is not a substitute for government investment.” Yes, progressives, we know that government knows best how we should run our lives and spend our money. Not just any government, either, but “global” bodies like the UN who should determine how sovereign nations should be forced to operate. In any event, when asked about issues with which its foundation plans on dealing with in the future, notice the language of this statement: “In Rwanda, we’re also currently developing a hybrid social enterprise that blends capitalism and social benefit whereby we’re investing in a food oil manufacturing facility that will work with farmers (100,000+) to produce for the factory. Our profits will be reinvested for the common good but our co-investors are all firmly there for the profit; I guess it’s a Yunus+ model and it will be interesting to see how that develops.” More about the “Yunus model” can be found here. It works much like the cronyism involved in “humanitarian” economics. Remember the subjective language used by the globalists to justify their looting of resources worldwide. “Climate change” per the UN head has nothing to do with the environment but is being used to establish a new form of global economics that eliminates free market capitalism, turning the global economy over to the globalists with the citizens as their workers. “Hybrid social enterprise” that “blends capitalism and social benefit” is that. All of the money made will go to “a food, oil manufacturing facility that will work with farmers…to produce for the ‘common good’”. “Common good”…sounds a lot like these two:



Then, as with Clooney’s “Sustainable Nespresso” whatever, “Our profits will be reinvested for the common good but our co-investors are all firmly there for the profit”. See…profit is good for the elites, not the rest of us, for they know what is best for the “common good”, and it is okay for them to profit from the rape of natural resources in Africa because they give enough back to the “Common good” or, in Clooney’s case “to lift farmers out of poverty “or in Social Bites case “we’d make whatever salary we need”. Which is how much, exactly? How utterly subjective is that language? This looting of Africa has gone forever, and the rich get richer as the poor get poorer because it is “humanitarianism” disguised as a wealth redistribution scheme.

Two primary board members of the Hunter Foundation are Sir Tom Hunter, entrepreneur and philanthropist who received the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy in 2013 and, yes, Vartan Gregorian, see the “100 Lives” initiative.After discussions with Vartan Gregorian, head of the Carnegie Foundation in New York, and getting a large investment from him, Sir Tom Hunter found himself on board with the globalists when he “set a cause and a method which has resulted in the foundation donating “in excess of £50m to supporting, educational and entrepreneurial projects in Scotland and sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa in partnership with former President Bill Clinton through the Clinton Hunter Development Initiative.” Aww…what a nice rich guy, until one analyzes the language. “Sustainable development” in “Suh Saharan Africa” with money from Vartan Gregorian? Where have we heard that before?
As we ask with George, we, too, must ask Hunter why Africa? Are there not enough poor people in poverty in Scotland, the US, or other areas of the world that could use their financial help? Yes, there are, but neither have the resources available for exploitation that Africa does. The book “The Looting Machine: Warlords, Oligarchs, Corporations, Smugglers, and the Theft of Africa’s Wealth” by Tom Burgis shows “great ambition, laying out the individual strands of the warp and woof of a huge tapestry of disparate individuals and business entities around the world systematically looting sub-Saharan Africa…. Many people loudly lament the steady injection into such nations of fruitless foreign aid and economic assistance. But the rewards of looting are so substantial that they provide huge incentives for maintaining the status quo. The aid flow into Africa, Burgis notes, is tiny compared with the value of the exploited resources flowing in the other direction…. So, the abuses will continue even if this or that shell corporation, corrupt African president or foreign robber baron is exposed, Burgis laments.” Yes, the incentive is there for the globalists to perpetuate war, retaining the status quo in areas such as Sudan, for massive financial gain. However, as long as what they are doing is deemed “humanitarian”, no one should EVER question it.



Keep that in mind when investigating some of the “beneficial projects” with which Tom Hunter has been affiliated where Africa is concerned. In September 2004, the “Make Poverty History” campaign was officially launched as the “UK mobilization of an international coalition, the Global Call to Action Against Poverty (G-CAP), led by Oxfam International, Action Aid and DATA – the controversial Africa charity set up by U2 front man, Bono [one of George’s best friends] and multi-billionaires, George Soros [yes, that Soros], and Microsoft’s Bill Gates, the world’s second richest person with a fortune of just under $50 billion.” They could work to “Make Poverty History” by donating their own massive wealth, but that is not ever an option, it seems. Pay attention to the language here: “ MPH’s policy demands on the UK government are fairly radical, especially its calls for “trade justice not free trade”, which would require G8 and EU countries, notably the UK, to stop forcing through free market policies on poor countries as part of aid, trade deals or debt relief. MPH also says rich countries should immediately double aid by $50bn per year and finally meet 35-year old promises to spend 0.7 per cent of their national income in development aid. More and better aid, meanwhile, should be matched by cancellation of the “unpayable” debts of the world’s poorest countries through a “fair and transparent international process” that uses new money, not slashed aid budgets” New money, stop “free market”, “erase debt”, “rich” countries should “immediately double” aid…end the capitalism upon which the U.S. economy is base in lieu of a new “wealth redistribution” based global economy. Remember this is the goal of “Climate Change” and “Sustainability” via the U. N.



Clooney has been on board with this elimination of national sovereignty and pro global banking system in exchange for the 1% ruling the rest for a long time as already documented. This trip to Scotland is no different. His puppet masters told him to show up to agenda push. It is no surprise that his “sustainable” Nespresso campaign and this “sustainable” Scotland campaign both of which deal with redistribution of wealth to the globalists’ pet projects in Africa are being touted by Clooney just before the climate talks in Paris. The “green scheme” was a big payoff for him as it is a huge part of the globalist wealth redistribution agenda.
It makes sense, then, that the last time, Clooney was in Scotland “professionally” was for Tom Hunter’s backed Live 8 in July of 2005, the same year Clooney was picked to head the “humanitarian” missions in Sudan. Bob Geldof, Clooney BFF Bono the coalition of NGOs and church groups that comprised “Make Poverty History” asked us to “believe that (Bush and Blair) (could) be won over to the cause of the poor and oppressed” to justify “helping” in Africa.



Geldof “hailed the pre-(G8 summit announcement that there would be a debt forgiveness package for some countries in sub-Saharan Africa as a ‘victory for millions,’ claiming, ‘Tomorrow 280 million Africans will wake up for the first time in their lives without owing you or me a penny’”. Wrong. Even the World socialists understood what a scam all of this “humanitarianism for Africa” was about when they declared, “What nonsense! In the first instance, Africa’s poor do not owe ‘you and me’ anything. Their debts are to major corporations, financial institutions, imperialist governments and multilateral organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. None of these contemplate any measures to seriously alleviate Africa’s plight because they are intent on perpetuating the exploitation of the continent.” Exactly.



Furthermore, Michael Chussodovsky, a Canadian economist and contributor to “The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order” states, ““Most casual observers might assume that the money generated by corporate sponsors, DVD sales, performance royalties and direct contributions would be funneled into various charitable organizations aiding the poorest people of developing nations around the world. They would be wrong.” Instead, as Chussodovsky illustrates the money raised in almost every instance is used to pay off the corporate creditors of indebted countries. In effect, the entire focus of the money generated by Live8 was to provide direct funds to corporations that were ‘owed money’ by these impoverished nations. What is even worse, according to Chussodovsky, is that” those same monetary amounts contributed by Live8 to these private corporations to provide more relief to them for the money they had lent to these impoverished nations was then deducted from the direct aid packages and social service programs formerly contributed by the G8 to these countries”. As Chussodovsky also clearly states, “For each dollar of ‘debt cancellation’ to the international financial institutions, the G8 will reduce the flow of foreign aid to these countries. In other words, the foreign aid earmarked to finance much needed social programs will now go directly into the coffers of the IMF and the World Bank.” So what was being promoted around the world as a “humanitarian effort” to help some of the poorest countries on the planet was actually an exercise in paying off international financial institutions for aid they had previously lent these nations, while guaranteeing the reduction of the same amount in future funding for these very programs. Stealing from the poor to give to the rich. Classy. That said, remember who Hunter said inspired him to enter into this type of “philanthropy”: Vartan Gregorian of the “100 Lives Initiative”.
All this begs the question: why Scotland for this event? No…it is not because of these “socially just” sandwich shops. Please. Social Bite was founded in 2012 to employ local homeless people and donates all profits to solving social problems at home and abroad. Noble. They do. There is no existence to prove otherwise. In this same year, Josh Littlejohn established the Scottish Business Awards, which is where George is going to give his keynote. This is where the story falls apart a bit. Josh says he approached George in January of 2015 after recognizing George’s humanitarian work. However, his partnerAlice Thompson, said in a separate interview it was she who persuaded George Clooney to come to Scotland for “lunch.” Sure…lunch. Consider further down in the article, Alice states that “Social Bite’s annual turnover is £1.5million and all the profits – around £5000 a month – are split between Shelter Scotland, Vision Eye Care Hospital in Bangladesh, MicroLoan Foundation in Malawi and Zambia, and the STV Appeal.” The monthly profits are 5,000/month, and only one quarter (1,250/month) goes to Scotland? The rest goes to….Africa ? Why does any of this money have to go to Africa? They pay their homeless employees a “living wage” and then say, “Oh you’ve made enough, so now we’re sending the rest to Africa”. Are there no other poor people, children, and elderly in Scotland who could benefit from that? Of course, but the point is getting “regular” people to “donate” money to their “humanitarian” slush funds that line the elites pockets.



Keep in mind that Clooney as their “advocate” makes $20 million per movie, already made $40 million from Nespresso while owing 4 mansions around the globe, traveling on private jets leaving behind an epic carbon footprint, and saying nothing much about the cheaper foreign workers brought in by Disney to replace the American ones to help offset the losses of films such as the commercial disaster known as Tomorrowland. Now all these poor legal citizens are out of jobs so corporate Disney can protect its profits. Tsk Tsk. BUT George is a ‘humanitarian” who donated $1,000 during his photo op to bring “awareness” to “social justice” issues worldwide (that in turn line his bank account). As Obama says, “at some point you’ve made too much money”. You and me. Not the globalists. They will tell us when we have made enough.













Back to the “Why Scotland?” question… What political occurrences there matter to the globalists? Because with Clooney it is all politics all the time. Flashback to 2014. Scotland was to vote on whether to break from the U.K. to become an independent sovereign nation again. As one who forces the balkanization of nations worldwide from the Ukraine to Thailand to the Sudan as his form of “democracy”, one might assume Soros and the globalists would have been for this action; however, as he is a primary builder and financial backer of the E. U. as a “one world unified government” is their goal, no…they are against it. Greece, Scotland, Catalonia..they cannot have these nationalist movements win because they will break up their “global union” utopia. Therefore, Soros warned of the dangers facing the currency if Scotland became independent. Speaking at an event in London, he told ITV News that Scotland would have a “very difficult relationship” with the rest of the UK if it tried to keep sterling (the British currency) and it “would not be practical” for Scotland to remain with the Bank of England. However, he also warned it would be “inefficient and potentially dangerous” for Scotland to create its own currency, because “currencies can be attacked and speculated against. And when you have a weak currency, positions can be taken”. Warned? Sounds more like threatened. Speculating against currencies, making countries weak, and then being in a position to “take” them is how Soros makes his living.







Keep this in mind, too, that this event is being sponsored by the Royal Scottish Bank, which announced that they would move their headquarters to London in the event of a Yes vote in the Scottish referendum. Another threat. Of course, the RSB is now under scrutiny for bad money practices which have been fleecing the exact clients they claimed they were trying to help. Sounds familiar. The RBS, once a “colossus with a balance sheet nearly twice the size of the British economy, had deliberately pushed small businesses to bankruptcy so it could pick up their assets cheaply. For three years, the bank has vigorously denied the allegations about its Global Restructuring Group (GRG). But the meeting at the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) convinced McEwan outright denial was no longer an option, according to insiders. Now, they say, the 300-year-old lender is considering a compensation scheme for small firms – from tire makers to nursing home operators – which say GRG abused them or forced them out of business. The cost to the bank, rescued during the financial crisis by British taxpayers, could run to billions of pounds.” That is the Soros way. Cause chaos, cause collapse, swoop in to pick up the cheap pieces, and leave the taxpayer with the bill. This is for whom Clooney spoke while in Scotland.



Odd that Tom Hunter and “Mr. Democracy” Clooney, who had no trouble voicing his support for the Soros led rebellions in the Ukraine, Sudan, and elsewhere, had no opinion. The glaringly obvious explanation for that is the time of the referendum…September 2014. Wedding month. Amal rescinded her position on the Israeli hit council for the UN supposedly to avoid bad publicity during wedding month. George had nothing to say about anything political during that month. They had a narrative to set. Announcing their stance on the pro globalist agenda was not in the cards when trying to establish public favor as the “greatest humanitarian power couple on earth”. It still is not as they seem to be setting up 2016 as the year the Clooneys re-establish their “humanitarian” brand. In the meantime, we are still supposed to believe they are out to save the world from itself using everyone else’s money.

Chapter 16: What’s Next?

Yes, 2016 is shaping up to bet he relaunch of the Clooneys as “humanitarians” in their push to derail the worldwide collapse of their 1% politics. See, Clooney famously stated in 2013 after Obama’s re-election about Obamacare, “”People keep talking about how this has to be a great negotiation, but there isn’t any negotiating a law. We negotiate on all these other topics, but this was put into law, and [Obama] was reelected on it. It was reaffirmed, it was passed through the Supreme Court — it’s a law. You don’t like it? Win an election. That’s how it works. That’s how the country works. But you don’t get to shut down the government because of it. That’s not how it works.”



There is no negotiating a law? Oh, my. Maybe not in tyrannical globalist 1% politics but there surely is in a constitutional republic. Then again, the 1% are not affected by Obamacare in any capacity as they have the time and money to get the care they deem best whenever and wherever they want, even if it means creating a huge carbon footprint as he did just before his wedding in September of 2014 when he took a private jet to Germany to see a private physician about back problems. So his snarky advice was to win an election? Win an election the opposition did—many of them. The politics that Clooney has shoved down our throats (but from which he himself is exempt) were resoundingly defeated in the midterm elections of 2014 in the United States. Not only was there a historic “sweep” with democrats losing local and state races across the country, but the GOP also elected women, minorities, and much younger candidates in, as The Huffington Post said, “a legislative body that has historically been dominated by older, white men”. The primary reasons for this “sweep” involve opposition to Obamacare, the Islamic State insurgency, the border crisis—basically the economy which has rapidly declined under Obama and national security which is non-existent in a “global citizen” world.



The icing on the proverbial cake that tempered Clooney’s hubris was this past November when his homestate of Kentucky“lost four of the five statewide constitutional offices they held coming into the election, including the governor’s office for just the second time since 1971”. That governor, Matt Bevin, is a Tea Party candidate—the same Tea Party that sat in solidarity with Elie Weisel during Netanyahu’s speech against a nuclear Iran. Clooney’s politics have been rejected soundly nationally and not just by “gun clinging Bible thumpers” but by American citizens who see what is happening to our country. It is no longer Democrat versus Republican. It is citizens versus globalists. By now, we know on which side Clooney resides.

The trouncing of his globalist politics is not just domestic, though. It is worldwide, especially regarding the Soros orchestrated “migrant crisis”. In Austria, the far-right Freedom Party (FPO) has stepped in against the tide of “refugees”. Denmark’s Danish People’s Party (DF) has been so successful that it now has the balance of power and has threatened to topple the government if it attempts to soften its stance on immigration. The Finns Party (PS) in Finland is essentially left-wing with its economic policies but is allied to a hardline stance on immigration. In France, the Front National (FN) party stunned Europe with its rise to power which came about due to its concerns about high immigration and home grown extremism. Germany. Greece. Hungary (already noted as their Prime Minister called out Soros for orchestrating this “migrant crisis”). Clooney’s favorite spot on the planet, Italy, has seen the far right Northern League party make real strides against the socialist government due to the “migrant crisis” with a landslide 50% of the vote in regions of Veneto and Lombardy. It also got 20% of the electorate in Tuscany, the left-wing heartland of the Democratic Party. The Netherlands.Sweden is on the verge of collapse. Switzerland. Keep in mind Europe has watched these “refugees” erase their borders for many years now, long before they started erasing the U.S. border. They know that the majority of those coming are not “women and children” but young, healthy men and only about half are from Syria. Most claim they are not fleeing because of war but for the “benefits” the west has to offer, which is why they land in welfare states. There is a reason why none of the rich Arab nations in the Middle East such as Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and Bahrain are taking these “war refugees”. They have denied them entry mostly due to fears of terrorism. Clooney’s buddies do not want them. Neither does Clooney as he has special “privacy” laws written for himself and the Mrs. in Italy and have a gate and CCTV installed around their British mansion. The rest of the world, however, is supposed to drop their borders, share their wealth, and allow the Muslim invasion to occur as a “humanitarian” effort…which is the platform the Clooneys will use next year in attempt to re-establish themselves as for the “little guy” and “one of us” when in reality we know they are the exact opposite.







Based on the current schedule for 2016 for the Clooneys thus far, it looks like Amal’s fashionista pipedream will be pushed by Vogue and her “work” will turn from defending terrorists and losing every case she touches to attempting her hand at her husband’s sort of “humanitarian” work. Since George’s brand of “humanitarianism” is globalist agenda pushing, one might guess that she will present herself as a “migrant refugee from the Middle East” just like these “poor trafficked children” throughout Europe and the U.S. Therefore, “we” should take “them” in unvetted. Time will tell as she is to keynote the 13thAnnual WINGS Luncheon on Thursday, April 14th, 2016 in Dallas, TX. The woman who defends terrorists and violators of human rights, especially those of women and homosexuals, is being touted by an organization that does actual work with victims of sex trafficking as a “a perfect voice to advocate against a crime that is happening in our own backyard”. Really? Because she has said nothing about the horrors of 1,400 White Children in Rotherdam raped by Muslim men From 1997 To 2013 in her “backyard” in England.







She also has said nothing about sex slaves in Muslim and Communist countries such as Cuba and China. One would think as the ninth ranked most “influential Arab under 40”, one would think she would use her very public platform to condemn the “human rights” violations of radical Muslim extremists groups…unless, of course, she supports them and their ideology, which she does. This group also claims “Her recent work as of 2015 has been in the field of advocating for the protection of women against physical and sexual violence in combat zones”. Really? Where? With Qaddafi’s kid? The King of Bahrain? The Elgin Marbles? The Muslim Brotherhood leader’s kid in Ireland? The Egyptian journalist? Where? She attended a conference for a photo op. Period. Either “New Friends New Life” is on the globalist payroll or they really have no clue and should be given one because having her on their roster destroys their credibility.

As for George, he has two movies coming out the first half of this year which means red carpet agenda pushing! The first movie, Hail Caesar, set for release on February 5th, is a comedy produced by the Cohen brothers who, in August of 2014, signed a pro-Israel statement criticizing Hamas with 190 other members of the Hollywood community. It must have been awkward when Amal visited the set, if she ever did. It was also recently revealed that Obama monitored Congress to target Israel. One can bet that will not come up during the press junket. The second movie, Money Monster, is scheduled for release on May 13th. Remember this movie is produced by Amal’s relative, and in it, fittingly, Clooney plays “Lee Cates , a TV money guru who gets taken hostage on air by Kyle (O’Connell), an ordinary man who lost all his money thanks to a bad recommendation from Lee. That’s certainly some powerful stuff that will not only lend Foster an opportunity to comment on financial types, but on the media as well”, and give Clooney ample opportunity to try to re-claim his “for the little guy” mantra…as he wears a suicide vest.







Make no mistake, 2016 will be an attempt by George to reclaim his “Mr. Everyman” title. Where has he been all of this time as his wife has been throwing democracy under the proverbial bus and lying to get criminals out of jail? We know he supports her politics. His politics, however, do not bode well for his first career, acting. Therefore, during this time, he kept a relatively low profile. They had not been seen together publicly since November 8th. She was seen at the party in London with her mother in December but no George, not even for holidays in Cabo with the Gerbers. George was going to have to eventually come out of hiding and deal with the monster he helped create while trying to rebuild his career. How does one best garner public sympathy? <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym> 101 says puppies and babies. George recently flat our denied any babies were on the way but puppies? Those he could manipulate for some positive <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym>. How can a person tell when something like adopting a puppy is a <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym> move? There is a <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym> release with talking points released to all major media outlets. In October, before they went “underground”, they supposedly adopted a basset hound mix named Millie. The photo of the happy “family” hit every entertainment news outlet it could find. Then they went to dinner with the Gerbers on November 8th and were seen looking petulant and withdrawn when they left the restaurant. Rumors of Amal’s inability to feel secure in herself next to the supermodel as well as needing to control every aspect of her sugar daddy’s life ran rampant with no denials from any camp. George went M.I.A until January when it was decided that another puppy adoption was in order. Initial reports said his assistant Angel made the arrangements to have the dog delivered to his parents in Kentucky. George is now saying in interviews he did it. Poor George. The more lies one tells, the harder it is to keep them straight. Either way, another noted <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym> stunt as the dog


was adopted on Christmas Eve but pictures of the dog and the sob story did not appear all over the entertainment pages until the day before George was scheduled to be in Amsterdam to shill for the George Soros slush fund known as Clooney’s “Not On Our Watch” project. Clooney’s done nothing with this organization publicly for over two years, but now with his career in the toilet and his political aspirations on hold as Amal’s lack of legal skills and her political background come to light, guess he felt re-establishing his “humanitarian” brand was the best way to win back the favor of his ticket buying audience. He claims he wants to “underexposed human rights abuses worldwide”. He even had a Sudanese national attend to thank him for his service. Really. Where has he been the last two years as ISIS, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and the other radical Muslim groups partook in the modern day genocide of Christians worldwide? It is never about the people. It is ALWAYS political and financial with George. He is not nor has he ever been the “humanitarian” he claims but a shill for the 1% to redistribute the wealth of the world into their pockets via “charity”. Take this event. He raised over $500,000 of other people’s money for George Soros. Where do people think it goes? To fight genocide? Please…the Clooneys did not show up for the 100thanniversary in Armenia which would have been a fabulous opportunity to call out the likes of ISIS. Nope. They only feel the need to mention the current slaughter of Christians worldwide when Amal can use it to scaremonger in her job. It is truly repulsive.

In any event, will the public buy it? Only time will tell. George seems quite hopeful given that his new release, “Hail, Caesar” is a Cohen Brothers film with Channing Tatum and Scarlett Johannsen. He also made it known that there will be abirthday celebration for her on Wednesday. Whether that is because there was no mention of it last year or it is to alert the press so pap shots can be done remains to be seen. What we do know this week so far is that Amal Clooney, who claimed in her interview with Cynthia McFadden that, “I think it’s wonderful celebrities would choose to spend their time or energy or, you know, the spotlight that they have to raise awareness about these causes,” says Amal, before insisting, “I don’t really see myself in the same way because I’m still doing the same job that I used to do before”…which was what, exactly? She continues, “If there’s more attention paid for whatever reason to that, then I think that’s good. You know, I think there is a certain responsibility that comes with that. I think I’m exercising it in an appropriate manner by continuing to do this kind of work.” What kind of work? Getting convicted prisoners and terrorists released from prison backdoor deals with politicians at the Clooney megamansion in England? Clooney said, “Asked if he and Amal, a noted lawyer and human rights activist, throw similar star-studded bashes in their homes in LA, England and Italy, George answered, “No, not so much. It’s not with a lot of famous people.It ends up being with a lot of politicians…So, two nights ago at our house in England, we had President Nasheed over to say, ‘Hello.’ It’s less about stars and more about some of the people whom she and I are working with in other parts of our lives.” “Two nights ago” would have been February 2nd. He was in NYC reshooting “Money Monster”. Yes, the Clooneys really do think we are stupid.



What will be most interesting during his press junkets and red carpet appearances during this Presidential election year will be how well he can stick to his talking points versus saying what is really on his mind. Remember the breakdown of how the money raised by the Social Bite “feed the Scottish homeless” campaign was really a way to redistribute our “wealth” to the 1% via “Africa” as ¾ of the profit went there? The same campaign is being used to “fair share” our “wealth” to “refugees” throughout Europe, thus staying on target with the Muslim invasion and border erasing. The Social Bite <acronym title="Google Page Ranking"><acronym title="Google Page Ranking">PR</acronym></acronym> campaign was never about helping the “little guy” in Scotland. As for politics, his allegiance to the Soros machine is well documented, so it was no surprise while he Scotland he said of Donald Trump, “”Anybody who says as intolerant words as those should be laughed at, and that’s pretty much what history will do”. Really? Because Clooney’s politics regarding the orchestrated Muslim invasion are being trounced just about everywhere. For what it is worth, he further went on to say, “”Who’d have thought Donald Trump would be at 30 percent. And that will end up working out well for the film”. Wrong. The movie flopped. Trump’s ratings are still high. Why? The internet has helped the world wake up. Until now, Clooney has not hit out at the either of the first two Hispanics to run for President yet, probably to avoid calls of “racism” as he is supposedly pro “equality” and all of that. However, on Monday, December 28th, 2015, George Soros publically called on voters to “resist the siren song of the likes of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz” in an op-ed for The Guardian entitled “The Terrorists and Demagogues Want Us to be Scared. We Mustn’t Give In”. From there, as expected, he goes on to condemn the non-existent “Islamophobia” of the likes of Cruz and Trump and says we must “reaffirm our commitment to the principles of an OPEN SOCIETY”. Expect George and Amal to use their public platforms not to condemn terrorism or the genocide of Christians by Muslim extremists worldwide but to use it to label the “right wing extremists”, who, at this rate, are anyone in the world who do not agree with their globalists politics, the real problem in order to push the globalists “open borders” “open society” agenda. Why not? Obama has.

Amal adds that she is only “engaging with the media on issues that I think are important.” Yes, we know how she “engages” the media and what “kind” of issues she thinks are important. Yet she claims she does not see herself as a celebrity. Really? Here she is at the “Hail Caesar!” premiere.



Keep these in mind with the understanding that on the same day, Nasheed met with the Commonwealth



Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma accompanied by his wife Laila Ali and his opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) chairperson Ali Waheed. Details of the meeting were, however, not disclosed. One would assume that his lawyer should be present for such a meeting, though, especially one who thinks of herself more as a career professional then a WAG-type in a Minnie Mouse dress on the red carpet in Hollywood? Not really as she is “still doing the same job that I used to do before”. By the way, Scarlett Johannsen is the female lead in this movie, not Amal. But Amal is George’s globalist leading lady, and they are the 1% calling the shots for everyone now.



The Clooneys and the globalists they represent, most notably George Soros and Vartan Gregorian, are both driven by an insatiable lust for power and money and, in order to keep feeding their beast, capitalism , the Constitution, and U. S. sovereignty must fall and fallen they have. In the past fifteen years, George Clooney has been one of the globalists’ most prominent Hollywood political propagandist. This is not a coincidence as they in some capacity finance almost every Clooney endeavor. Through the gay agenda, “climate change” and Islamophobia, they have secured the means by which the global elites will rule the world with the majority of its wealth as they lord over the rest of us while claiming to be supporters of “democracy”. As 2016 starts and the UN “power” couple press their “humanitarianism” hard as they flaunt their wealth while their politics destroy nations that result in the financial ruin, displacement, and death of thousands, remember it was “right wing extremists” who tried to warn everyone about the globalists and the Clooneys. No one wanted to listen.
https://rednationrising.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/3782/